Best Of

let’s hopefully not base our opinion about the entire grid on one person’s reported voltage measured one day

how much gas is lost between the well and the burner on your furnace/boiler?

I agree! City agencies are also blindly pursuing 100% electrified heating in some buildings to meet LL97 goals, sometimes simply because (of politics) there is funding for new split systems and no funding for maintenance of existing steam systems. I think there is a lot of improvement to be made to building envelopes first, and maybe eventually our goal can be 90-10 or 80-20 gas-electric, which would be a massive improvement already, but 100% with no backup seems like a recipe for a couple months every year of low efficiency, high bills, and burst pipes…

» drop from 117 in the morning to 108 without a load.

Gah! That's third-world level.

As my old boss was fond of saying, "The laws of physics are strictly enforced."

Politics is not a good way to make energy policy. One day, electricity is the answer to everything, and fossil fuel = bad, then it's good again, same with wind and solar, just 180 degrees out of phase.

It's a complex game. Electricity is great, but it has to come from somewhere. Renewables are fantastic, but they require a stable infrastructure that can smooth out the dips and valleys.

Gas is a great way to heat, because it's highly efficient and works down to arbitrarily cold temperatures. Heat pumps are good but at 5 F you'd be more efficient with gas. And when it's 5 F outside, most of your electricity will come from burning gas, but half the input energy is lost between the gas turbine and the wall outlet.

What we need is an intelligent mix, not rigid rules based on the doctrine du jour.

I'm not a fan of the present administration but I agree with energy secretary Chris Wright, who basically says, We Need It All.