Groundwater (possibly high) and adding thin radiant slab over existing uninsulated slab, below grade

I'm planning to add insulation, radiant loops, thin concrete layer over 1960s slab, 4' below grade in an area that heats Mid-Oct to mid-May.
Then it happened Friday. I read a comment on this forum about ground water within 6'. I spent the weekend shooting elevations and reviewing neighbor soil tests. There is also a good sized farm irrigation ditch that crosses the property, running mid-May to July. My conclusion is #1) likely high groundwater while the ditch runs and a little after and… #2) possibly within the 6' zone at other times, but hard to know for sure. Could be a foot or two above or below.
Local average groundwater temps are 51F. Slab relative humidity (when it's been checked) ranges from 70%-99% RH.
I don't mind the situation #1. It seems #2 could be an issue.
a) how bad is this, practically?
b) are there any 'not quite full' soil tests that allow you to gauge water table level without spending big bucks?
c) open to any other information. Also have a diagram summarizing what is known that I can share… but it's complex.
Thanks, guys.
Comments
-
-
@hot_rod - there's no bulk water issue whatsoever. Years ago we excavated around the home, installed a perimeter drain near and slightly below the footer, etc and dimple mat on the stem walls. That was a BIG project… the crew hand digging it was here probably 6-8 weeks. It drains to a perforated sump inside the home which I installed, 3' deep, maybe perforated down 24"-28". That pump has run only a couple times that I can remember or have seen in the last 7 years - so the groundwater doesn't get within 2' of the slab. Is the water 4' or 12' when the ditch isn't running? I'm not sure.
Of course, the perimeter drain was only slightly below the footer, and 5' more is a long ways down. When I dug the sump, which I am guessing was 2' after the ditch stopped running, the sandy soil I excavated down to 3' was 100% damp, but not to the point you could squeeze any moisture out of it.
0 -
Im part of an irrigation system dating back to the 1920s As homes and subdivisions replace the farms we have been installing culverts to replace open ditches
This solves a few issues like you mentioned as well as mosquitoes and liability. We use mainly 15” corrugated plastic pipe, concrete diversion boxes at property corners
It seems a bore hole in a few places would shed some light on the water table level
Maybe rent a powered post hole digger
Bob "hot rod" Rohr
trainer for Caleffi NA
Living the hydronic dream1 -
In my county there are many of these ditches. Hand dug for 10's of miles in the 1800's. They fill some of the local reservoirs. You would need more like a 5' culvert, or two 4' :) It's probably 4' across at the bottom, 15' across at the top, and the bridge is about 5-1/2' above the bottom of the ditch.
I would go for a post hole digger if they make one that would go that deep…. but we're talking 10' just to hit 6' below the basement. Or 6-1/2' if cutting the slab, which is a bit of a chore.. I'm not sure they will do those depths?
Now, I do have a well near the house I've never opened in 9 years - has been inoperable. I started digging out the cover today to see if I can open the head and see if the top liner is perforated. Original hand written permit mentions 5-60' tan white limestone, which wasn't mentioned in soil studies 200' to the east and 160' to the S. The house is long and narrow… the ends may have entirely different soils… so I agree with your comment on multiple holes.
0 -
The problem with high water table, but below your slab (which it sounds like it is) is that saturated soil is a wonderful conductor of heat — and it's even worse if the water is moving (it may not be in your case).
However — it's easy enough to avoid the problem: insulation. You mention insulation in your original post — and that's your answer. As much of it — at least two inches, maybe four to six if you can lose the headroom.
Br. Jamie, osb
Building superintendent/caretaker, 7200 sq. ft. historic house museum with dependencies in New England0 -
If the ditch is causing the high water table, and only runs May- July it should not effect your radiant slab so much? Only one way to know for sure.
Can you check the level in the well, that may tell you something. Although the well water should not be run-off water necessarily.
The farms stop irrigating in July? We run May- September here.
Bob "hot rod" Rohr
trainer for Caleffi NA
Living the hydronic dream0 -
This is the answer. You're focusing on the wrong thing by looking at the groundwater. Without insulation, most of the heat you send into the slab is going into the ground and not the living space, regardless of the soil type below.
0 -
I came to the conclusion over night that I likely won't know if I have groundwater here, without some tests, which can be expensive. On Jamie and DCContrarian's point, I don't know how significantly ground water or moist soil affects the overall heat loss, other than it's notable. My calcs, which are old and in Uponor's old ADS program jump up about 25% when I check the 'groundwater within 6' checkbox. I also saw postings here about natural gas consumption doubling or tripling. Is one of these closer to the truth than the other? I will ask my radiant guy to also re-run his numbers with groundwater considered.
I spent an hour on the phone with my architect friend today. Since the company doing the soil studies for septic and construction near by is no longer in business, he gave me the name of the guy who had worked for them and took over. I will check with him.
@Jamie Hall and @DCContrarian - The original plan I had built the stairs to was for a slim assembly. 1" EPS or XPS insulation, 1/2" loops, and 1-1/4" concrete over the insulation - so 2-1/4" assembly. My radiant guy said more insulation was better, but that I could get by with an inch. He mentioned 1-1/4 to 1-1/2" on the pour, with the right mixture. In my case, I am basing the 1-1/4" at the high point of the slab, as it has settled 1/4 to 3/4" lower across much of it, and of course we'd pour level. Note: no major cracking of the slab.
Headroom is tight. With the planned 2-1/4" makeup, I will have finished ceiling height AFF of 7' 8-3/4" for most of the basement, and 7' 7" in one bedroom, with one bathroom at 7' 6-1/2". Equally notable is that several of the door headers are structural beams. So, with any increase in height, I'm cutting down 80" doors. Not the end of the world, but would like to minimize.
After talking with my architect friend, we decide it should be OK to go up to 1-1/2" and possibly 2" thick insulation, with some sacrifices.
I know Jaime mentioned 2-4" insulation. Do you all think that getting to 2" insulation beneath the pour, such that regardless of any ground water, my losses should be reasonable?
@hot_rod - It would be great if the water was only present when the ditch runs. The neighbors soil tests 30' from the ditch (I'm 75' away) showed water at -7' in mid-july (2 weeks after the ditch stopped) and at -9' when tested in early october. So the water went down, but not away. They also mention a gravel/sand layer around -9', which is about 3' below the ditch. In their other test, about 100-120' from the ditch, and within 1' of grade of my house. They found no water in the 12' pit, and mineralization from prior water at about -9'. My slab is about 4' below grade.
So, there seems to be some permanent/longer-term water there, just a bit lower. While I feel reasonably confident there's water within 6' when the ditch runs, I would guess 50/50 chance there's water within 6' in October. I'm considering boring a sample hole through the slab just to see if I can see if the soil is damp in October, but first I'll run some relative humidity tests on the slab today/tomorrow.
These ditches were originally dug for farms. In fact, my country neighborhood (built in the 60's) used to be farm land. Some farms still use the water, but many of the shares have been sold to municipalities at this point, and they store it in a reservoir. Water rights are a massive deal here in Colorado, and certain ditches have different priorities than others, ours I think ranked like #23 or so. So regardless of if farmers still want the water, it gets shut off due to agreements.
Other ideas by anyone, I'm all ears.
0 -
yeah, without testing we are all guessing.
A bore in the slab is not a bad idea Home Depot rents up to 5” or so core drills
Have you done any Radon testing? High levels are fairly common in basements in my SLC Utah area
That would involve some core in the slab to mitigate, it would be a good time to check that
If the unknowns are too great, panel radiators get you about the same comfort and you don’t deal with all the slab and elevation change issues
Bob "hot rod" Rohr
trainer for Caleffi NA
Living the hydronic dream0 -
@hot_rod - yeah, I have an sds and core bit up to 2-1/2" bit but going deeper might be an issue that small. Like you suggest, I might have to rent the bigger max tool and bit. I was looking last night at some hand well drilling equipment. I even saw an auger at harbor freight that is 2" x 36", but I haven't seen yet if I could adapt that funky attachment to something I own and if I could successfully extend. I do have a camera I could send down if I can get a somewhat clean cut.
Yes, radon galore here. I specifically tied in the new foundation drain system to a radon fan, which works great for that, but sucks some air near the sump and may cool the stem wall behind the dimple mat. I wasn't thinking about that at the time.
I've been kicking this part of the project down the road for years now, somewhat because I could not determine how to deal with the moisture issues and not knowing what sealing the rest of the slab will lead to under my existing structural framing. Now it's time to get my house back together :)
As to panel radiators, it is a good thought. I installed a few of the Myson decor rads upstairs in the MBR, along with some fintube under the bath.
Last week I ran the numbers on radiant over slab vs radiators, and radiant won financially - even with the grind and epoxy of the slab and the concrete pour and having a contractor install the tubing/manifolds.
I can still remember when we just had some baseboard and the nylon carpet + pad over the slab, and my feet literally freezing at my desk. I'm not sure radiators will address that, and based on the information coming together, think I may still need to insulate the slab with radiators. And I'd still need to level the old garage area with the floor drain slope.
One of the killers with the radiators is I would have to rebuild the stairs, which was a long, slow process for me, though very much crafted, true, and robust to last a lifetime. I think just the framing materials to rebuild those is probably over $1000 today. I'd rather invest that in making the place comfortable.
0 -
Well… more details would be needed.
But.
First, it is not so much where water stands in a borehole, although that is important — it is how saturated is the soil at the bottom of the slab. And that depends on the soil type as much as where the water stands. In very close soils, saturation doesn't get much more than a few inches above where the water stands. In loamy soils, it can easily reach six feet above the level of standing water.
Second, if the soil is saturated at or near the slab bottom, you simply are not going to warm it up. Saturated soil is an excellent conductor of heat. Concrete (your existing slab) isn't quite as good — but a safe assumption will be that the top of the existing slab will be at — and stay at — average ground temperature pretty much regardless of what you do above it.
Therefore, it becomes a rather simple matter to calculate how many BTUh you need to put into your radiant system to keep the floor temperature at, say 75 — and the biggest single factor in that calculation (other than the delta T) is how much insulation you have between your tubing and the top of the existing slab. Most foams have an R value of around 3.5 to 4.0 per inch. Heat loss in this application is inversely, linearly proportional to thickness and directly to delta T. The heat loss to the ground needs to be added to the heat delivered to the room.
Br. Jamie, osb
Building superintendent/caretaker, 7200 sq. ft. historic house museum with dependencies in New England0
Categories
- All Categories
- 87.1K THE MAIN WALL
- 3.2K A-C, Heat Pumps & Refrigeration
- 58 Biomass
- 427 Carbon Monoxide Awareness
- 115 Chimneys & Flues
- 2.1K Domestic Hot Water
- 5.7K Gas Heating
- 111 Geothermal
- 163 Indoor-Air Quality
- 3.7K Oil Heating
- 72 Pipe Deterioration
- 1K Plumbing
- 6.4K Radiant Heating
- 393 Solar
- 15.5K Strictly Steam
- 3.4K Thermostats and Controls
- 55 Water Quality
- 49 Industry Classes
- 49 Job Opportunities
- 18 Recall Announcements