Click here to Find a Contractor in your area.
Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.

If you've found help here, check back in to let us know how everything worked out.
It's a great way to thank those who helped you.
Need to contact us? Visit https://heatinghelp.com/contact-us/.

Life expediency for a Burnham residential boiler?

JakekJakek Posts: 18Member
Here's a mid-summer question: I have a 1989 mid-size Burnham gas boiler (Independence?) for a single family house I recently bought. The two previous owners have been religious about yearly servicing and biweekly LWCO blow-downs plus occasionally draining a few pints until it runs clean. People look at the boiler and are surprised it's 30. When I got the house the pressure was on the high side (~4psi) but it's since been replaced by vaporstat which is set for as low as it will go -- about 10oz. The heating system seems to run fairly well although I feel like the risers (which I assume are original) seem a bit undersized for some radiators.

I had a plumber in for a estimate for another project who noticed the boiler and gave a bit of a hard sell to replace it now, claiming there's a $2k incentive available if replaced when functional. Given the fact the system runs OK I'm disinclined to spend the $$$$ to replace a functional boiler.

So my question to the experts: Is there any reason to think the boiler is at or nearing the end of it's life? And/or, should I replace the MM float type LWCO now (it's well beyond 10 years old) even if it tests fine?

I suspect it should be skimmed which is on my project list.

Comments

  • FredFred Posts: 7,978Member
    My Burnham is 36 years old and still running fine. The newer Burnhams have a life expectancy of 10 to 15 years but the older ones seem to run well past that. Clearly something changed in the 90's. In any case, I have no intentions of replacing mine until it leaks. Heck, it may still have more life in it than the new ones. As for the MM#67 LWCO, if you take it apart and scrape it out and check the float to make sure it isn't water logged and the switch works fine, it probably is good to go. I replaced mine at about 25 years, just because.
  • ethicalpaulethicalpaul Posts: 799Member
    Did you replace the float type with a probe type, @Fred ? Is that something that would be recommended generally?
    1 pipe Utica 112 in Cedar Grove, NJ, 1913 coal > oil > NG
  • FredFred Posts: 7,978Member

    Did you replace the float type with a probe type, @Fred ? Is that something that would be recommended generally?

    No, I replaced my float type with another MM67. My boiler doesn't have a spare tapping, in the right location for the probe. The MM67 is tapped into a Tee off of the sight glass.
  • EBEBRATT-EdEBEBRATT-Ed Posts: 5,951Member
    @Jakek

    What @Fred said. If it's working good keep running it
  • KoanKoan Posts: 430Member
    I have the original MM67 on my 50 year old American Standard gas boiler. the float failed about 3 years ago, so I overhauled it with a new float and quarter turn blow down valve. It took a few hours to clean it all out but it still works fine.
  • Tim McElwainTim McElwain Posts: 4,256Member
    Does this boiler have a Powerpile gas valve system? If so do not get rid of it until you have to. The powerpile systems gives you heat when there is a power failure.
  • ZmanZman Posts: 5,051Member
    You might consider having a true steam pro look at it. If it has signs of combustion side condensation or deterioration or if there is excess sludge buildup internally, it might be worth being proactive and replacing it on "your terms". If you end up replacing in an emergency, you wont get the rebate and will likely pay top dollar for the replacement.
    "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough"
    Albert Einstein
  • Intplm.Intplm. Posts: 837Member
    The old adage; "If it ain't broke, dont fix it."
  • PMJPMJ Posts: 839Member
    There are risks either way. I'm sticking with mine and it is now at 63 years. It very well might have more years left in it than a brand new one...might not. A good friend in the commercial boiler supply business tells me he'd take the bet that it will outlast a new one. The boiler is obviously very happy. I accept the risk that I may have a failure at exactly the wrong time.
  • JakekJakek Posts: 18Member
    @Zman How would one determine if there is excess sludge build up internally? What would be an indication of combustion side condensation?

    FWIW, I only need to drain a pint or two before it runs clear. There's no wet return in this system. The Honeywell gas regulator/ignitor was replaced recently.

    Thanks everyone for the comments. I'm sticking with my gut feeling that there's no need to consider replacement now. Unlike the boiler, there's no question the house's roof is going to need to be replaced soon. :neutral:
  • EBEBRATT-EdEBEBRATT-Ed Posts: 5,951Member
    When I started in 73' the only boilers we replaced were 40 years or older. It was common to see boilers 50 years old and older still running.

    Now, were replacing boiler that are 10 years old. True some of this is due to installation errors and yes the old boilers were more forgiving.
  • mikeg2015mikeg2015 Posts: 899Member
    I’ve inspected a few hot water boilers from the early 60’s or late 50’s with the big heavy cast iron burners. Can’t remember the model name, but there were chugging along, not a leak in sight, Flames looked nice and even.
  • ZmanZman Posts: 5,051Member
    One of the steam guys could tell you the best way to inspect the steam chamber
    On the combustion side, look for dandruff around the burners, any corrosion, or signs of leak.
    "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough"
    Albert Einstein
Sign In or Register to comment.

Welcome

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!