Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.
Need to contact us? Visit https://heatinghelp.com/contact-us/.
Click here to Find a Contractor in your area.
If our community has helped you, please consider making a contribution to support this website. Thanks!

3,500 PPM CO

Options

I was doing a Triangle Tube recall on a PA250 today. Everything went well until the combustion analysis. The high CO count destroyed the CO sensor in my Testo 300. Colleagues have said replace the burner. Others have said to check the orifice size, if any, but I don't see one shown anywhere. Anyone with experience with this here?

8.33 lbs./gal. x 60 min./hr. x 20°ΔT = 10,000 BTU's/hour

Two btu per sq ft for degree difference for a slab

Comments

  • mattmia2
    mattmia2 Member Posts: 16,820

    was here like a log of carbon extruding out the vent?

    ethicalpaul
  • Steamhead
    Steamhead Member Posts: 18,502

    Sounds like not enough air.

    All Steamed Up, Inc.
    Towson, MD, USA
    Steam, Vapor & Hot-Water Heating Specialists
    Oil & Gas Burner Service
    Consulting
    bjohnhy
  • ChrisJ
    ChrisJ Member Posts: 17,390

    Are you sure the analyzer didn't just fail on it's own causing an abnormally high reading? Perhaps it was already acting flakey at the start?

    Single pipe 392sqft system with an EG-40 rated for 325sqft and it's silent and balanced at all times.

  • GGross
    GGross Member Posts: 1,903
    edited March 20

    I had this happen one time and someone (me) sent me the wrong venturi. I hit 9k and shut it down, my analyzer took about 3 days to clear I thought the sensor was toast but it was not! This was on an original series PS solo boiler

  • HydronicMike
    HydronicMike Member Posts: 347

    Unless burners are misaligned, I'd double check input. Underfired is a usual cause for high CO, as is impingement. On furnaces, cracked heat exchanger is another culprit.

  • Alan (California Radiant) Forbes
    Alan (California Radiant) Forbes Member Posts: 4,727
    edited March 20

    @mattmia2 No, but the exhaust run is about 80' long.

    @Steamhead We had the cover off and all the doors open to the outside, so there was plenty of air. We tried to find where the fresh air pipe termination was, but couldn't.

    @ChrisJ I thought the same thing, but there was a previous technician who got the same results.

    @GGross I'll check the venturi.

    @HydronicMike That's novel. I'll clock the meter.

    Gene: Looking at parts diagrams, it was interesting that the same burner and gas valve fit 3 different size boilers. Only the venturi changes.

    0-11.jpg

    0-10.jpg
    8.33 lbs./gal. x 60 min./hr. x 20°ΔT = 10,000 BTU's/hour

    Two btu per sq ft for degree difference for a slab
    ChrisJ
  • GGross
    GGross Member Posts: 1,903

    That looks like the correct venturi number, 051 at the end

    I think that model added an orifice for propane conversion, I do not think there was one installed for natural gas but i had a lot less hands on time with that exact model

    the propane conversion kit instructions for that one don't mention removing a natural gas orifice, just adding the propane one

    orifice.JPG
  • Thanks, Gene.

    The PA 155, 175 and 250 all use the same burner and gas valve. Just curious, If the wrong venturi was installed on this PA 250 boiler, wouldn't it just fire at a lower rate? It shouldn't have this high CO aberration.

    8.33 lbs./gal. x 60 min./hr. x 20°ΔT = 10,000 BTU's/hour

    Two btu per sq ft for degree difference for a slab
  • GGross
    GGross Member Posts: 1,903

    i still have the old failed venturi and the incorrect replacement . I use them as visual aids when needed, or to remind me of one of my biggest blunders lol

    The little pathway the fuel takes is also different for each model, so in my case I had one that the venturi opening was about 2x what it should be on the air side, and take a look at how much more fuel could probably get through the fuel side (opened these up quite a bit so you can see the opening better) So what I think was happening is that way too much fuel was getting in my burner resulting in very incomplete combustion. Not sure how thats happening with yours though assuming that venturi is correct, and you didn't remove any orifice or orifice gaskets.

    IMG_4730.jpeg IMG_4731.jpeg
  • Alan (California Radiant) Forbes
    Alan (California Radiant) Forbes Member Posts: 4,727
    edited March 20

    Yes, I see that the gate is much larger in the first photo. What a difference! I'll check on mine when I go back in April as the owners are away on vacation.

    I see in the second photo that the plastic in the venturi was destroyed.

    8.33 lbs./gal. x 60 min./hr. x 20°ΔT = 10,000 BTU's/hour

    Two btu per sq ft for degree difference for a slab
  • mattmia2
    mattmia2 Member Posts: 16,820

    maybe finding the intake and making sure it is ok is important or checking that the equivalent length of both is in spec. is there something that failed in the recalled parts that made it soot up and it is now burning off that soot?

  • EBEBRATT-Ed
    EBEBRATT-Ed Member Posts: 20,190

    Not likely the intake as he had the doors open and the intake would be pulling room air. I messed up my analyzer more than once and taught myself to pull it if the CO shoots up otherwise your standing there and can't do anything.

  • mattmia2
    mattmia2 Member Posts: 16,820

    oh, it is one of the ones that uses the cabinet as the intake connector?

  • tim smith
    tim smith Member Posts: 2,935

    Alan, was the burner replaced or at least cleaned. Also the heat x tubes may be clogged and obstructing flow of gas/air through heat x creating dirty burn.

  • Just cleaned. I'll be replacing the burner when I go back.

    Thanks for suggesting to clean the HX tubes. I'll do that with your silfos trick.

    8.33 lbs./gal. x 60 min./hr. x 20°ΔT = 10,000 BTU's/hour

    Two btu per sq ft for degree difference for a slab
    GGross
  • Alan (California Radiant) Forbes
    Alan (California Radiant) Forbes Member Posts: 4,727
    edited April 3

    I'll be returning to the job later this morning to check and replace the burner and venturi as necessary. I will also clock the boiler on high fire and clean the HX. After looking up the installation guidelines for the exhaust/fresh air piping, it's obvious that the actual length exceeds what is permitted for this Solo 250. The combined length is probably 80 feet, not counting any fittings. Three inch pipe.

    Screenshot 2026-04-03 at 6.29.31 AM.png
    8.33 lbs./gal. x 60 min./hr. x 20°ΔT = 10,000 BTU's/hour

    Two btu per sq ft for degree difference for a slab
  • We just finished the service. We clocked the boiler at 250K, so no problem there. The burner and HX were pristine and on first glance, the venturi was in good shape. But then I noticed that the adjustment screw was retracted all the way, so the problem seems that the burner was getting too much gas.

    I could have tried dialing down the venturi, but I had a new one and I didn't want to di*k around with a device that may have something else wrong with it.

    The boiler is working fine now. CO numbers come in at 60-70 ppm on high fire.

    0-10.jpg 0-12.jpg

    0-11.jpg
    8.33 lbs./gal. x 60 min./hr. x 20°ΔT = 10,000 BTU's/hour

    Two btu per sq ft for degree difference for a slab
    mattmia2Larry WeingartenPC7060