Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.
Need to contact us? Visit https://heatinghelp.com/contact-us/.
Click here to Find a Contractor in your area.

Stealing Steam Boiler Water for Hydronic Baseboard?

Options
Harry_6
Harry_6 Member Posts: 147

Greetings. Recently I saw a video in which a steam boiler had a pump attached below the waterline which was apparently taking boiler water and running it through a nearby basement hydronic baseboard. There was no Hartford loop on the boiler, either. It wasn't the subject of the video and it was never mentioned, but is this kosher? I can think of several reasons it seems really problematic, but I'd never seen this before. The boiler had a wet return running at about the same elevation as the baseboard, but not connected to it. I couldn't tell, but I suspect the pump was both taking water and returning it below the boiler waterline at or near the main condensate return connection. Thoughts?

Comments

  • delcrossv
    delcrossv Member Posts: 2,187

    Probably not picking up much heat if the baseboard supply and return are near each other, but they do need to be below the waterline.

    Trying to squeeze the best out of a Weil-McLain JB-5 running a 1912 1 pipe system.
    Grallert
  • Jamie Hall
    Jamie Hall Member Posts: 26,299

    Depends a lot on whether the system was pulling from the boiler or the wet return. If it's pulling from the boiler such a system can work very well, although ideally the return will be to a tapping some distance from the supply.

    Br. Jamie, osb
    Building superintendent/caretaker, 7200 sq. ft. historic house museum with dependencies in New England
    Grallert
  • EBEBRATT-Ed
    EBEBRATT-Ed Member Posts: 18,426

    Yes it can work. If all the piping is below the boiler water line and never rises above it that is best although it can be done if the piping does rise up. Best to use a bronze circulator. @DanHolohan tells how to install this in his books available on this site. They call it condenste hot water heating.

  • Long Beach Ed
    Long Beach Ed Member Posts: 1,798
    edited April 17

    We specify these all the time with small residential systems needing a baseboard loop to heat a finished basement below the boiler's waterline. Sometimes the loop is overhead, as in an attic.

    There are several ways to make this work, and there are some limitations and control considerations.

    A Hartford loop should still be present, and all the steam trim and piping is unchanged.

    The baseboard loop is best piped through the boiler, entering and leaving from different sections at different levels to insure mixing. A bypass should be made on the loop to temper the baseboard water eliminating the chance for cavitation of the pump due to high temperatures when steam is produced.

    An improved way of adding baseboard would use an internal hot water coil in the steam boiler with the subsequent hot water heating trim.

    delcrossvMad Dog_2Jackmartin
  • Harry_6
    Harry_6 Member Posts: 147

    Fascinating. Doesn't having the pump suction directly from the boiler kinda defeat the purpose of the Hartford loop? A leaking pump seal could theoretically empty the boiler. Of course the Hartford loop, itself, is kinda pointless, since we don't burn coal and have LWCo's. And certainly it's silly to have one on a system with a dry return. But I've seen it. What about feeding a first floor hot water radiator/baseboard from the pump discharge?

    Big Ed_4
  • Jamie Hall
    Jamie Hall Member Posts: 26,299

    Well, technically you are correct on a leaking pump seal — or for that matter any leak on the pumped loop — emptying the boiler. That's one of the reasons, among many, for having a LWCO. The Hartford Loop, however, still protects the boiler against a leaking wet return, and since that is by far the most common sources of leaks in a steam system, why not have it?

    You could, in principle, have a hot water radiator fed that way on the first floor. There are several ways to do it — the simplest being to have it up there and make sure it has no leaks, so that once it is purged a standard circulator can circulate it. However, a standard circulator likely will not be able to fill it if is allowed to empty for any reason. A higher head pump would work — provided there is enough head to avoid cavitation at the inlet. Another approach would be to use a heat exchanger and run a normal closed hydronic loop… more complicated.

    Br. Jamie, osb
    Building superintendent/caretaker, 7200 sq. ft. historic house museum with dependencies in New England
    PC7060
  • ethicalpaul
    ethicalpaul Member Posts: 7,798

    The Hartford Loop, however, still protects the boiler against a leaking wet return

    For a few minutes anyway. Don't worry about the hartford loop, it's orthogonal to this issue.

    Here's the article: https://heatinghelp.com/systems-help-center/how-to-run-a-hot-water-zone-off-a-steam-boiler/

    And here's my video of the one I made

    NJ Steam Homeowner.
    Free NJ and remote steam advice: https://heatinghelp.com/find-a-contractor/detail/new-jersey-steam-help/
    See my sight glass boiler videos: https://bit.ly/3sZW1el

    delcrossv
  • Harry_6
    Harry_6 Member Posts: 147

    Well, that's fascinating. In the couple hundred boiler installations I've seen in my area I have never seen it done this way. I have seen a domestic hot water heater used to power a baseboard loop, but that's it. Good to know there are other options available.

    PC7060
  • EBEBRATT-Ed
    EBEBRATT-Ed Member Posts: 18,426

    @Harry_6

    Its not that common but commonly done.😊

    ethicalpaul
  • Mad Dog_2
    Mad Dog_2 Member Posts: 8,311

    On Long Island, we have many old Villages (95% Steam heated) with a Zone of Baseboard for the finished basement or even a 1st floor den. This is super common here. Mad Dog

    Long Beach Edethicalpaul
  • Big Ed_4
    Big Ed_4 Member Posts: 3,246
    edited April 18

    If you pick up the suction from the wet return , and return it carefully back to the boiler , it will not delete the safety of the Hartford loop ?

    There was an error rendering this rich post.

  • Jamie Hall
    Jamie Hall Member Posts: 26,299

    If you want any useful heat, you have to pick up your suction from the boiler — and then the best place to return it is the wet return. @Big Ed_4 's suggestion would reduce the possibility of the circulating pump on the hot water loop pumping the system dry, true — but the wet return water is likely to be much cooler than the boiler water, unless the circulating loop flow is a large fraction of the boiler output.

    Br. Jamie, osb
    Building superintendent/caretaker, 7200 sq. ft. historic house museum with dependencies in New England
    delcrossv
  • ethicalpaul
    ethicalpaul Member Posts: 7,798
    edited April 20

    This is not a concern for 2 reasons.

    1. At least in my Peerless, the output port from the boiler (for indirects and for this) is not at the bottom, it's higher up, so it's impossible for the pump to empty the boiler regardless.
    2. The Hartford loop doesn't protect the boiler from dry firing, it only delays it for a short time, like an hour or so. The LWCO protects the boiler from dry firing.

    NJ Steam Homeowner.
    Free NJ and remote steam advice: https://heatinghelp.com/find-a-contractor/detail/new-jersey-steam-help/
    See my sight glass boiler videos: https://bit.ly/3sZW1el

  • 4Johnpipe
    4Johnpipe Member Posts: 487

    We've done this with a shell and tube heat exchanger creating a boiler and system loop. All below the Hartford water line.

    LANGAN'S PLUMBING & HEATING LLC
    Considerate People, Considerate Service, Consider It Done!
    732-751-1560
    email: langansph@yahoo.com
    www.langansplumbing.com
  • Jackmartin
    Jackmartin Member Posts: 200

    All excellent ideas. I would not do this because I have had jobs where the boiler dry fired and opps, the condensate pumped. The last one blew a 20 inch chimney liner and the cap 300 feet( the cap). Theoretically a wet return cannot do this, I am too old to believe in theoretically. The chap that said set up an heat exchanger that is part of the steam system and supplying hot water as the emitters heat source seems to an old guy like me much safer. I know this works and if Dan says it works it works, but I am still very hesitant to introduce variables in a steam system. Which brings me to my next comment, I am getting very fed up with older guys who should know better employing ," magical thinking ". The term means I don't know how this works so I will just make it into something I do understand. These aren't apprentices they have been around much longer. We have some truly excellent people here but they seem to be outnumbered. My question is have you had the same experience? I would like to know what book tells you to put a pumped return on a single pipe system or the boiler control is 1/2 on 2 psi off, you at the pressuretrol the idiot has the vutin and cutout mashed together magical thinking. Cheers Jack

  • Jamie Hall
    Jamie Hall Member Posts: 26,299

    I rather agree with you, @Jackmartin — though I might refer to it as incomplete thinking.

    Of which that one job you mentioned at the beginning there may have been an example. There is a risk of running the boiler dry, OK… but if you are going to install such a system, shouldn't you have two LWCO devices, one manual, and either of which shut off power to the entire operation? Or at least the manual one would? Perhaps it is due to some early and rather unpleasant experiences involving jungles, but I've always had a tendency to think to myself "what could go wrong here?" … and plan accordingly…

    Br. Jamie, osb
    Building superintendent/caretaker, 7200 sq. ft. historic house museum with dependencies in New England
  • jumper
    jumper Member Posts: 2,471

    How about using return hot water to inject condensate in case Dimension is insufficient? How about filtering or straining hot water to help keep boiler clean?