Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.
Need to contact us? Visit https://heatinghelp.com/contact-us/.
Click here to Find a Contractor in your area.

I need a new tank due to rot. Is Roth the way to go?

clydesdale
clydesdale Member Posts: 49

Hi. The tank will be outside. It will be replacing a leaking 275 that was in a garage. I can't put it back in the garage because code requires concrete posts and I will lose too much garage space. So, is the double walled Roth tank the way to go? Any other suggestions or things I should know about this?

Welcome

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.
«1

Comments

  • Miata
    Miata Member Posts: 37

    I had a 275 roth w hood installed outside a little over a year ago. Installed a concrete pad instead of lintels. To protect the oil line I installed it in liquid tite conduit from tank to just inside basement wall. The conduit also protects the line from rubbing as it passes through the block wall. No problems w the tank except every so often hand tighten large nuts that hold fill tube, vent tube, etc. I would add a bottle of Hot 4 in 1 before each fill if in a cold climate to prevent gelling and a tiger loop to help warm up incoming oil.

    Grallert
  • clydesdale
    clydesdale Member Posts: 49

    Thanks. Did you use "tiger loop"?

  • Miata
    Miata Member Posts: 37

    Yes, I live outside Philadelphia so it isn't super cold but has been down to 9 degrees this winter and the tiger loop w filter plus an extra line loop has warmed the incoming oil.

  • leonz
    leonz Member Posts: 1,441
    edited January 7

    For the money and work involved a Highland 275 or 550 gallon Petro-hopper would be a better option as it is designed as a steel tank within a tank with a top draw.

    HydronicMikeEdTheHeaterMan
  • yellowdog
    yellowdog Member Posts: 257

    I'll be the devils advocate here. I would pour a concrete pad and install a conventional 275 gallon steel tank with bottom draw. I am not a fan of top draw and especially when it is outside. The key is to paint the tank (they only come primed) and put a shed roof over it. It will last for years like this and you won't ever have an issue from the top draw. The tigerloop ultra with the filter should still get mounted at the burner.

  • Grallert
    Grallert Member Posts: 931

    Yes get a Roth with a lid or any of the HDPE tanks. Tigerloop and you're all set.

    Miss Hall's School service mechanic, greenhouse manager, teacher, dog walker and designated driver

  • Miata
    Miata Member Posts: 37

    Rereading the original post has me wondering if .... since the footprint of a Roth is much less than a conventional tank, would there be room in your garage for it w the necessary concrete posts?

  • yellowdog
    yellowdog Member Posts: 257

    @pecmsg To avoid having to use a top draw, I'm ok with the steel tank lasting for over 20 years. Having a poly tank does not outweigh the negatives of a top draw in my eyes.

  • pecmsg
    pecmsg Member Posts: 5,799
    edited January 7

    Nothing wrong with top draw (Like everything else WHEN done right.)

    LRCCBJHydronicMikeEdTheHeaterMan
  • HVACNUT
    HVACNUT Member Posts: 6,652

    I did the same as @Miata . Roth 1000L on a poured slab. Sleeved a 1/2" coated oil line though 3/4" flexible conduit (Sealtight) to a Tiger Loop Ultra. I add fuel treatment at every delivery. Never a problem except I had to replace the tank gauge last week.

  • mrcoder
    mrcoder Member Posts: 63

    Steel tanks will inevitably rot from the inside because of the unavoidable condensation. Over time biologicals ( bacteria, algae) will establish, and make the water at the bottom acidic. Typical steel tank life expectancy is ~20 years, and a tank leak is a pain to deal with. A leak is not a question of "if", but "when". True, I have seen steel tanks that lasted 50 years, perhaps the old ones were made from better steel (?) but I would not count on it.

    Roth tanks with their HDPE internal tank will not have this problem.
    They come with a 30 year, million $ warranty. Their only drawback is cost. The overhead feed needs a competent installation to avoid air leaks, a Tigerloop is highly recommended.

  • Jamie Hall
    Jamie Hall Member Posts: 25,756

    I'm with @yellowdog on this one. If the steel tank is in a location where you can see it, a leak will be noticed. 20 years? Cedric's is going on for 40. It's tested (ultrasound) yearly by my oil dealer, who is a bit of a stickler for that. It was, once upon a time, a top feed, but… for a variety of reasons that got changed.

    Br. Jamie, osb
    Building superintendent/caretaker, 7200 sq. ft. historic house museum with dependencies in New England
  • EBEBRATT-Ed
    EBEBRATT-Ed Member Posts: 17,415

    Top feed should be avoided.

  • Mad Dog_2
    Mad Dog_2 Member Posts: 7,838

    I really like Roth & Highland tanks...pick of the little. Mad Dog

  • leonz
    leonz Member Posts: 1,441

    The Highland petrohopper is a steel tank within a tank. The Petrometer is tank monitoring system that provides the user with actual tank level gallon readings to avoid guess work about how much oil there is in the tank.

    HydronicMike
  • mrcoder
    mrcoder Member Posts: 63

    AFAIK the standard warranty is only 10 years on the Highland tanks. They do offer 30 years for extra money.

    No idea how they compare price wise to the Roth. The Roth are popular, and they only do overhead lines for them. Make sure you are getting a Tigerloop with your install, most installers include that in the price here in Southern MA.

  • mrcoder
    mrcoder Member Posts: 63

    I am skeptical about "testing" an oil tank with ultrasound or whatever. My inlaws had a 50 year steel tank, it was allegedly tested yearly by the oil co, and they gave it a clean bill of health each year. All that testing did nothing to prevent it from starting to leak eventually. When tanks leak, the problems range from "stressful" to "cathastrophic". If you have an aging steel tank, you should keep on hand a few Rectorseal patches, I find these provide a reasonable temporary fix to pinhole leaks.

  • Jamie Hall
    Jamie Hall Member Posts: 25,756

    Testing will not prevent a leak from happening. That should be obvious. What it will do is give you some idea as to the wastage of the tank metal from corrosion; when several random test spots on the bottom get down to half the original thickness or so, it's time for a new tank.

    And it would be extremely rare for tank to fail catastrophically. Drip drip drip is more llike it. Which is not to say it can't happen — but it's usually the result of being filled much too rapidly, thus pressurizing it.

    Br. Jamie, osb
    Building superintendent/caretaker, 7200 sq. ft. historic house museum with dependencies in New England
    LRCCBJEdTheHeaterMan
  • RTW
    RTW Member Posts: 204

    "They do offer 30 years for extra money." in above post

    All this talk about the benefits of a "warranty on oil tanks " up to 30 years in posts begs the question: 1) Who has experienced a failure under warranty on an oil tank a decade or two later under warranty and how was it handled - was it honored? And, 2) did the same company that issued it - as well as the manufacturer - honor it? 3) Thirdly, was the warranty transferable to a new owner?

    Actual real world experience on topic welcomed

    Regards,

    RTW

  • RTW
    RTW Member Posts: 204

    P.S. Asphalt roof warranties reduce payment over time in contract for wear & tear , stated in warranty

    Just sayin, but its never mentioned kin posts about oil tanks on this site

  • RTW
    RTW Member Posts: 204

    P.P.S. some professionals on this site must have done warranty work on oil tanks - comments welcomed

  • LRCCBJ
    LRCCBJ Member Posts: 958

    @Jamie Hall

     but it's usually the result of being filled much too rapidly, thus pressurizing it.

    I have a profound interest in this statement. One house has two tanks………….2" fill to tank #1…………spill to tank #2………..1.5" vent from tank #2.

    All the calculations show that the 1.5" vent can easily pass 8 CFM with negligible pressure drop across 15 feet. This easily accommodates the fuel delivery at 60 GPM.

    That being said………….the 35 year old tank #1 failed last year…………so I am in a bit of a quandry whether the typical 275 Granby can handle a very minor pressure increase during a fill. I have instructed the company to slow fill above 200 gallons due to the quandry.

    The question is the resistance of the whistle. There I have a real concern. If you observe the whistle after fuel stops from the truck, it continues for at least 5 seconds.

    I'm tempted to put a gauge on tank #1 and see what occurs during a delivery unless I can get some data on the resistance of the whistle at 8 CFM.

  • Jamie Hall
    Jamie Hall Member Posts: 25,756

    35 is pushing it for a steel tank — sometimes. It depends a lot on how much fuel is used (how often the tank if filled) and the quality of the fuel. But it's pushing it.

    Did anyone check wall thickness before it failed? Ideally done yearly, and replace when wastage is over 50%.

    Br. Jamie, osb
    Building superintendent/caretaker, 7200 sq. ft. historic house museum with dependencies in New England
  • LRCCBJ
    LRCCBJ Member Posts: 958

    Not checked. But is is still sitting on the side of the house waiting for me.😁

    What's your thoughts on the pressure increase in the tanks due to the whistle?

  • EBEBRATT-Ed
    EBEBRATT-Ed Member Posts: 17,415

    Best way with multiple tanks is to forget the cross over piping it's just not the best way Put a separate fill on each tank and the 1 vent common to both tanks.

    Why risk pressurizing the first tank? You talking saving 6' of pipe a couple of elbows

    Vents are supposed to be the same size as the fills now. Another stupid rule. In the past a 2" fill and 1 1/4 ' vent was the rule and it was fine.

    Then they went for the cross over which is just a problem.

  • mrcoder
    mrcoder Member Posts: 63

    A tank warranty is not much help if there is an oil leak. It would cover the replacement cost of the tank, which is in all likelihood unpleasant, but survivable. What you really need is a cleanup insurance.
    Environmental cleanup can be extremely expensive. In addition to their tank warranty, Roth includes a 2 million $ policy, covering cleanup costs.

    Alternatively (at least in MA) you can get a rider to your homeowners policy for this. I have not come across
    anybody who has such a policy, and suffered and environmental cleanup, AFAIK most people dont have any coverage.

  • LRCCBJ
    LRCCBJ Member Posts: 958

    Why risk pressurizing the first tank? You talking saving 6' of pipe a couple of elbows

    I am confident that the tanks are not pressurized with a single fill and a single a 1.25" vent. It makes no sense to have separate fills to each tank to avoid "pressurizing the first tank". There is a 2" crossover that is only three feet in length…………shorter than the five foot fill pipe to the first tank so there is no resistance to cross to the second tank other than the two elbows.

    What I am questioning is the resistance of the vent. If sufficient, it will pressurize BOTH tanks.

  • HydronicMike
    HydronicMike Member Posts: 7

    This is a horrible and expensive idea for a home heating oil tank

  • HydronicMike
    HydronicMike Member Posts: 7

    I agree with almost all of this, but Roth tanks are a little cheaper than conventional steel tanks

  • Jamie Hall
    Jamie Hall Member Posts: 25,756

    On the insurance aspect. Yes indeed, a full scale oil spill cleanup is expensive. I know. I've done quite a number of them…

    Which is a major advantage to having a contractual relationship with a reliable oil supplier who checks tanks. And has spill or leak cleanup insurance. Any of the larger ones should. Now… they don't always, so it's worth noting about the company. I would point out that they aren't doing it so much as to cover you (although if they leak check the tank they will — if they don't, they won't) as to cover themselves. Or haven't you contemplated the consequences of a tank truck with. let's say 5,000 gallons of number 2 having an accident?… or one of their own main storage tanks leaking?

    Br. Jamie, osb
    Building superintendent/caretaker, 7200 sq. ft. historic house museum with dependencies in New England
  • leonz
    leonz Member Posts: 1,441
    edited March 16

    I guess the people that buy them for fuel storage use are wrong and all wet in thier thinking then.

    HydronicMike
  • EBEBRATT-Ed
    EBEBRATT-Ed Member Posts: 17,415

    @LRCCBJ

    Oil truck pumps generally have a gauge at the meter and they usually put out 80psi at the meter. I agree there is a large pressure drop through 100 feet of hose.

    If you have ever been in a basement when a 275 is being filled the is still a lot of pressure going into a sheet metal tank.

    MA required a 2" fill and an 1 1/4" vent for years and there were no issues. Crossovers can cause issues. MA required each tank to have there own fill and multiple tanks could be common vented to the 1 1/4 vent.

    Now they want the fill and the vent the same size which is stupid. Now you are legal with a 1 1/4 fill and vent. A smaller fill make the oil foam more with the higher velocity. As @Jamie Hall said and I know this from having delivered oil the whistle keeps going for a while after the fill is shut off. That in itself proves that some pressure even if minimal is still being vented from the tank.

    With a cross over the first tank is subjected to hydraulic pressure as oil (not air) is forced through the cross over. I think it is a poor idea.

  • LRCCBJ
    LRCCBJ Member Posts: 958

    @EBEBRATT-Ed

    With a cross over the first tank is subjected to hydraulic pressure as oil (not air) is forced through the cross over. I think it is a poor idea.


    Clearly, the oil is not going to flow to the second tank without some pressure in the first tank. However, taking a look at the capability of 2"……………it can flow 3600 GPH for an EL of 15 feet with less than .5 psi driving it. The 2" is huge.

    However, if the vent provides a restriction (and it clearly does), how much does this raise the pressure in BOTH tanks? I am going to attempt to find out.

  • mrcoder
    mrcoder Member Posts: 63

    Re: Oil vendors carrying liability insurance to cover cleanup cost. I think they carry this (if they do) to cover themselves when a spill is clearly their fault. For example, a tank filling inlet that is not hooked up to a tank.
    (in which case they would just dump oil into your basement).

    I find it hard to imagine they would carry an expensive policy to cover their customers. If you have a tank that leaks, they could argue that had nothing to do with them, so it is on you.

    If they inspect and certify your tank, then maybe. In such case I would carefully read the policy for exceptions and jump-outs. I would expect their insurance co. to vigorously try to get out of any such costly liability.

    In a state that mandates insurance companies to provide cleanup coverage (if you ask for it),
    I would use such inspection report or cert to get a cleanup rider from my own insurance company.

  • EBEBRATT-Ed
    EBEBRATT-Ed Member Posts: 17,415

    That's why I think separate fills are better, your not pressurizing the first tank.

  • LRCCBJ
    LRCCBJ Member Posts: 958

    Cannot disagree. The question that begs is how much is the first tank pressurized? I think I am going to cobble up a gauge to determine.

  • mrcoder
    mrcoder Member Posts: 63

    Is the thinking about avoiding over-pressurizing a tank about trying to avoid stressing any existing pinholes, or thin spots? Hoping you can get an extra few years out of an existing tank?
    IMO the simplest way to hook up 2 tanks is to each have its own fill and whistle. For 2 tanks, a simple Y connection for the 2 pickup lines to run into, and then a single line to the burner. That is how I hooked up my 2x400 Gallon Roth-s.


    I think worrying about pressure is perhaps focusing on the wrong thing. Instead, avoid being in a situation where you need to worry about this. If you have pinholes or a deteriorating older tank, at best you are delaying the inevitable. It is a question of when, not if such tank is going to leak, probably at an inconvenient time.

  • Jamie Hall
    Jamie Hall Member Posts: 25,756

    oh quite! Hence the comment about getting a new tank when you find 50% wastage on the old one!

    Br. Jamie, osb
    Building superintendent/caretaker, 7200 sq. ft. historic house museum with dependencies in New England
  • EBEBRATT-Ed
    EBEBRATT-Ed Member Posts: 17,415

    Oil tanks as far as I know were 12 gauge. That is not very thick. They make 10 gauge as well.

    A full 275 gallon tank the oil weighs over 2000# and that is just the oil. There is no internal bracing to hold the walls together.

    I saw a job once weher the oil company had overfilled the tank and the vent was plugged and it wasn't pretty. The tank bulged out all over the place and started leaking and dripping.

Welcome

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.