Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.
Need to contact us? Visit https://heatinghelp.com/contact-us/.
Click here to Find a Contractor in your area.

App for calculating correct existing steam radiator BTU?

Im going through my house and taking an inventory of all existing steam radiators. Charlie is coming tomorrow afternoon to look at my boiler situation, but I'm trying to get these numbers to save some time.

Looking at the Weil-McLain Boiler Replacement Guide, I was able to find the type of radiators I have (tube, I think), but their square feet of radiator per radiator section chart doesn't offer all the numbers I need to deteemine square footage so I can calculate BTU.

For example, most of the radiators have 4 tubes, with various sections. Some have 3, 5 and 6 tubes. So looking at the chart I'm not able to find my radiators. I'm hoping there's an app that will allow me to type in tubes, sections, height and width.

I wrote down every measurement in my house and am also posting a photo of one of the radiators. Thanks if you can point me in the right direction!

Comments

  • Jamie Hall
    Jamie Hall Member Posts: 24,842

    Perhaps the problem is in a confusion of tubes (per section) and sections? For instance, has 4 tubes per section and, I think (bit hard to count) 14 sections. The best match (doesn't have to be perfect) looks to be the lower table (tube type radiators about 2 feet high, so the table shows. 2 1/2 per section, so 14 sections would be an EDR of about 35 square feet for that radiator.

    Do that for each radiator.

    There's no need to calculate the BTU — use the EDR rating for the boiler. They've done all the math for you.

    Br. Jamie, osb
    Building superintendent/caretaker, 7200 sq. ft. historic house museum with dependencies in New England
    Grallertethicalpaul
  • Grallert
    Grallert Member Posts: 772

    Am I reading you right? Your photo example shows a four tube 16 section radiator. it's hard to see but say it's 26" tall, that's 2 1/4 sgft of steam per section. Think of the sections as slices of bread. And because you only have a limited selection of boiler sizes you really only need to get as close to one of those boiler sizes. Not too big and not too small but Charlie will have more in put. Just get as close as you can.

    Miss Hall's School service mechanic, greenhouse manager,teacher and dog walker
  • EdTheHeaterMan
    EdTheHeaterMan Member Posts: 9,378
    edited September 11

    Your list is labeled incorrectly. Where you have the word Tubes at the top, That should read Sections. For example the radiator in the picture is a 4 tube that should have a depth (width on the chart) of about 7" (you measured 6") which has about 16 to 18 sections (hard to count the sections farthest from the camera because they are out of focus). So that radiator might be the one you have listed as 18, 30, 6, 26. That is on the chart as having 2-3/4 Sq Ft EDR. So if it has 18 sections that has a total of 49.5 SqFt of radiation

    The one on the top of your list (10, 17, 5, 19) would be about 27.5 SqFt of radiation.

    Make a new list. Sections, Tubes, Width (what you are calling depth), and Hight where you count the sections. The Tubes, Width, and Hight where you find the closest match on the chart and place that info on the list.

    Where you show a 5, 14, 4, 26 on the bottom of your list, that may be a thin tube that has 1-2/3 Sq Ft radiation. Check to see if the tube diameters are smaller that the rest of the radiators.

    EDIT: After looking at your numbers, that top example in the photo I doctored up, may also may be a thin tube radiator. If that is the case then your EDR would be only 2-1/3 SqFt of radiation which would make the total 23.3 SqFt EDR

    Edward Young Retired

    After you make that expensive repair and you still have the same problem, What will you check next?

    GrallertLegendsCreek
  • LegendsCreek
    LegendsCreek Member Posts: 79

    @EdTheHeaterMan and everyone else, thanks for the info. I had all the terms correct in my head but didn't write them down correctly. I've rewritten my list, and am attaching it below.

    There a few problems.. 95% of my radiators are 6 1/4 width, and 4 tube. The manual I'm looking doesn't list this as an option with column, tube or this tube radiators, so I went with standard tube 7". There were 4 radiators that were a perfect fit for the thin tube, so I calculated them using that chart. (They look identical to all the other radiators, so it's possible the rest of my radiators are also thin tube, but I had to use the standard for calculation).

    I didn't write down the EDR, but as you can see in the photos, my BTU calculation comes in at 165,494. If this is accurate, then why on Earth would my home have a 400k BTU boiler?

  • EdTheHeaterMan
    EdTheHeaterMan Member Posts: 9,378

    Steam boiler are rated in Sq.Ft.

    You match the Sq. Ft. of the total of the radiators to the Sq. Ft. of the boiler.

    Now I need to do some math to double check your numbers.

    Edward Young Retired

    After you make that expensive repair and you still have the same problem, What will you check next?

    LegendsCreek
  • mattmia2
    mattmia2 Member Posts: 10,923

    If you add a 30% pickup factor and figure 80% efficiency you get about 275,000 btu/hr so probably a size or 2 smaller would be the boiler you'd pick based on the EDR rating of the boiler which has the pickup factor and efficiency baked in. (assuming the 400k btu/hr is the input). The install looks like it was done by someone that knew a little about steam but not a lot so they probably either sized on the old boiler(that boiler looks old enough that the previous boiler likely was the coal boiler) or were afraid to pick something too small. You almost certainly will be fine and have a system that runs better with a 10% or less pickup factor but inexperienced pros get nervous about that. What I might do since it is oil it pick the boiler that the EDR on the ratings plate says is the right one and downfire the burner to the actual EDR plus the efficiency plus a small pickup factor, that way you can always increase the firing rate of the burner if you end up short, but I doubt you'll end up short.

    LegendsCreekethicalpaul
  • EdTheHeaterMan
    EdTheHeaterMan Member Posts: 9,378
    edited September 11

    By using the numbers from a 5 tube radiator from the chart to calculate an actual 4 tube radiator will get you the incorrect EDR per section. That is because four 1" diameter tubes have less surface area than five 3/4" tubes. Just because the outside overall dimension of a 5 tube on the chart matches the overall dimension of a 4 tube radiator you have on site, does not make the EDR number you selected correct.

    You need to get as close as you can with your actual dimensions to the chart dimensions.

    If you can not get close, then you need to let Charlie do it, because he has a book called Every Darn Radiator that has more options that the WM rule of thumb guide you are using.

    This is what I came up with:

    but I could be wrong. I would check the middle radiator dimensions where the 8" wide radiator has 4 tubes and the 6" radiator also has 4 tubes. They are two different manufacturers of radiator and may not be on your WM Boiler Sizing Guide.

    Using the same chart and numbers, my calculation is ~9000 BTUh more than yours.

    You can clearly see the SqFt NET rating in the boiler specifications. That is the number that we use to select the proper size boiler. In this WM model EG boiler, the 7 section (less expensive than the 8 Section) has a NET AHRI of 185,000 BTU with a gross input rating of 299,000 BTU

    If a different manufacturer has a 275,000 BTU input, that one will be closer

    And with all the input, output, gross, and net BTU number to confuse you, I would stick with the SqFt rating of the boiler. EASY PEZY!

    Edward Young Retired

    After you make that expensive repair and you still have the same problem, What will you check next?

    ethicalpaul
  • LegendsCreek
    LegendsCreek Member Posts: 79
    edited September 11

    Thanks again @EdTheHeaterMan ! I double checked the questionable radiator, and it is indeed 8" wide with 5 tubes, not 4. I also realized I messed up on the current boiler BTU and remember why I got messed up.

    My oil company told me repeatedly that I'd need a 400k BTU replacement (I've been discussing replacing it with them since I bought the house). They never even measured my radiators. That 400k number has stuck in my head. I went down tonight and took a photo of the tag, and it's lower than 400k. I'm attaching a photo.

    Regarding all the 6" radiators, all I had to go off of was the chart I printed out, and none of them with 4 tubes offered 6" as an options, so I upped it to the 7". I'll see what Charlie thinks about it tomorrow (he's heading my way at some point). I am very curious to see what he thinks. I've got a feeling that whomever installed the system may not have been too knowledgeable about steam!

    Oh, and I think I mentioned in my other thread that when I moved in there was a massive asbestos covered coal boiler that was previously tied into this one. I had an asbestos company come up and remediate it all, and they also took the coal boiler for scrap.

    mattmia2
  • Jamie Hall
    Jamie Hall Member Posts: 24,842

    The number you are looking for is the line "Net 1004 sq. ft. steam" That's the number to compare to the total EDR of your radiators.

    In your case, it looks as though down fired the boiler, which is acceptable within certain ranges, from 2.75 gph to 2.25 gph. That would mean the actual rating would be about 820 square feet. All losses and actual efficiency are included in that number.

    Br. Jamie, osb
    Building superintendent/caretaker, 7200 sq. ft. historic house museum with dependencies in New England
  • Steamhead
    Steamhead Member Posts: 17,380

    Another thing to check is the radiator section spacing. The standard large-tube (just "tube type" on that chart) is 2-1/2". This is the distance from the center of one section to the center of the next one.

    If the spacing is 1-1/2" or 1-3/4", that is a "thin tube" type.

    If the spacing is 2", it's probably one of the original American Corto rads. The chart for these can be found here:

    https://www.heatinghelp.com/assets/documents/American-Radiator-Co-Corto-1922.pdf

    Post a pic of anything you're not sure of.

    All Steamed Up, Inc.
    Towson, MD, USA
    Steam, Vapor & Hot-Water Heating Specialists
    Oil & Gas Burner Service
    Consulting
  • AdmiralYoda
    AdmiralYoda Member Posts: 683
    edited September 12

    Just to drive the point home, with steam we don't need to worry about btu's. Calculate the EDR of all the radiators and you pick a boiler that matches the EDR load. The 30% pick up factor is built in. With good pipe insulation we can live with a little less pick up factor so if had to choose, I'd pick a boiler that is slightly smaller vs slightly bigger.

    For example if you calculated your total radiator EDR to be 700 and you had to choose between a boiler that had 675 sq.ft or 750 sq.ft of capacity, I'd pick the 675 one.

    The only time to worry about btu is if you are doing new construction or something. I am adding a room off the side of my house so I need to calculate its heat loss in btu's/hr and came up with 7,000. To convert the btu to EDR you divide by 240. So the radiator in my new room needs to have an EDR of 29ish. My boiler is oversized already to it works out good.

    For existing construction just add up the EDR of your radiators and that is the capacity of steam (sq. ft) you need.

    LegendsCreek
  • ethicalpaul
    ethicalpaul Member Posts: 6,660

    Please listen to everybody above and stop thinking and working in BTU. It's just too easy to get confused when talking to your contractor. Make them and yourself work in "Net Sq Ft of Steam" and save yourself so many headaches.

    NJ Steam Homeowner.
    Free NJ and remote steam advice: https://heatinghelp.com/find-a-contractor/detail/new-jersey-steam-help/
    See my sight glass boiler videos: https://bit.ly/3sZW1el

    Grallert
  • Charlie from wmass
    Charlie from wmass Member Posts: 4,372

    He has 792 square feet of edr

    Cost is what you spend , value is what you get.

    cell # 413-841-6726
    https://heatinghelp.com/find-a-contractor/detail/charles-garrity-plumbing-and-heating
    mattmia2LegendsCreekethicalpaulEdTheHeaterMan
  • SlamDunk
    SlamDunk Member Posts: 1,670

    Fuel savings!

    LegendsCreek