Underperforming system in cold temps
Comments
-
"As temp increased at manifold, flow deteriorated. When temp got back to 110 degrees at manifold flow was back to near nothing."
This has me thinking a thermostatic valve somewhere is closing.
"Turning off all loops at the manifold except for one resulted in approx .4GPM through that single loop even with it full open. Opening all loops results in negligible flow at all."
That has me thinking you're getting the same 0.4 GPM either way, but when it's spread over 17 loops it's too small to measure.
0 -
“That has me thinking you're getting the same 0.4 GPM either way, but when it's spread over 17 loops it's too small to measure.”
Yes Sir I agree. Which brings me back to the primary and Taco three way valve. Not enough hot water is getting through.
I’m taking all of those taco valve filters off to rule that out as the primary issue.
0 -
”Filling it shouldn't be a regular event once you have it running.”
That’s true…
0 -
any time you fill, refill, purge the hydronic system, run it through a micron filter water filter. I have one of these with hose connections that I use on my purge cart. Fill the system through this to catch the well debris.
Although you don’t want that grit in your plumbing system either.
I had a 20” Big Blue filter on my well system. Changed the filter yearly.
But don’t irrigate through a filter🤨
Bob "hot rod" Rohr
trainer for Caleffi NA
Living the hydronic dream1 -
"With a boiler rated at 137,500 BTU/hr, a back-of-the-envelope load calculation of 135,000 BTU/hr and a temperature at 76% of the delta of the design day, I'd expect the boiler to be running 76% of the time or so. Is that "near constantly"?
Yes sir I’d say that’s accurate…"
Let me make a generous assumption here that you are getting a delta T through the loops of 30 degrees F. Now — our dear old hydronic equation says that to move 137,000 BTUh through a system with a delta T of 30 you need to be moving about 9 gpm of water.
You quote 0.4 gpm.
You also state that the house is at least vaguely comfortable.
0.4 gpm of flow, even with a 30 F delta T, gives me 6,000 BTUh. No way is that keeping the house above freezing, never mind vaguely comfortable. Further, that boiler would only have to run about 3 minutes out of each hour to produce that heat, rather than perhaps 45 minutes out of each hour as your answer to the question implies.
Something does not compute.
I hate to even ask, but is it remotely possible that the flow meters aren't reading correctly?
Br. Jamie, osb
Building superintendent/caretaker, 7200 sq. ft. historic house museum with dependencies in New England0 -
”I hate to even ask, but is it remotely possible that the flow meters aren't reading correctly?”
It’s possible that there was small amount of flow through the lines , but not enough to register on the gauges. I agree there would be no way the house would be comfortable if there was zero flow through the lines at all.
I will say that when I said I closed all the loops except for one, that was just on the two manifolds I was standing in front of - so on that third manifold there were an additional 5 loops open , with those zones also calling for heat. So… some additional flow there most likely.
per @hot_rod recommendation,
I just finished removing the Taco valve filters completely and turned everything back on. Right now the supply water temp is still cool but I’m getting nearly .6gpm through every loop that’s open.
if after the water heats up and I’m getting 110 degrees to the manifold and I’m still getting that flow rate, I’ll be embarrassed - but glad that the problem is solved (contaminated water with an ultra fine filter). I’ve been convinced that this isn’t the only issue because I’ve never gotten design flow rates even immediately after cleaning the filters.I’m anxious to see if these flow rates remain high when this water temp increases.
0 -
"I hate to even ask, but is it remotely possible that the flow meters aren't reading correctly?"
The burner is burning, the rooms aren't cold. It seems likely that the flow is in fact adequate.
0 -
- Elusive problem!
- You have cleaned the Y strainer.
- You have flushed the air/dirt/hydraulic separator, and this flushed well.
- You have cleaned the filters on mixing valves.
- You are getting good flow when mixing valve on full cold.
Just to verify, the actuators are installed on taco mixing valves in correct orientation? (i cannot follow supply return completely behind the vents).
My deductive reasoning suggests an obstruction in your secondary loop, between hydraulic separator and the mixing valves. Is it possible those pipes are full of sand/grit. Can you flush out just the secondary loop using high pressure/flow?
0 -
.6 gpm should be plenty to get the job done, unless you have some very high load areas.
Next step would be to bump supply temperature 5 or so degrees
Bob "hot rod" Rohr
trainer for Caleffi NA
Living the hydronic dream0 -
”The burner is burning, the rooms aren't cold. It seems likely that the flow is in fact adequate.”
Not adequate enough to satisfy the call for heat for a single zone over the entire night, though.
The design calls for a rough average of .5gpm through the loops. The gauges were barely off the stops.
0 -
”Just to verify, the actuators are installed on taco mixing valves in correct orientation? ”
Yes those are correct, thank you - I verified that and researched dip switch settings multiple times last year - good call to check those.
I think your thought was correct about the water quality and contamination between hydraulic sep and the taco valves
0 -
.6 GPM per zone, I'd agree. But it's 17 zones. My understanding is he's seeing .6 for the whole system.
With a 20F delta, 137 kBTU/hr means 13.7 GPM for the system.
0 -
Does that grundfos (43 watts in photo) also give a gpm estimate? What does it show for gpm when mixing valve is on full hot? And on full cold? Does this supply one of the manifolds in question?
How accurate do you all think the gpm estimate on that circulator is?
0 -
My point exactly. The boiler is running. That means that heat is being input. The boiler is not reaching extreme temperatures. That means that the heat is going somewhere. Where? And how is it getting there? Even if we allow 0.6 gpm for the whole system, that' still only 6000 BTUh out of the 130,000 BTUh the boiler is putting out.
As I said, this just doesn't compute. Sorry.
Br. Jamie, osb
Building superintendent/caretaker, 7200 sq. ft. historic house museum with dependencies in New England0 -
Fellas, as of right now it appears that the problem is solved. I’m embarrassed about it - I knew the filters would get partially blocked, but I never suspected it was the main issue based on having the same problem so quickly after cleaning the filters. Maybe the filters themselves are too restrictive…
That being said, since the system was installed I’ve never seen temps over 100 at the manifold with .6gpm being allowed to flow through every loop.
With a partially clogged filter I was getting hot temps at the manifold, but it seems apparent that I wasn’t getting enough volume of hot water through the filters for the pump to push through each loop. This explains why when I manually adjusted the valve to allow more cold return water to the pump, I’d see much improved flow at the manifold.
Hopefully this water isn’t so bad that it will damage the components. I think I’ll hope that it will be okay for awhile until I have time to flush, clean it out with a hydronic cleaner, fill with clean water (not from the well) and add Fernox F1.
If any of you are ever driving through northern Illinois north of Rockford along the Wisconsin border, drinks are on me. Thank you all for your help this forum is a great resource.
-Dan
Sukhoi29SU @ gmail
1 -
”.6 GPM per zone, I'd agree. But it's 17 zones. My understanding is he's seeing .6 for the whole system.”
No, no. Right now after removing the filters I’m seeing .6GPM at each loop. Prior to removing the filters I was barely indicating any flow at each loop.
9 zones total. 27 loops. 10 of those loops for garage, so correct - 17 loops for the house.
17 loops and 7 zones for the house2 -
-
“Does that grundfos (43 watts in photo) also give a gpm estimate? What does it show for gpm when mixing valve is on full hot? And on full cold? Does this supply one of the manifolds in question?”
yes sir it does, however that is the pump that pushes water to the two garage floors.The black pump above it is the one for the house - and that does not show GPM. The designer told me to set it at auto adapt however I never did that because I was experiencing flow issues I always have it set to max
1 -
-
-
after a couple hours of sufficient flow through the floors I can finally acknowledge that this system might be worth all the $ I put into it. A few of the zones have already reached the temp set on the thermostat and aren’t calling for heat anymore. I suspect all of them will reach that soon as the temp is 110 at the manifold now, and still holding flow. Cleaning out the system with a proper cleaner and adding proper water with ph treatment will be the next step, followed by hooking up the wood gasification boiler once Switzer delivers it.
next question : do I dare dial back the flow rates at the manifolds on the zones that are spec’d for less? For instance I see the lower great room is only spec’d for a little less than .3GPM and it’s currently getting .6GPM? Or is the higher flow rate generally better and more efficient if I can get it?
@Jamie Hall I wanted to also say that your thoughts were correct - as I was walking through the house checking thermostats I noticed that the kids had turned back in the air heat pump in the lower level. So last night although I might have been getting little and insufficient flow through the pex tubes , the kids were supplementing some heat in the lower level with the heat pump and air. That would explain why the temperatures didn’t drop more in the house overnight. It wasn’t enough to get the temperatures up to kick off the radiant call for heat, but I’m sure it helped in the overall…
0 -
-
I dialed back the boiler to just above design temp as there is a long way to travel to some of the manifolds and I will expect some heat loss as it travels to manifolds.
I’ll dial the flow rates back to design specs which is something I was fearing I’d never have to worry about.
Thank all of you guys for the time and advice/input
0 -
i thought the radiant temperature was being modulated by the Taco 3 way valve on ODR?
With adequate flow now, I would dial in those valves to give you near constant circulation and lowest SWT
Bob "hot rod" Rohr
trainer for Caleffi NA
Living the hydronic dream0 -
”i thought the radiant temperature was being modulated by the Taco 3 way valve on ODR?”
yes that’s true, dip switch settings allow for a max of 130 degree water. I don’t know what I was thinking with heat loss between boiler and manifold- the max temp leaving those valves is 130 so I can expect a bit less than that at manifold - so I can probably dial the boiler back to that 130 temp.
0 -
I thought bayou had some high temperature zones on the boiler also?
Bob "hot rod" Rohr
trainer for Caleffi NA
Living the hydronic dream0 -
”I thought bayou had some high temperature zones on the boiler also?”
Not following, sorry.
are you saying that you thought there were zones in the system directly off the boiler that would require a higher temp than 120?
one of those taco three way valves controls the temp to the house zones. The other taco three way controls the temp to the two garage floors.
he has the house design temp set at 120, and the garage floors design temp at 100, however the dip switch settings allow for either 130 or 110. I could probably adjust the garage taco valve dip switch settings to allow for a max of 110 degree water vs 130.0 -
I see, the extra connections are to tie in the wood boiler, not a high temperature zone?
So you do need those 3 way mix valves in the system once the wood boiler supplies 180 temperature.
Correct, the garage slab should not need 130 SWT, ever.
Bob "hot rod" Rohr
trainer for Caleffi NA
Living the hydronic dream0 -
is this the wood boiler you are getting?
If it is 800 gallons, you will need a substantial expansion tank in the system. I believe that is a closed pressurized boiler?
So a 90 gallon diaphragm type or about a 175 gallon plain steel compression tank
Bob "hot rod" Rohr
trainer for Caleffi NA
Living the hydronic dream0 -
“is this the wood boiler you are getting?”
Yes Sir, that is it - only I’m getting a 1750 gal, not listed on his website. It takes up some real estate but I’ve read great things about his boilers.
I’ve considered putting a heat exchanger between the wood boiler and the radiant system - I’m not sure how much efficiency I’ll lose, however.
This boiler does batch burns and I’m hoping I have to fire up the boiler once every couple of days for both DHW and heating. Once every day on cold days.
“So a 90 gallon diaphragm type or about a 175 gallon plain steel compression tank”
I did purchase an extra expansion tank not listed in the plans, however, I don’t think I got anything that big… I’ll have to check what I ended up getting after someone recommended me one awhile back.Picture is of a smaller model off of his website.
0 -
“I see, the extra connections are to tie in the wood boiler, not a high temperature zone?”
Yes, those connections to the top left will run to the wood boiler on the opposite corner of the room.
0 -
Let's see. 1750 gallons. You can probably safely heat it to about 200F and get usable heat down to 110F. So 1750 gallons times 8.3 pounds per gallon times 90F equals 1,307,250 BTU. So about ten hours worth of boiler output.
0 -
for 1750 gallons you need a 305 gallon compression tank, or a bladder tank of 147 gallons, which weighs about 500 lbs empty!
Bob "hot rod" Rohr
trainer for Caleffi NA
Living the hydronic dream0 -
Now that the water flow issues are resolved - I have another question about water temps, please.
Overall system performing much better now that I have more flow through the lines. But I’ve noticed that I’m not getting very hot water to the manifolds.
Very cold day today in northern Illinois. -13 this AM with wind chills -30. Majority of zones calling for heat but house is comfortable- just a couple degrees cooler than what is called for at thermostats.
Per recommendation here I dialed the floor heating side of the boiler down - since
Taco 3 way valve dip switch settings are set to allow a max of 130 degree water through to the secondary. But I’m seeing about a max temp of 90 degrees getting to the manifolds. Troubleshooting I turned both dip switches 1 and 2 to the off setting, which shouldn’t restrict the water temp at all. I turned the boiler up to 150 but I’m still getting the same 90 degrees to the manifolds .
At the 150 boiler setting the boiler fired up and ran for 8 minutes or so and then stopped firing and sat idle for a few minutes and then fired up again to 150 for another 8 minutes or so. With a call for heat I would expect the boiler to continue running steady and supply hot water until the call for heat was met? It’s almost like that boiler fired up and the water in the primary side was hot but the taco valves weren’t letting that hot water in so the boiler shut down for a few minutes ? No flashing lights or abnormal indications on the taco valves nor the boiler.
Boiler output not a concern, every 25-30 minutes the boiler fires up to 185 or so for DHW purposes and the copper pipe leading to DHW tank is very hot to the touch. But when boiler fires up for floors, the lines on the primary side don’t feel very hot. If the boiler is set to fire up to 150 , shouldn’t I get 150 degree water at the taco three way valve to be mixed with the colder return water, to produce (130 degree) water to the secondary? It seems like regardless of boiler temp setting, that the same temp of water is getting sent through the primary to the taco valves.
I have sensors from the taco valve onto the supply lines going to manifolds. There’s also an outdoor sensor - and I have the reset ratio set to about 1.0. ( .7 is per the design, I upped it a little to try and get hotter heater to manifolds during these super cold temps).Another observation is that the taco valves seem to resort to about same valve setting when power is removed and reapplied with different settings (such as dip switch settings being turned to off).
I’m confused as to why if all zones are calling for heat that the boiler wouldn’t stay fired up consistently, at least until the DHW needed to fire up to the 185. Why would it fire up for 8 minutes, go to idle, and then fire back up again? Even with no restrictions on the dip settings i’m not getting the hot water temp set on the boiler over to the taco valves. It looks like I’m maybe getting 110 degree to the taco valves. Any ideas? Thank you again
0 -
90 degree supply temp , 80 degree return
0 -
Does the supply pipe going into the mixing valve feel like it is 150F?
And is that the supply pipe coming from the top or bottom in that photo with the Taco mixing valve?
I don't see the "supply sensor" going into the taco mixing vavle. Is it just bent over and not visible in photo? where is that sensor on your piping? What is that wire nut connecting?
Looks like someone has been fairly aggressive with a screwdriver on that mixing valve.
1 -
Feel Like?
0 -
can you power down that mix valve an manually open it full open?
Bob "hot rod" Rohr
trainer for Caleffi NA
Living the hydronic dream0 -
is the valve installed in the proper direction?
I see the actuator is removable, so you could manually open it.
Bob "hot rod" Rohr
trainer for Caleffi NA
Living the hydronic dream0 -
I went and took a couple more pictures that should give a better ‘big picture’.
The boiler fired up to 150 only gives me approx 110 water right out of the boiler. I circled in red the two gauges that are registering approx 110 while the boiler shows 150. Right now I actually have 100 degree water at the manifold - I’m not sure what changed other than it warmed up a few degrees outside. It’s still very cold.
Fortunately the house is comfortable at 70 degrees or more , so the system is actually working well despite the lower than ideal temps at the manifold.
Am I understanding the system correctly though in that if the boiler is 150 degrees it should send that temp water to the taco valve to mix ? Or is there a sensor or setting that would tell the boiler to send cooler water towards the secondary despite being fired up higher? Despite the system generally doing a nice job keeping the house warm in really cold temps, I want to make sure I’m doing it efficiently as possible. Thanks again.
yes good eye, I think someone might have been trying to adjust that reset ratio with too thick a screwdriver at one point - prolly me frustrated with trying to troubleshoot the system a couple years ago.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 86.7K THE MAIN WALL
- 3.1K A-C, Heat Pumps & Refrigeration
- 54 Biomass
- 423 Carbon Monoxide Awareness
- 101 Chimneys & Flues
- 2K Domestic Hot Water
- 5.6K Gas Heating
- 102 Geothermal
- 158 Indoor-Air Quality
- 3.5K Oil Heating
- 66 Pipe Deterioration
- 934 Plumbing
- 6.2K Radiant Heating
- 384 Solar
- 15.3K Strictly Steam
- 3.3K Thermostats and Controls
- 54 Water Quality
- 43 Industry Classes
- 47 Job Opportunities
- 17 Recall Announcements