Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.
Need to contact us? Visit https://heatinghelp.com/contact-us/.
Click here to Find a Contractor in your area.

High pressure boiler design

ChrisJ
ChrisJ Member Posts: 16,316
This really isn't the right forum for this, but I figured I'd run it up the flag pole.

If I were to design and build a small steam boiler intended to run around 200 PSI how would I go about getting it tested to make sure it's safe? What pressure would I want to actually design it around, 400 PSI?

Single pipe 392sqft system with an EG-40 rated for 325sqft and it's silent and balanced at all times.

Comments

  • Jamie Hall
    Jamie Hall Member Posts: 24,865
    400 psi would be good, @ChrisJ . The high pressure boilers I've played with -- railroad steam engines -- are tested hydrostatically; that is with water pressure. A lot safer and better than air, since although water does compress -- a little -- and the boiler does expand -- a little -- if something breaks the pressure is off immediately, with no expansion to throw the bits around the shop (which can ruin your whole day). Further, a leak is obvious -- the water pressure drops dramatically.
    Br. Jamie, osb
    Building superintendent/caretaker, 7200 sq. ft. historic house museum with dependencies in New England
  • ChrisJ
    ChrisJ Member Posts: 16,316
    edited May 2019

    400 psi would be good, @ChrisJ . The high pressure boilers I've played with -- railroad steam engines -- are tested hydrostatically; that is with water pressure. A lot safer and better than air, since although water does compress -- a little -- and the boiler does expand -- a little -- if something breaks the pressure is off immediately, with no expansion to throw the bits around the shop (which can ruin your whole day). Further, a leak is obvious -- the water pressure drops dramatically.

    Would you think this is a test I can perform and trust, or would it need to go to a shop specialized in such a task?

    Single pipe 392sqft system with an EG-40 rated for 325sqft and it's silent and balanced at all times.

  • STEVEusaPA
    STEVEusaPA Member Posts: 6,505
    Wouldn't you want (need) an engineering stamp (of approval)?
    Don't they usually test things to failure? If you're doing that, make a video (remotely of course).

    Keep in mind with the old steam locomotives, they had to be completely ripped apart and rebuilt quite frequently, but that was due them rotting out via constant fresh water.

    Maybe if the Wall has someone who worked on an aircraft carrier, they could weigh in on high pressure steam/testing/maintenance.

    Sounds like a job for MythBusters (are they still on the air).

    There was an error rendering this rich post.

  • ChrisJ
    ChrisJ Member Posts: 16,316
    edited May 2019

    Wouldn't you want (need) an engineering stamp (of approval)?
    Don't they usually test things to failure? If you're doing that, make a video (remotely of course).

    Keep in mind with the old steam locomotives, they had to be completely ripped apart and rebuilt quite frequently, but that was due them rotting out via constant fresh water.

    Maybe if the Wall has someone who worked on an aircraft carrier, they could weigh in on high pressure steam/testing/maintenance.

    Sounds like a job for MythBusters (are they still on the air).

    I'm looking into building a small model steam engine for my own use.

    I don't think it needs any stamps.
    I just want to know without a doubt that it's safe.

    Single pipe 392sqft system with an EG-40 rated for 325sqft and it's silent and balanced at all times.

  • KC_Jones
    KC_Jones Member Posts: 5,840
    @ChrisJ to certify this you need an approved shop to test and sign off, even with that the approved shop is required to have an Authorized Inspector sign off (in most cases). We don't do boilers here, but we are a Section VIII U2 stamped pressure shop with certified welders etc. We self certify for production, but are required to have periodic inspections and every design gets tested to failure (burst test) prior to approval of anything.

    The test pressure is a function of the design or operating pressure and a multiplier for the temperature the unit will operate at. Since the test is at ambient the safety factor gets adjusted for different temperatures. For us that typically means testing to 7-8 times the design pressure and we test to failure (burst). I am not an expert, but have been witness to several of these tests and inquired about many aspects. I'm sure I've missed some details here.
    2014 Weil Mclain EG-40
    EcoSteam ES-20 Advanced Boiler Control
    Boiler pictures updated 2/21/15
    STEVEusaPA
  • EBEBRATT-Ed
    EBEBRATT-Ed Member Posts: 16,490
    I doubt that ASME applies to something that small and I don't think you need any stamps or approval.

    Build it and test it at double your operating pressure. Put some type of safety valve on it

    Have to look in ASME, I am sure their is an exception for small stuff.

    I would look on other model builders site for more info. This has been done before
  • Solid_Fuel_Man
    Solid_Fuel_Man Member Posts: 2,646
    It certainly is easier to build something small and strong than it is something big and strong. Funny how surface area works.

    How big are you talking Chris? Most steam engines operate at the 100-150 psi range. Are you thinking of a water tube design?
    Serving Northern Maine HVAC & Controls. I burn wood, it smells good!
  • STEVEusaPA
    STEVEusaPA Member Posts: 6,505

    ...Most steam engines operate at the 100-150 psi range...

    That's what I was getting at. Is he trying to flick 45000 lb jet fighters off of a ship? :)
    I'd have redundant safeties and relief valves...

    Keep us posted, I'm curious.

    There was an error rendering this rich post.

    ChrisJ
  • jumper
    jumper Member Posts: 2,385
    Authorities made me do a hydrostatic cold water test at 150% of stamped rating. Popped some stays. At the time I was irate because boiler operated at 0 psig . But the law was that if stamp says 50 then one must test for 75 psi. Always tried to avoid pressure vessels ever since.

    For home made 200 psi I'd use containment vessel.

  • ChrisJ
    ChrisJ Member Posts: 16,316
    > @Solid_Fuel_Man said:
    > It certainly is easier to build something small and strong than it is something big and strong. Funny how surface area works.
    >
    > How big are you talking Chris? Most steam engines operate at the 100-150 psi range. Are you thinking of a water tube design?

    Small.... Maybe a gallon or two.

    Not sure on what design yet either.

    Right now I'm trying to see what my options are.

    Single pipe 392sqft system with an EG-40 rated for 325sqft and it's silent and balanced at all times.

  • AMservices
    AMservices Member Posts: 610
    I see where your going with this.
    Modified pressure cooker with 1/4" copper lines going to PRV at radiator inlet. Steam traps, boiler feed pump, bada bing! Low mass steam boiler.

    Am I getting warm?
    ChrisJ
  • Danny Scully
    Danny Scully Member Posts: 1,440
    I’m thinking it’s something sneaky too @AMservices :lol:
    ChrisJ
  • ttekushan_3
    ttekushan_3 Member Posts: 961
    Tom Waits will help those of us with perhaps overly vivid imaginations. 😏

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0gCCJsjemU

    Terry T

    steam; proportioned minitube; trapless; jet pump return; vac vent. New Yorker CGS30C

    ChrisJ
  • ChrisJ
    ChrisJ Member Posts: 16,316
    > @ttekushan_3 said:
    > Tom Waits will help those of us with perhaps overly vivid imaginations. 😏
    >
    > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0gCCJsjemU
    >

    What's he building in there?
    There's a tire swing in a pepper tree. He has no children of his own you see.

    Single pipe 392sqft system with an EG-40 rated for 325sqft and it's silent and balanced at all times.

  • ttekushan_3
    ttekushan_3 Member Posts: 961
    And back to your original point, I remember a live steam guy telling me they typically did a 2X hydrostatic test on small scale tube type high pressure boilers.

    If your use allows for a water tube type to function reliably, it’s a lot less frightening in the event of a mishap.

    I’ve always asked myself “what’s the worst that could happen?” And as I get (much😀) older, that “worst” gets more informed as time goes on! Perhaps watching too many YouTube videos.

    Sounds fascinating and I hope you come up with something that does what you want. Working steam on any scale is a joy.

    Terry T

    steam; proportioned minitube; trapless; jet pump return; vac vent. New Yorker CGS30C

  • ratio
    ratio Member Posts: 3,791
    A while back I was thinking about something similar. Turns out you can get a manually operated hydrostatic test pump starting at less than 35 bucks for the Chinesium ones.

    I must have lost interest in the project though, as I don't seem to have one.

  • HVACNUT
    HVACNUT Member Posts: 6,334
    In the past I serviced Fulton high pressure 100 psi, oil down fired boilers for laundry cleaners. I really only did the burner and operating controls side of things but yearly state inspections needed to be done. To this day I hate hand holes and gaskets. When I got certified at Fulton in Pulaski NY, they showed a video of a boiler blasting off like a rocket and landing in a parking lot a block away. Be careful @ChrisJ .
    I joined this forum Feb of '17 and reading some of your topics, I've come to think you're some kind a mad scientist. 🔬🧪⚗🤯
    Solid_Fuel_Man
  • Jean-David Beyer
    Jean-David Beyer Member Posts: 2,666
    If I were to design and build a small steam boiler intended to run around 200 PSI how would I go about getting it tested to make sure it's safe? What pressure would I want to actually design it around, 400 PSI?


    When I used to hang out with live steam 12 inches to the foot scale model railroad locomotive enthusiasts, they had to be inspected annually by a representative of Hartford Steam Boiler Insurance Company (or some such name) to maintain their liability insurance. I know the pressure gauge on the locomotives went a little over twice the release pressure of the safety valves on the locomotives. I am pretty sure they operated their locomotives at 125 psi or a bit more. These were fire-tube boilers, but I do not think any had super-heaters. From time-to-time they had to replace the fire tubes and boiler stays. You do not want one of those things to explode. A 125 psi steam boiler exploding is way worse than the same volume compressed air tank operating at the same pressure; WAY WORSE. 125 psi steam is usually at about 350F.