Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.
Need to contact us? Visit https://heatinghelp.com/contact-us/.
Click here to Find a Contractor in your area.
If our community has helped you, please consider making a contribution to support this website. Thanks!

Y-Pipe strainers

Options
michaelmiracle
michaelmiracle Member Posts: 31

This is a hydronic boiler system in a school in Denver. The system is from the 1960's, the boiler and near boiler piping was replaced in 2015.

There is a Y-pipe strainer before the circulator and another after the circulator both 2" pipe. The one before (china) closes down to about 1 1/2" size strainer, the one above (Italy) does not. Just cleaned them out and the strainer above the circulator is without a strainer. The one below was fairly clogged with sludge after a year.

Question; should I do something different about this setup? Change the strainer to the larger one above the circulator, add a strainer to the one above, or leave it alone?

Comments

  • hot_rod
    hot_rod Member Posts: 27,705

    the ones above the pumps look like Y pattern swing check valves

    Bob "hot rod" Rohr
    trainer for Caleffi NA
    Living the hydronic dream
  • ChrisJ
    ChrisJ Member Posts: 17,481

    Are these pins / shoulder bolts what gives it away?

    screenshot-2026-04-22-at-12-27-09-e2-80-afpm.png

    Single pipe 392sqft system with an EG-40 rated for 325sqft and it's silent and balanced at all times.

  • Jamie Hall
    Jamie Hall Member Posts: 27,514

    The ones above the pumps aren't strainers — they are check valves. Or werent'. I hope the innards of the check valves are still there???

    Br. Jamie, osb
    Building superintendent/caretaker, 7200 sq. ft. historic house museum with dependencies in New England
  • michaelmiracle
    michaelmiracle Member Posts: 31
    edited April 22

    Ok. I see.

    Thanks for the help.

    Nothing inside them that I could see easily, But I will check again.

    edit: I read up a little and the cap is for 'easy maintenance'. What maintenance do these need?

  • 109A_5
    109A_5 Member Posts: 4,157

    Larger strainer(s) may give you a longer service interval.

    I think I would clean out the original strainer more often and see how it goes.

    At least the strainers are doing something, IMO they are installed wrong.

    image.png
    National - U.S. Gas Boiler 45+ Years Old
    Steam 300 SQ. FT. - EDR 347
    One Pipe System
    michaelmiracle
  • hot_rod
    hot_rod Member Posts: 27,705

    You may need to do a system flush, add clean water and a hydronic chemical if you have chronic sludge issues. A Y strainer that plugs will starve the pump of flow and can cause a pump failure.

    More and more systems are getting dirt separators instead of strainers. More capacity, better performance and easy to blow down.

    Typically one at the boiler return.

    Screenshot 2026-04-22 at 1.09.40 PM.png Screenshot 2026-04-22 at 1.09.55 PM.png Screenshot 2026-04-22 at 1.10.05 PM.png
    Bob "hot rod" Rohr
    trainer for Caleffi NA
    Living the hydronic dream
  • pumpcontrolguy
    pumpcontrolguy Member Posts: 46

    On Y strainers it's quite handy to put a blow down valve on them so you or building staff can blast out the shmutz more frequently, but like @109A_5 mentioned, they shouldn't really be installed upwards like that since they wont work properly that way

    michaelmiracle
  • EBEBRATT-Ed
    EBEBRATT-Ed Member Posts: 20,387

    The ones above the pumps are check valves for sure.

  • hot_rod
    hot_rod Member Posts: 27,705

    some things to avoid with circulator piping.

    No flow restricting devices on the inlet side


    A section of straight pipe upstream and downstream

    Pump away from an expansion tank

    A blow down valve is a good idea for occasionally serviced.

    If the system has sludge or magnetite you usually need to remove the strainer and scrub it clean. To fine of mesh can cause more problems than it solves.

    IMG_1489.jpeg
    Bob "hot rod" Rohr
    trainer for Caleffi NA
    Living the hydronic dream
  • michaelmiracle
    michaelmiracle Member Posts: 31

    Looks like my setup has several of those incorrect items.

  • EBEBRATT-Ed
    EBEBRATT-Ed Member Posts: 20,387

    I don't know why they don't want a check valve on the discharge.

  • hot_rod
    hot_rod Member Posts: 27,705

    two purposes tor the check, to prevent ghost flow when one pump is off , and to prevent reverse flow when one pump is off

    The piping has a bit to do with it also, primary secondary assures no pump interference when both are running

    That is not an ideal check for Hydronics, as it requires a pressure difference to seal tightly, and the long travel length can cause a hammer noise

    Other than that, it looks fine

    Bob "hot rod" Rohr
    trainer for Caleffi NA
    Living the hydronic dream
    Intplm.
  • Intplm.
    Intplm. Member Posts: 3,069

    A very good point. As shown in the above pictures, there is no flo-check. Ghost flow is surely occurring without flo-checks, not to mention water hammer.