Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.
Need to contact us? Visit https://heatinghelp.com/contact-us/.
Click here to Find a Contractor in your area.
If our community has helped you, please consider making a contribution to support this website. Thanks!

zone pumps to zone valve conversion.

Options
hot_rod
hot_rod Member Posts: 27,302

Generally the decision to zone with pumps or valves comes down to personal preference, and maybe past experiences.

When you see an installation with a wall of zone pumps, maybe 4 or more, that system is probably over-pumped. 6 zone pumps on an 80K boiler would be an example. All pumps running way to the bottom of their curve with wire to water efficiency below 20% on a common PSC type circulator.

With the acceptance and wide availability of ECM delta P type circulators, the potential to drop considerable power consumption and have better flow control over the zones could be an option.

A backup pump piped in or on the shelf could ease the worry of a single pump causing the entire system to be down.

Siggy had this thought so I built up a prototype.

Thoughts or suggestions?

Screenshot 2025-12-17 at 4.38.05 PM.png
Bob "hot rod" Rohr
trainer for Caleffi NA
Living the hydronic dream
GGrossHydronicMike

Comments

  • GGross
    GGross Member Posts: 1,840

    Was it very tricky to get the same port to port length as the pump or did you get it first try?

  • HydronicMike
    HydronicMike Member Posts: 321

    Pretty cool idea. I did something similar for flushing older systems. I made up a straight pipe with two flanges (connected to iso flanges) to flush the system, initial purge it, then swap out the blanks for circulators. To me I think it's a way to keep junk getting lodged into impellers.

  • hot_rod
    hot_rod Member Posts: 27,302

    pump spacers, handy for piping systems for the correct spacing

    Screenshot 2026-01-16 at 12.44.01 PM.png

    , too

    Bob "hot rod" Rohr
    trainer for Caleffi NA
    Living the hydronic dream
  • hot_rod
    hot_rod Member Posts: 27,302

    Yeah, it took a few flange brand tries:) This is where BSP threaded pipe shines, Loctite or hemp the threads and stop wherever you want.

    A copper sweat version is pretty easy to get "exact", but the sweat flanges are more$$

    Bob "hot rod" Rohr
    trainer for Caleffi NA
    Living the hydronic dream
  • bjohnhy
    bjohnhy Member Posts: 194

    Where do i put in an order for these?

  • GroundUp
    GroundUp Member Posts: 2,506

    Neat idea and all, but don't we need to repipe anyway to add a system circ?

  • jumper
    jumper Member Posts: 2,522

    I prefer pumps to valves, especially when pump has integral check valve. Can be difficult to find circulators small enough. Used to be positive displacement pumps sold for this purpose.

  • hot_rod
    hot_rod Member Posts: 27,302

    If you are using typical PSC wet rotor circs, even at the very best OP their efficiency is around 22%.

    If you are running"off curve" at one or the other end of the curve, you may be dropping down to 12% efficiency. My guess is most residential zone pumped systems are running at the low end of the pump curve. The same zone pump used regardless if the system needs 1 gpm or 10 gpm.

    Here is a typical 78W circ under 3 different flow conditions. The best condition #2 green curve hits the mid point of the curve, running 22% wire to water.

    #1 pumping 2.5 gpm is around 12%

    Screenshot 2026-01-28 at 8.20.29 AM.png

    If you swapped the PSC pump to ECM zone pump maybe go from 78 w down to 42W

    Assume 2200 hour of operation for 4 zone pumps =316 Kwh saving X (your cost per Kwh)

    Now with one ECM circ averaging 30W over the season and 4 - 40W ZV zone valves you are almost double the Kwh savings 586 Kwh

    As far as I know

    Efficiency Maine still has a $75 per ECM

    Mass Save $100

    Vermont, based on Wattage

    Minnesota Burlington Electric $100

    CT still has something.

    Bob "hot rod" Rohr
    trainer for Caleffi NA
    Living the hydronic dream
  • JimP
    JimP Member Posts: 99

    Thank you hot rod for ever you comment on here. Piping the zone valves that way is a nice idea to simplify a conversion.
    To groundup’s question…yes, and maybe a number of other controls might be added.
    We’ve been working with and improving a 24 zone system for 17 years. The installation we inherited was installed after a gut rehab in the late 80’s. Most the zone valves and piping are 30’ above the boilers. The piping between those floors is 2”. Originally there was no boiler or circulator control and the pump was a Taco 120. The “control” was hallway baseboard that was always on. (You can imagine the temperature of those interior halls).
    As soon as we started to control the zones we learned that the 120 pump was no good because it wouldn’t start (when a zone called for heat) after the pump became hot. This was an expensive and frustrating lesson. We solved this problem by installing two Taco 0010 pumps in parallel. This has the advantage of being able to use one pump when it’s mild outside. We also learned to add a separate 120v relay to turn the pumps on. The 120 pump would quickly burn out the single zone relay used to control the boiler and circulators (controlled by the zone valve end switches).
    We also piped in a B&G 100 circulator as an emergency backup. I try to exercise it once a year but don’t ever expect to need it. I only did it for the love of the work and it was a circulator I would have scrapped anyway:) I installed a 3/4” Taco differential bypass at the circulators. Last year I replaced that with a Callefi 1-1/4” differential bypass valve. I think that change is doing a much better job of smoothing things out.
    But the best improvement was relocating the zone valves down into hallway closets and installing Taco Zone Control switching relays.-wow they’re e nice! We experimented by adding 9 Taco Sentry zone valves in one cabinet. They seem to work okay so as we run out of parts to service the old 570 series heat motor zone valves we will replace them with Sentry valves.
    This system is all pretty’s low tech which I’m fine with. It requires hands on building management during the heating season which is something that I like to do.

  • EBEBRATT-Ed
    EBEBRATT-Ed Member Posts: 20,070

    How many people do you know that actually calculate the head loss on a system?

    Getting the GPM # is pretty easy. As long a people follow the "longest run and add 50% for fittings" it's just not accurate enough IMHO but the old bigger is better always holds so a lot of systems are over pumped, and I am sure many are under pumped and no one notices as the system balances at a higher delta.

    Every job I ever calculated worked fine and you can do it if you can see and measure the piping. Then comes the fact that fitting resistance (for the fittings) vary widely depending on who you believe.

    You can look at all kind of fitting charts and get different answers.

  • jumper
    jumper Member Posts: 2,522

    Theoretically one can measure system curve with variable speed pump. Then one replaces that pump with one chosen for efficiency. There still remains decision about variable control versus on•off for zones or coils. If on•off then there's the choice between valves or pumps. If valves still further choice between solenoid or motorized. You'll hear complaints about any of these combinations.