So because I have to replace my leaking boiler I intended to do a heat loss calc today which I've never done before, and was all ready for a frustrating internet search looking at different methods, followed by confusion and uncertainty — and then the post by @np_mdbr popped up with a ready made recipe:
I'm looking at replacing the HTP-EL150 that has had a bunch of problems (see my other posts for those adventures). The first thing I did was to run some heat load calculations. Instead of the more complicated and error-prone Manual-J calculation, I decided to use nearly three years worth of our LP purchase history combined with heating degree-day spreadsheets and the 99% outside design temperature in our area.
The results show that the 150k BTU boiler that we currently have is extremely oversized for what we're actually consuming in order to heat the home. My calculations indicate that a 50k BTU unit would more than cover our needs.
I'm leaning towards the Triangle Tube floor model INSFS110S (BTU Max Output of 110k).
Since that's such a large difference, I'm looking for additional pairs of eyes to poke holes in this calculation which I outline below:
- For a given period (2/25/22 thru 8/18/22) determine the number of gallons of LP consumed: 218.8g
- Determine therms contained within 218.8g of LP: 218.8 * 0.916 = 200.42 therms
- Determine therms delivered to the home: 200.42 therms * .91 = 183.05 therms (.91 is the assumed efficiency % of the HTP-EL150).
- Get the BTU value of therms delivered to the home: 183.05 * 100000 = 18305000 BTU
- Determine total BTU per degree-day for the time period: 18305000 / sum of the 60F degree-day values measured from the local airport over the time period in step 1: 9310.36
- Determine the BTU per degree-day hour: 9310.36 / 24 = 387.93
- Determine the implied heat load for the time period for 60F degree-days. Our 99% outside design temperature here is -4F. (60 - -4) * 387.93 = 24,827 BTU/hr.
I performed this calculation over 8 periods and ended up with an average BTU/hr rating of 29418 using the 60F degree-day data and 25919 using the 65F degree-day data. When you multiply these values by the ASHRAE 1.4x sizing factor you end up with 41185 for 60F data and 36287 for 65F data.
These numbers suggest that replacing the current 150k output boiler with another 150k output boiler would be extreme overkill. Even replacing with a 110k boiler (appears to be the smallest floor model Triangle Tube offers) indicates a very oversized installation!
I welcome thoughts on these calculations and thoughts on the Triangle Tube brand and model (110k) mentioned above!
I have questions similar to his, and it seemed like better etiquette for me to start a new thread, rather than ask questions about my situation in a thread that's supposed to be about his, even though the subject is the same.
For reference here is what I did trying to follow his steps. Skip to the result if you don't want to get a headache, but any close looks at it would be appreciated (apologies to those who just crunched his numbers too):
Total gallons #2 fuel oil past two years: g = 1211
Multiply g by 1.385 to get therms (fuel oil): T = 1677 therms
Multiply by .84 eff. for therms actually delivered: t = 1409 therms
Multiply t by 100,000 for BTUs: totBTU = 140,900,000 BTU
Sum of local degree days same period (fr. internet): dd = 11420
Divide totBTU by dd for BTU/degree-day: BTU/dd = 12337
Divide by 24 to get BTU/degree-day hour: BTU/d-h = 514
Multiply BTU/d-h by: (65F minus the local 99% outdoor design day temp. of 9 F, or 65-9 = 56 F), . so 514 x 56 = 28787 BTU/hr.
Okay, 29,000 BTU/hr, if I did all that right.
This result shocked me because my boiler is rated for over 100,000 BTU/hr., not sure if it's 115,000 or 100,000 (see photo below).
For reference, this is a two story cape, 30 yrs. old, modular, 1680 sq. ft. but with a heated garage and heated unfinished basement (where the boiler is), so I'd add 900 sq. ft. and just say it's 2500 sq. ft. Northeast climate, design temp 9 F. Four zones: 1st fl., 2nd, fl., garage, basement. The garage and basement thermostats are always turned all the way down, but the garage is leaky and I once measured it not getting above 44 degrees when it was colder outside, so I think I'm probably pumping a lot of excess BTUs into there that just go through the cracks. The upstairs rarely goes above low 60s unless we have guests, during the day it probably gets to the 50s. The boiler heats a 50 gal. indirect water heater.
I know rules of thumb are useless except maybe as sanity checks, so my sanity check is I read for the northeast for a decent house like mine might you could say 12 BTU/sq. ft., which would give 30,000 BTU/hr, so I guess I'm in the ballpark.
The above usage was for my 22 y.o. Weil-McLain P-WGO-3, oil, hydronic baseboard.
Can this really be the case? Was it common for boilers to be so oversized, if in fact mine is?
To pick a new boiler, by what factor should I multiply my 29,000 BTUs (if they're correct)? (Again, it's oil.)
Psychologically it's a bit hard to go from 100,000+ to much less, but I guess that's what I need to do? One boiler I've been looking at is 85,000 BTU, would that be okay?
And also, see the photo below, there are two numbers, it says:
"D.O.E. Htg. Cap. (Water), Btu/h 115,000"
and
"NET I = B = R RATING
Water, btu/hr ……….100,000"
What does all that mean and which is the actual rating?