Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.
Need to contact us? Visit https://heatinghelp.com/contact-us/.
Click here to Find a Contractor in your area.
Primary secondary pumping
I have a customer who has a pole barn set up for radiant floor heat that I am going to be installing the boiler for. I normally use primary secondary pumping with a “pumping away” module for piping layout on job with multiple zones and radiant floor heat. This however will be just one big zone of only radiant floor heat. I am trying to find out what would be the pros and cons of just piping as one zone the boiler is a high efficiency I can set water supply temp at 120° and the return temp will be what it will be. From what I’ve seen the lower the return water temp on high efficiency boilers the more efficient they are, so I’m not seeing the purpose of primary secondary pumping in this instance. Manufacture says the recommend primary secondary but can not give reason why..any thoughts?
What is the flow rate for the radiant?"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough"
Primary/Secondary piping "ensures" (if done right) that flow across the boiler is independent of flow happening in the heat distribution system. You have a lot more flexibility in remedying issues with Primary/Secondary.0
Directly pumping the system like that will add the resistance of the boiler’s heat exchanger to that of the system. You may need a larger circulator which usually costs more than what a standard one and a couple of Tees would. And then you still wouldn’t have the benefits of p/s.Bob Boan
You can choose to do what you want, but you cannot choose the consequences.0
I suppose I might go to 1 NRF36 vs 2 NRF25’s if I decide to not do p/s.0
Their manual shows the pressure drop for the various models.
I'd prefer a hydraulic separator as the first choice.
If you can assure flows you could direct pipe. Easier done with a non-zoned system like yours.Bob "hot rod" Rohr
trainer for Caleffi NA
Living the hydronic dream1
You'll have at least 22' of head if you direct pump that system. At 10+ gpm, that's stretching the upper limit of an NRF36. And it costs 3 times as much as an NRF 25. To me, it just makes more sense to do it p/s like the manual calls for.Bob Boan
You can choose to do what you want, but you cannot choose the consequences.2
11 GPM? How big is this building? Personally, I'll pipe a single zone pole shed like this direct every time as long as the MFG allows for it. 16ish feet of head at 11 GPM assuming 300ft loops of 1/2", but unless this is a 6000 sq ft building with an incredibly low heat loss, it doesn't need 11 GPM.0
3200 square feet (40X80) 13 parallel 250’ 1/2 circuits0
Mod cons have high pressure drops. So P/S piping ensures the boiler has the flow it needs.
If you pipe it direct you need a high head pump (system + boiler). Any glitch in the system calculations and the boiler doesn't see enough flow or you oversize the pump and choke it down
Those boiler don't hold hardly any water. I like to feel like I am not going to scorch the HX and want to know the boiler has what it needs. Weathe r the system does or not becomes a separate issue0
- 121.3K All Categories
- 84K THE MAIN WALL
- 2.9K A-C, Heat Pumps & Refrigeration
- 53 Biomass
- 417 Carbon Monoxide Awareness
- 40 Chimneys & Flues
- 1.7K Domestic Hot Water
- 4.8K Gas Heating
- 119 Geothermal
- 155 Indoor-Air Quality
- 3K Oil Heating
- 56 Pipe Deterioration
- 772 Plumbing
- 5.4K Radiant Heating
- 362 Solar
- 14K Strictly Steam
- 3K Thermostats and Controls
- 51 Water Quality
- 627 Buy, Sell, Barter
- 38 Industry Classes
- 73 Job Opportunities
- 19 Recall Announcements