Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.
Need to contact us? Visit https://heatinghelp.com/contact-us/.
Click here to Find a Contractor in your area.

test quest.

This question appears in a prep book for a civil service test. (Steamfitter)

  If a 2" diameter pipe discharges 20 gallons of fluid per minute, a 4" diameter pipe under similar conditions (such as internal friction and pressure head) would discharge APPROXIMATELY 64 gallons of fluid pre minute.

 It's a true/false question. Is there a formula to arrive at the answer?

Comments

  • moneypitfeeder
    moneypitfeeder Member Posts: 252
    try one of these

    There are several equations here, maybe one of them will help you.



    http://www.efunda.com/formulae/fluids/calc_pipe_friction.cfm#calc

    There was an error rendering this rich post.

  • Steve_210
    Steve_210 Member Posts: 647
    False

    Area of 4" is 6 times 2" ?
  • Jamie Hall
    Jamie Hall Member Posts: 24,864
    square

    the area of a pipe cross section is proportional to the square of the actual inside diameter.  If we assume that the actual inside diameter of a 4 inch pipe is 4 inches -- it isn't, but it's not too far off -- and that of a 2 inch pipe is 2 inches, then the proportion is as 16 (the square of 4) is to 4 (the square of 2); therefore the 4 inch pipe has 4 times the area of the 2 inch.



    To be more exact you would need to know the kind of pipe to which you are referring -- e.g. sched. 80 CI, Type K copper, ABS... etc. etc. and then look up the actual inside diameters for those nominal sizes.
    Br. Jamie, osb
    Building superintendent/caretaker, 7200 sq. ft. historic house museum with dependencies in New England
  • bob_46
    bob_46 Member Posts: 813
    Formula

    Q = A x V where Q = cubic feet per min. A = internal area of pipe in square feet and

    V = velocity in feet per min. Q x 7.48 will give answer in gallons per min.

    4" Sched. 40 has 3.77 times the area of 2" Sched. 40

    There was an error rendering this rich post.

This discussion has been closed.