Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.
Need to contact us? Visit https://heatinghelp.com/contact-us/.
Click here to Find a Contractor in your area.
If our community has helped you, please consider making a contribution to support this website. Thanks!

New jersey BFP required without feeder?

Options
ChrisJ
ChrisJ Member Posts: 17,019

I recall either reading something or hearing something about to a BFP not being required if you do not have an automatic feeder. Does anyone know if this is true in NJ? I wasn't able to find it in the plumbing code.

I'm getting tired of my BFP venting. It's tiny amounts that will probably never matter but I'm afraid it's going to bite me one day. If it's not actually required id feel better if I can get rid of it altogether.

I'm manual feed only.

Single pipe 392sqft system with an EG-40 rated for 325sqft and it's silent and balanced at all times.

Comments

  • HydronicMike
    HydronicMike Member Posts: 207

    If you manually feed and have shut offs on both sides of your BFP, might as well leave it in.

    I think it’s always going to release a little if you don’t keep pressure on both sides.

    Many boiler feed instructions say to not leave street pressure 'on', so I guess that means they are all supposed to be manual feed?

    ChrisJ
  • ChrisJ
    ChrisJ Member Posts: 17,019

    I used to shut the valve before it off, but I started thinking maybe I want to keep pressure to it.

    So I feed using the valve after it.

    Single pipe 392sqft system with an EG-40 rated for 325sqft and it's silent and balanced at all times.

  • ChrisJ
    ChrisJ Member Posts: 17,019
    1000021531.png

    This is what I'm using.

    Single pipe 392sqft system with an EG-40 rated for 325sqft and it's silent and balanced at all times.

  • EdTheHeaterMan
    EdTheHeaterMan Member Posts: 11,453

    I believe that the code requires a BFP even if you do not have an auto feed. The idea is to keep the boioer pressure from pushing water back into the potable system. This includes the village idiot that will open the manual boiler feed valve during a high pressure limit failure and a situation where the potable water is turned off so you have a boiler under higher pressure than the potable water system. The village idiot then opens the valve as a way of testing something that they know nothing about.

    Keep the BFP in there even if you never let the village idiot into your home. You never know who your kids might let in the house.

    Edward Young Retired

    After you make that expensive repair and you still have the same problem, What will you check next?

    ChrisJ
  • EBEBRATT-Ed
    EBEBRATT-Ed Member Posts: 19,172

    With steam and no auto feeder just a manual valve no BFP is required as far as I know. On a hot water boiler with a PRV a backflow is required.

    ChrisJ
  • Intplm.
    Intplm. Member Posts: 2,795

    It is also required by your local department of public health.

    BFP are required, auto feed or manual feed. It's not the style of how water gets into the boiler; it's what is potentially in the water that is the concern.

    ChrisJ
  • clammy
    clammy Member Posts: 3,239

    in new jersey a backflow is required on steam boilers feed line . To not have your backflow drip after manually feeding is to not remove pressure from the backflow so the real deal is to have a shut off before and after the backflow and use the out let valve for feeding this is nothing new and most who are not are being penny wise dollar foolish install this way and the customer ends up paying either way just less issues . It may seem uncommon but i have been doing it this way for many years yeah costs me 2 brass nipples and a ips ball valve big deal . this also holds true for house prv they should have a shut off before and after and unless you want o replace leave the pressure on to the valve and just use the outlet valve to shut the water off it will save you replacing the domestic prv being most prv fail after the pressure has been removed especially if a older valve .

    clammy

    R.A. Calmbacher L.L.C. HVAC
    NJ Master HVAC Lic.
    Mahwah, NJ
    Specializing in steam and hydronic heating

    ChrisJIntplm.
  • ChrisJ
    ChrisJ Member Posts: 17,019

    That's exactly how I've been doing it, as removing pressure from the BFP all of the time seemed like a bad idea. I don't remember what my reasoning for two valves was, I suspect it was recommended here on HH so I did it. I do exercise the inlet valve a few times a year, but I keep the feeding valve after the BFP closed while I do it.

    The amount it vents is so little I never realized it was even doing it until I put a clear hose on it that runs horizontally, so it holds drops for a while and gets white stains etc.

    But everyone's convinced me. I'll leave the BFP and just beef up my vent to deal with if there's a bad issue.

    Single pipe 392sqft system with an EG-40 rated for 325sqft and it's silent and balanced at all times.

  • hot_rod
    hot_rod Member Posts: 26,254

    Is your location under a State adopted code? Which one?

    There may be local codes that require a specific device

    In some areas if the country a non vented dual check is accepted.

    This non vented BFD has an ASSE 1024 listing, for example

    Your local plumbing inspector should know and be the final say?

    IMG_1372.png
    Bob "hot rod" Rohr
    trainer for Caleffi NA
    Living the hydronic dream
    ChrisJIntplm.
  • Intplm.
    Intplm. Member Posts: 2,795

    This ^^^^^^^^ is excellent if allowed by code. It's less problematic and will not leak like the RPZs that we are installing for boiler feed. Would very much like to see these approved, and why not as a combination auto-fill and BFP?

  • hot_rod
    hot_rod Member Posts: 26,254

    it comes down to how the inspector classifies boiler water. If it is filled with potable water, no chemicals, that could be considered low hazard. The ASSE 1024 is for low hazard applications.

    Mainly the inspector would be concerned about someone adding a cleaner or chemicals down the road.

    Then a BFD with a higher hazard level might apply. Either a vented dual check, or an RPZ with test ports.

    Lot of interpretation in accepting BFDs by AHJs. It is rare to see a code book site a specific BFD number.

    Bob "hot rod" Rohr
    trainer for Caleffi NA
    Living the hydronic dream
    Intplm.
  • mattmia2
    mattmia2 Member Posts: 15,067

    the michigan residential code specifies this


    P2902.5 Protection of Potable Water Connections

    Connections to the potable water shall conform to Sections P2902.5.1 through P2902.5.5.

    P2902.5.1 Connections to Boilers

    Where chemicals will not be introduced into a boiler, the potable water supply to the boiler shall be protected from the boiler by a backflow preventer with an intermediate atmospheric vent complying with ASSE 1012 or CSA B64.3. Where chemicals will be introduced into a boiler, the potable water supply to the boiler shall be protected from the boiler by an air gap or a reduced pressure principle backflow prevention assembly complying with ASSE 1013, AWWA C511 or CSA B64.4.

  • hot_rod
    hot_rod Member Posts: 26,254

    A 1012 will be a dual check with atmospheric vent.

    Screenshot 2025-11-10 at 6.49.26 PM.png

    Intermittent BFD spit can be cured with a swing check upstream, often.

    When a fast closing valve creates the shock that causes the BFD to flutter, the swing check catches that force and tends to cancel it.

    Of course you will hear that check slap.

    A water hammer arestor at the quick valves can help.

    Bob "hot rod" Rohr
    trainer for Caleffi NA
    Living the hydronic dream
    ChrisJ