Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.
Need to contact us? Visit https://heatinghelp.com/contact-us/.
Click here to Find a Contractor in your area.

What size pex tubing do you recommend?

MichaelT
MichaelT Member Posts: 27

This fall I will be tearing out the concrete for 3 car wash bays and redoing the radiant floor heat lines with O2 barrier PEX. The old concrete is falling apart and needs to all be replaced.

What size pex would be best? I was thinking to do 1/2 ID but also know that 5/8th inch pex delivers more BTUs efficiently.

Each bay is 33 feet by 18 feet. There are 2 bays west of the boiler room and one bay to the right of the boiler room.

This is just a snow melt system. I'm leaning towards doing 6 inch on center spacing but also considering doing 9 inch spacing.

Thank you for all the help!

Comments

  • hot_rod
    hot_rod Member Posts: 25,432

    For an ice melt system you would want 3/4" pex, 9" on center.

    What size boiler do you have to run this?

    Call; it 600 sq ft times 125- 150 BTU/ sq ft = 75- 90,000 btu/hr per bay

    Bob "hot rod" Rohr
    trainer for Caleffi NA
    Living the hydronic dream
  • GroundUp
    GroundUp Member Posts: 2,386

    Tube diameter has little to no effect on BTU output per SQ FT if properly installed. 1/2" is cheapest and easiest, and with only ~1800SF, 5 loops per bay at 250ft each w/ 6" OC is going to be more than adequate. There is absolutely no reason to run larger diameter, and anything wider than 6" OC would be a mistake.

  • So, each bay is 600 square feet x 125 BTU/square foot = 75,000 BTU. And you think that would work with ½" PEX?

    8.33 lbs./gal. x 60 min./hr. x 20°ΔT = 10,000 BTU's/hour

    Two btu per sq ft for degree difference for a slab
  • hot_rod
    hot_rod Member Posts: 25,432

    You need to move a lot of BTUs of cold glycol in a SIM. Uponor suggest 5/8 or larger tube. 1/2 maybe for some stair treads where loop lengths are very short, you need a tight spacing.

    Assuming the bays are covered you are designing more of an ice removal or anti-icing protection system, no real snow load to speak of.

    So the tube and spacing as well as loop length dictates and SWT/ gpm dictates how many BTUs you deliver.

    All the info about SIM design here.

    https://www.uponor.com/getmedia/50a684b6-091d-4044-b8f7-c06f7705668c/snow-and-ice-melting-design-and-installation-manual.pdf?sitename=USA

    Screenshot 2025-08-10 at 4.52.49 PM.png
    Bob "hot rod" Rohr
    trainer for Caleffi NA
    Living the hydronic dream
    mattmia2
  • GroundUp
    GroundUp Member Posts: 2,386

    125 BTU/SF is more than double what's needed to prevent ice buildup inside a wash bay (I own a 2 bay car wash and have installed radiant floors in roughly 20 others as well). With that said, yes; 1/2" would easily cover 125 BTU/SF. Tubing diameter matters not; tubing quantity is what makes the difference. 1/2" at 9" OC will put out roughly the same amount of BTU as 3/4" at 9" OC, the only benefit to larger diameter is slightly longer loops.

  • What delta do you design at?

    8.33 lbs./gal. x 60 min./hr. x 20°ΔT = 10,000 BTU's/hour

    Two btu per sq ft for degree difference for a slab
  • hot_rod
    hot_rod Member Posts: 25,432

    1.25 gpm, 200’, 1/2” loop with 40% PG around 20’ head

    IMG_0780.png

    300’ of 3/4 is about 1/2 that at 2 gpm


    pex manufacturers will do a design for you based on your location and needs

    Bob "hot rod" Rohr
    trainer for Caleffi NA
    Living the hydronic dream
  • GroundUp
    GroundUp Member Posts: 2,386

    With a cold start SIM system, a 20* delta is largely ridiculous to get any amount of BTU output regardless of tube size. Space heating, sure- but a cold start snowmelt will almost never hold a 20* delta while also doing its job properly. 50+* is not uncommon and there is absolutely no downfall to doing that, quite the opposite in fact. Maximized BTU output with minimized upfront cost and the highest possible efficiency, all great things.

    With that said, car wash systems typically don't need more than about 40-50 BTU/SF to keep the pads clear unless they never close the doors. Any respectable car wash closes down at about 0*, so my suggestion of 1/2" at 250ft is only a 15* delta at .8 GPM per loop, yielding 50 BTU/SF. This is not rocket science, guys.

  • Thanks for your patience in dumbing it down for us addled brainers, @GroundUp.

    8.33 lbs./gal. x 60 min./hr. x 20°ΔT = 10,000 BTU's/hour

    Two btu per sq ft for degree difference for a slab
    GroundUp
  • GroundUp
    GroundUp Member Posts: 2,386

    As I'm sure you are aware, tube diameter is not really relative to BTU output. A 1/2" tube at 100* will put out an almost identical amount of BTU to 3/4" at that same 100* in the same slab. 1/2" tubing at 6" spacing will put out considerably more BTU than 3/4" at 9" spacing, assuming the same temperatures which obviously vary by flow rate. Pressure drop in 250ft of 1/2" at .8 GPM is about the same as 375ft of 3/4" at 2 GPM so while there is potential to carry more BTU with the same pressure drop and fewer loops, larger diameter tubing does nothing for actual BTU output after the dust is settled if spacing and delta are equal. I would personally rather fight 1/2" at 6" spacing than 3/4" at 9" spacing, but maybe that's just me.

    Now if it's a large space like a 5000 SQ FT driveway with a 150 BTU/SF load, I'm all aboard the 3/4" train. In the case of a car wash however, there is not a chance I'm wrestling 3/4" when 1/2" is better from all aspects.

  • hot_rod
    hot_rod Member Posts: 25,432

    Missing from this discussion is an accurate load. Is it 50 or 150 btu/ sq ft?

    50 btu/‘ is a leaky or uninsulated home in New England🧐

    A hand wash bay without any doors, a wind tunnel, probably 100 btu or more.

    Location and typical winter temperatures goes into a design

    Large pex allows more gpm.= more btus transferred. That is why pex comes in multiple sizes

    You get one chance to get the tube right. Compromise and go with 5/8

    Bob "hot rod" Rohr
    trainer for Caleffi NA
    Living the hydronic dream
    GGrossAlan (California Radiant) Forbes
  • GroundUp
    GroundUp Member Posts: 2,386

    Yes, we would obviously need more details if it's not a regular car wash bay that gets shut down at a given temp, but that does not negate the fact that larger diameter tubing does not equal more BTU output per square foot. 1/2" at 6" spacing offers more BTU output capacity than 3/4" at 9" spacing, no matter how you slice it.

  • hot_rod
    hot_rod Member Posts: 25,432

    in that size bay, call it 600 sq ft

    3 - 300’ loops of 3/4, 9”oc $450

    6 - 200’ loop of 1/2, 12” oc $360

    using BlueFin heat pex online prices

    The 1/2 will take 6 port manifolds m, more connections, more ties and more install tie labor

    So $$ wise the 3/4 may be cheaper to have installed

    2 gpm in the 3/4 and 1 gpm in 1/2 is a wash on pump head, 12’ at 30% PG

    The output of a sq ft of concrete is based in its surface temperature. The 3/4” can move twice the flow to warm that sq ft.

    So knowing the btu load is important in the decision making

    If the 1/2 under performs you don’t have much wiggle room other then over-pumping the tube. A high head circ and excessive flow velocity for a small improvement

    If the $$ is the same, or less, then 3/4 makes the most sense

    Since the load at this point is a WAG, 3/4 give you more performance potential

    Few if any radiant pros are unable to handle a 9” 3/4 pex/ slab install install. It is easiest in warm weather😎

    Insulate under the new pour for faster recovery and lower operating cost

    Bob "hot rod" Rohr
    trainer for Caleffi NA
    Living the hydronic dream
  • GroundUp
    GroundUp Member Posts: 2,386

    You're comparing apples to oranges, Bob. 6" spacing WILL allow more BTU output per SQ FT than 9" spacing. Period. Tubing diameter is irrelevant for the sake of this discussion. On that note, I'm not sure which Bluefin tubing you're looking at, but 1200LF of 1/2" at Supplyhouse is $280 not $360. 6 loops of 1/2" would be considerably less labor than 3 loops of 3/4". I will wholeheartedly agree that 1/2" is not the answer for every application and have mentioned that several times now, but having done this very task many times in one of the coldest areas of North America on top of personally owning a car wash which this post is specifically geared toward, I will say one more time that 1/2" at 6" spacing is the most feasible option here. It's cheaper, easier, and will outperform 3/4" at 9" spacing all the way around. The bays (2) in my personal self-serve wash are 14x42 and utilize 5 loops of 1/2" at 6" OC, 250ft each, with a 4ft heated entry/exit pad. Mine is automated (as most are, at least in my area) to shut down when outdoor temp falls below 0*, and the pump will not start until the door is closed when it's below 32*. We've had a few automation failures over the years where the doors don't close, or those fun days when it goes from 40* to 0* in 2 hours during a blizzard, and not once in 6 winters now has there been any ice accumulation. I run this on a basic Tekmar 519 stat with the floor sensor set to 50*, with an 80k Lochinvar Noble (so roughly 60 BTU/SF max capacity) set to 90* using P/S piping, and very seldom does it see high fire.