s2000 v. buderus

Norm Harvey · November 2008

Sorry, I just responded to the other thread and saw this one.

I hate to sound like a broken record but I would go for the low mass system 2000 hands down.

<A HREF="http://www.heatinghelp.com/getListed.cfm?id=569&Step=30">To Learn More About This Professional, Click Here to Visit Their Ad in "Find A Professional"</A>

C Packard · November 2008

System 2000 compared to Buderus

A similar question to that below. Need to replace my oil fired Burnham boiler with new one and am comparing System 2000 to Buderus G115-4. House was built in 1990 and is approximately 3600 sq. ft (long- 84 ft) with copper baseboard heating. Will also need hot water tank and dealer sells SuperStor 45 gal v. Buderus 40 gal. Will be in house 5-8 yrs and looking for efficiency and low maintenance costs. Price of 2 systems is similar, Buderus perhaps $400 less. Any advice?

thanks

C Packard · November 2008

Harvey, saw your answers below and just wanted confirmation. Thanks.

Any thought on the hot water systems?

Robert O'Brien · November 2008

Is

that an SSU-45 with the Buderus or EK?Or both?

To Learn More About This Professional, Click Here to Visit Their Ad in "Find A Professional"

C Packard · November 2008

SSU 45 is w S2k. Buderus has its own hot water tank.

thanks Robert

Robert O'Brien · November 2008

I'd

go with the EK flate plate system over an indirect. The purge cycle won't be as effective with an indirect.You can get a stainless tank with EK if you want

To Learn More About This Professional, Click Here to Visit Their Ad in "Find A Professional"

s2000 v. buderus

Comments

Categories