Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.
Need to contact us? Visit https://heatinghelp.com/contact-us/.
Click here to Find a Contractor in your area.
If our community has helped you, please consider making a contribution to support this website. Thanks!

Need a new Hydronic Oil Fired Boiler

Options

I am going to be replacing a Keystoker KAA-2 automatic coal fired boiler. It works well but I am tired of moving bags of coal around. Coal quality seems to be going down as well. Lots of bone in it lately. I installed it myself the fall of 2009.

The prior boiler was installed in 1969. I assume the oil tank is that old as well. The boiler was all steel with oval vertical fire passages. The hot water coil was mounted vertically in the center of the boiler. It was using 1000 gallons of oil per year for my small home. Switching to coal quickly paid off.

It seems most oil fired boilers are made with cast iron. I don't like cast iron. So I am looking for a steel boiler. The only brand that offers steel boilers seems to be Thermo-Dynamics. Is it a good brand? Are there other boilers that are not cast iron?

I have a quote for Energy Kinetics EK1. I kind of like that boiler. Just don't like that I wont be able to buy parts for it myself. Although getting older and lazier I might not want to service a boiler myself but should.

Comments

  • jesmed1
    jesmed1 Member Posts: 1,300

    What's wrong with cast iron? Some people cook on it. Many people have very reliable boilers made from it. We have two old cast iron boilers, and I plan on getting one or two more to replace them when they bite the dust. They're already 30+ years old and could last for another 10 years. Buderus would be my choice. Well made, easy to clean/service, and oil companies here in the Northeast are very familiar with them.

    PeteA
  • hot_rod
    hot_rod Member Posts: 26,645

    This brand?

    Screenshot 2025-12-29 at 12.51.41 PM.png
    Bob "hot rod" Rohr
    trainer for Caleffi NA
    Living the hydronic dream
  • HydronicMike
    HydronicMike Member Posts: 253

    Cast iron would be better, last longer than steel.
    Energy Kinetics would be the most efficient. All their parts are easily accessible. Depending on model, there are easy work arounds to keep you up and running while you get the parts. Basically, depending on model, it's either the Energy Manager, which can be put into service mode and still work properly, or the aquastat, which can use an off the shelf Hydrostat with a slight wiring change.


    Most important is a properly sized, properly installed, properly commissioned system.

    SuperTechPeteA
  • Expenses1188
    Expenses1188 Member Posts: 7

    I like cast iron cookware. I have a belief that cast iron is brittle, easy to crack. Modern cast iron boilers might be thinner than old cast iron. Also I don't like that there are sections. More places to leak.

    Somehow I missed that New Yorker offered steel boilers. When searching the internet for steel boilers most results were cast iron.

  • jesmed1
    jesmed1 Member Posts: 1,300
    edited December 29

    You might want to read up on Buderus cast iron. It's a proprietary alloy that Buderus claims is more flexible than "traditional" cast iron, and thus resistant to thermal shock, etc. Many pros have high praise for it.

    I am not a pro, just a homeowner/engineer, but you can read what the pros here have to say about Buderus cast iron. If you take some time to research it, you might find that "modern" cast iron is better than you think.

    Ironman
  • Ironman
    Ironman Member Posts: 7,872
    edited December 29

    Whatever make that you go with don’t use one with a tankless coil for domestic. Use a heating boiler with an indirect tank for domestic. That will save you about 30% on fuel vs a tankless coil.

    I’d highly recommend either the Buderus or the Energy Kinetics.

    Bob Boan
    You can choose to do what you want, but you cannot choose the consequences.
    Expenses1188HydronicMike
  • EBEBRATT-Ed
    EBEBRATT-Ed Member Posts: 19,625

    There is nothing wrong with a steel boiler for hot water heat. No sections or rubber gaskets to leak.

    Steel was used in the past and lasted a long time. With the way CI boilers are now I have no doubt that a steel boiler would outlast a Burnham

    hot_rod
  • leonz
    leonz Member Posts: 1,764
    edited 1:18AM

    Hpw often do you brush out the water baffles on your KAA-2?

    I would change coal suppliers and or start burning Buckwheat Anthracite coal instead before you rip out that beautiful coal stoker.

    I have a KAA-4-1 dual fuel unit with the same 3 bed stoker that you have. My supplier has Blashack coal.

    I have my stoker set at 12 threads out and I have fine powder ash and heavy dead ash on some days and I average 20+ pounds of ash a day burning 75 pounds a day of rice coal.

    Switching to a fuel that will give you less energy than Anthracite Rice coal which averages between 25-28 Million BTU per short ton back to kerosene that will give you 135, 000 BTU per gallon is an expensive proposition especially if you need to dispose of the old tank and install the new boiler.

    Selling the kaa-2 on coalpail.com and buying an EFM dual fuel DF520 pot stoker makes more sense as switching to the oil burner only requires moving the oil burner door open to use it.

    I am assuming you have Blashack coal and their strip mining mess and nothing from a supplier that is strip mining the thick mammoth coal vein.

    If we were burning Sub Bituminous Stoker Coal from Montana or Wyoming we would have a fine powder ash that would barely fill a single ash basket every week.

    I would buy 20 bags of Buckwheat Anthracite as the keystoker was designed to burn buckwheat Anthracite and then take the time to make sure there is no fly ash behind the flue baffle and be sure the air duct under the three fire grates has no fly ash or coal fines plugging it up and vacuuming the combustion fan out and oiling the Fasco blower motor before I made a major decision about changing fuels.

  • Expenses1188
    Expenses1188 Member Posts: 7

    I clean the entire inside of the Keystoker once each year. It runs fine and even with the bone in the ash bucket, I can't see whether I am actually using more coal. I have seen posts on coalpail about unburned ash. On a day with no extreme wind and around freezing temperature it will use about 60 lbs of rice coal. Has always been that way. On really cold days, say 10 degrees it will use double that. House was built around 1820. Drafty. For hot water during the summer it will use about 75 lbs a week. Keep the house temperature at 73 degrees.

    I am a member at coalpail. Don't post much. Recently someone wanted to sell a KAA-2, it took a long time. I think it eventually was given away. So I expect mine will be scrapped. Don't think those other boilers will fit my basement. Floor to bottom of floor joists is 54". Chimney entrance is less and the basement is small.

    The Keystoker is the only heat source here. I need something my wife can run. She is 4' 8" and one of her arms does not work well. Luckily nothing has happened that I am not able to keep it running. I am tired of the work involved in using coal.

    Using the Fuel Comparson Calculator at CoalPail I have not been saving much over oil the last 2 years. I think it was the same cost for awhile. But it's difficult knowing the efficiency values to plug in the calculator.

  • SuperTech
    SuperTech Member Posts: 2,640

    I also highly recommend Energy Kinetics boilers. I'm in the process of installing an EK-1F System 2000 in my own house right now. I'm a service technician and I work on all sorts of boilers every day and I believe that Energy Kinetics makes the highest quality boilers. Especially if you want a steel boiler, you won't find anything better than an EK.

    HydronicMike
  • hot_rod
    hot_rod Member Posts: 26,645

    No judgement here :) If you are ready to abandon coal that is up to you. I heated with wood boilers for may years and got weary of the cutting, splitting, cleaning ritual.

    Bob "hot rod" Rohr
    trainer for Caleffi NA
    Living the hydronic dream
    Expenses1188
  • leonz
    leonz Member Posts: 1,764
    edited 5:01PM

    If I was still burning K-1 kerosene I would be using 275 gallons a week to heat this place.

    Anthracite coal will vary between 13,000-15,000 BTU per pound or 22,000,000 to 25,000,000 BTU per short ton.

    K-1 Kerosene is 135,000 BTU per gallon you would be burning 163 gallons of K-1 kerosene to equal one short ton of anthracite at the 22,000,000 BTU per short ton figure.

    The Leisure line WL-110 is a small dual fuel Anthracite rice coal stoker that is smaller than the KAA-2.

    Using a coal vac eliminates lifting the bags to fill the hopper. Here is a link for the coal vac on youtube. You could just slit the top of the bag and vacuum the rice coal into the barrel above the hopper and when the barrel is full you would shut the vacuum off and let the coal drop into the hopper to fill it.

    As far as Toms kaa-2 went people were waiting to see when or if it was going to be cut up before they offered to take it and the draft inducer that was all that amounted to.

    Here is the coal vac video. www.youtube.com/watch?v=yKptXtqxSjc.