Click here to Find a Contractor in your area.
Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.

If you've found help here, check back in to let us know how everything worked out.
It's a great way to thank those who helped you.
Need to contact us? Visit https://heatinghelp.com/contact-us/.

Monoflow w/ 2 parallel elements connected?

wcs5050wcs5050 Posts: 126Member
Am I correct in saying that unless there is a valve/restriction on emitter #1, no flow will occur through emitter #2 under normal open pipe conditions due to pressure drop at #1.

Comments

  • Jamie HallJamie Hall Posts: 10,644Member
    Not quite. If it is piped more or less as drawn, there will be much less flow through no. 2 than no. 1 -- but there will be some. The flow will split so that the head loss due to flow will be equal in the two paths.
    Jamie



    Building superintendent/caretaker, 7200 sq. ft. historic house museum with dependencies in New England.



    Hoffman Equipped System (all original except boiler), Weil-Mclain 580, 2.75 gph Carlin, Vapourstat 0.5 -- 6.0 ounces per square inch
  • wcs5050wcs5050 Posts: 126Member
    If distance between the two emitters is not equal, do we assume fractional flow in proportion to distance, or still split equally.
  • Steve MinnichSteve Minnich Posts: 2,465Member
    I’d say more equally. The difference would be marginal.
    Steve Minnich
    Tell me I can't, and I'll show you I can.
  • Jamie HallJamie Hall Posts: 10,644Member
    wcs5050 said:

    If distance between the two emitters is not equal, do we assume fractional flow in proportion to distance, or still split equally.

    It depends on head loss, not distance directly. Head loss is a non-linear function of flow velocity, and thus of pipe sizes and type, as well as all the fittings -- including the size of the emitters. To take a ridiculous example, suppose those connecting pipes were 4 inch copper, and the emitters were half inch -- the flows would be within a whisker of being equal. Then suppose the other way around -- emitter number 2 would get much less.

    You can't eyeball it. You have to figure it out.
    Jamie



    Building superintendent/caretaker, 7200 sq. ft. historic house museum with dependencies in New England.



    Hoffman Equipped System (all original except boiler), Weil-Mclain 580, 2.75 gph Carlin, Vapourstat 0.5 -- 6.0 ounces per square inch
  • JUGHNEJUGHNE Posts: 5,778Member
    Are both tees of the diverter design?
  • Solid_Fuel_ManSolid_Fuel_Man Posts: 1,598Member
    If you only have one diverter tee setup and you want two emitters, the best way is reverse return the two emitters.

    But with those short distances it may not be necessary. I'd do it reverse return, then you are guaranteed equal flow.
    Master electrician specialising in boiler and burner controls, multiple fuel systems, radiant system controls, building controls, and universal refrigeration tech.
  • wcs5050wcs5050 Posts: 126Member
    Each tee on main run is monoflow/diversion type, correctly oriented upstream and downstream as required.
  • JUGHNEJUGHNE Posts: 5,778Member
    If there is lack of flow for these, perhaps the simplest thing would be to install a metering valve between the tees.
    Adjust the flow as needed.
  • Keith MKeith M Posts: 73Member
    Just pipe them in reverse return. Simple and quick and...it works.
    Keith Muhlmeister
    Slant/Fin Corporation
Sign In or Register to comment.

Welcome

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!