just saw this

lchmb

http://www.ecoburnersllc.com/#!co-our-product/c11jz

They claim to save 20 to 30% just by changing the burner....I may have to check out their training..

STEVEusaPA

They don't say how..If you do check it out, I'm sure you'll report back.

Jason_13

I fell for that many years ago with Interburner and Blue Ray. I'll wait for field results here.

Steamhead

But when they claimed such savings for flame-retention burners over older designs, the savings were real............

lchmb

Going to check with the boss tomorrow to see if I can do their in house training...never know if someone may want one..:)

Steamhead

Some years ago, I installed a Beckett NX burner on my old Burnham V-14. But before I did, I tuned the existing Sunray FC Bantam burner and printed the results. When I tuned the NX, I printed its results too. For this test, both burners were running the same nozzle capacity at 100 PSI.

The Sunray tuned up nicely, but the NX could reach a higher CO2 level with zero smoke. This also resulted in a lower stack temperature. The difference wasn't huge, but it was noticeable. I probably still have those printouts somewhere.

The flame pattern I see in the videos tells me this might just be an evolution of flame-retention. But I'll take an evolution.

Let us know what you find.