Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.
Need to contact us? Visit https://heatinghelp.com/contact-us/.
Click here to Find a Contractor in your area.
Why doesn't AFUE work?
Options

John Ruhnke
Member Posts: 1,020
I will tell you why AFUE doesn't work. The people at the DOE don't understand how the combustion process works. Why don't they understand? THEY NEVER FIELD TEST. Everything is based on educated guess's and laboratory tests. They think that the lower the stack temperature the more efficient the boiler. AFUE is calculated with stack temperature. The lower the stack temperature the higher the AFUE. It makes sense in theory but it doesn't work that way in the field. You see the people at the DOE failed to add excess air to the equation. Excess air moving fast over the flame will dilute and drop the flue gas temperature. This excess air also rushes up the chimney carrying heat from the flame. This greatly reduces efficiency. AFUE fails to account for excess air. In reality if you slow the gas down in the combustion chamber, you will reduce excess air. More of the heat stays in the combustion chamber and is transferred to the boiler. The stack temperature will then be higher. How can you tell how much excess air is in the combustion chamber? Measure the oxygen content in the flue gas. The lower the oxygen content the more you will save in fuel bills and the higher the stack temperature will be. Does AFUE measure oxygen content? NO. That is why AFUE doesn't work.
John Ruhnke
<A HREF="http://www.heatinghelp.com/getListed.cfm?id=96&Step=30">To Learn More About This Professional, Click Here to Visit Their Ad in "Find A Professional"</A>
John Ruhnke
<A HREF="http://www.heatinghelp.com/getListed.cfm?id=96&Step=30">To Learn More About This Professional, Click Here to Visit Their Ad in "Find A Professional"</A>
I am the walking Deadman
Hydronics Designer
Hydronics is the most comfortable and energy efficient HVAC system.
Hydronics Designer
Hydronics is the most comfortable and energy efficient HVAC system.
0
Comments
-
You know where I stand John
I don't even mention "Assumed ficticious useless efficiency" anymore.
My combustion analyser tells the real story.
Mark H
To Learn More About This Professional, Click Here to Visit Their Ad in "Find A Professional"0 -
Educated guesses with plausible deniability
That is what the AFUE numbers are and that is how the people who come up with them get away with them. You can not duplicate out in the field, the conditions they use in the lab. Atmospheric appliances especially are at the whim of whatever conditions they are put in. Sealed combustion AFUE numbers are a little bit better because you are controlling the air for the combustion process. SO many variables. Heck, you still got guys out there that think oil appliances do not produce CO when it burns. AFUE is merely a point of reference. Not really true, but it gives you something to work with.
Darin0 -
For the past 70 years
We have used the relationship of CO2 (which is defined by the amount of excess air in the combustion process) and stack temps.
Are you suggesting the DOE has found a way to NOT use this known correlation to determine AFUE?
I happen to know they do use that correlation. As do all modern combustion analyzers commonly available.
I think your rant is solid. I think the basis of it however is tragically flawed - at least on the basis you suggest.
To Learn More About This Professional, Click Here to Visit Their Ad in "Find A Professional"0 -
BUT
remember the combustion analyser bases those efficiency numbers upon stoiciometric combustion. We all know that doesn't happen.
Darin0 -
For those of us who don't know...
what Stoichiometric Combustion is:
Stoichiometric combustion and excess of air
Stoichiometric or Theoretical Combustion is the ideal combustion process during which a fuel is burned completely. A complete combustion is a process which burns all the carbon (C) to (CO2), all hydrogen (H) to (H2O) and all sulphur (S) to (SO2). If there are unburned components in the exhaust gas such as C, H2, CO the combustion process is uncompleted.
The combustion process can be expressed as:
[C + H (fuel)] + [O2 + N2 (Air)] -> (Combustion Process) -> [CO2 + H2O + N2 (Heat)]
where
C = Carbon
H = Hydrogen
O = Oxygen
N = Nitrogen
To determine the percent excess air or excess fuel at which a combustion system operates, you have to start with the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio. Also known as the perfect, correct or ideal fuel ratio, stoichiometric is the chemically correct mixing proportion. When burned, it consumes all the fuel and air without any excess of either left over.
Process heating equipment is rarely run that way, however. Even so-called "on-ratio" combustion, used in boilers and high temperature process furnaces, usually incorporates a modest amount of excess air -- about 10 to 20% beyond what is needed to burn the fuel completely.
If insufficient amount of air is supplied to the burner, unburned fuel, soot, smoke, and carbon monoxide exhausts from the boiler. This results in heat transfer surface fouling, pollution, lower combustion efficiency, flame instability and a potential for explosion. To avoid inefficient and unsafe conditions, boilers normally operate at an excess air level. This excess air level also provides protection from insufficient oxygen conditions caused by variations in fuel composition and "operating slops" in the fuel-air control system. Typical optimum values of excess air levels are shown here for various fuels.
To Learn More About This Professional, Click Here to Visit Their Ad in "Find A Professional"0 -
John, will you be providing the principles...
behind your proposed efficiency testing method here on this site?
Most combustion analyzers measure the Oxygen percentage, and then calculate a CO2 percentage from that value. Some also provide an excess air percentage from the Oxygen reading also. As far as I know, Oxygen, CO2, and excess air are all correlated. You can get these from a chart that shows the percentages against each other. The AFUE test measures CO2, so it does account for Oxygen and excess air.
As most people have stated, the AFUE method is far from perfect - but is valid as a fair comparison, particularly for indoor installed boilers. Certainly there are variables in the field that will affect the efficiency, but how are we to provide a single value that takes all of these into consideration?0 -
Although I did not see
it in your Engineeringtoolbax.com quote, it would seem that you can have poor combustion at both ends of the air/fuel ratio. Thus not enough air produces smoke and excess air could do the same? Excess air could cool the flame, disrupt the flame characteristics which would cause pockets of incomplete combustion, or make the flame hit a cool wall of the boiler chamber?. Has anyone plotted temps, air ratios, combustion byproducts and such for non-condensing and condensing boilers? Would it produce bell shaped curves?0 -
Yes, Doug...
Alan posted the relationship curves a few months ago. As Jim Davis pointed out, though, it is very generalized and is missing part of the line beyond the stocio point, where the mixture is too rich (I believe). Various types of burners would each have their own characteristics. Some can produce CO drastically with just a slight adjustment of the air/fuel ratio - richer or leaner.0 -
AFUE flawed...............
Jim,
This excess air thing is a problem. My Fyrite Pro has combustion effiency presented on it. Often when I tune equipment, the oxygen content will go down, excess air will go down but stack temperature will go up because of the reduction in excess air. The efficieny percentage will go down on my anylizer which is based on AFUE. In reality efficiency has gone up. That is where the flaw lies in AFUE.
Ken, you are right about getting the oxygen content from the reading of the CO2. But my rant is still right. They don't treat the flue gas temperature right in the AFUE calculation because of the excess air.
I have not made my Heating Efficiency Formula (HEF)public as of yet. I plan to at some point. I will publish the idea in a Trade JournaL. After that I will be open for discussion on the wall. I am talking with Investors right now. The HEF is part of a project that is patent pending.
John Ruhnke
To Learn More About This Professional, Click Here to Visit Their Ad in "Find A Professional"I am the walking Deadman
Hydronics Designer
Hydronics is the most comfortable and energy efficient HVAC system.0 -
If you are adjusting the air flow...
as you decrease the Oxygen, the excess air will go down (as you stated), but the stack temp should also go down (not up). This should give you a higher steady-state efficiency, according to your analyzer. The AFUE can only be calculated in a laboratory - where the water temperature and fuel input are precisely controlled, and a startup, steady state, and shutdown are conducted. Are you holding 120/140 degree water temps for your field tests? No, that is pretty much impossible to do in the field.
If you are increasing the fuel input to lower the Oxygen (and not adjusting the air flow), the excess air will still go down, but the stack temperature may rise, so the efficiency could go down, in some cases. But now you are comparing results at different input rates, other than where the boiler is certified for.
Hope this helps, obviously this is interesting stuff to discuss.0 -
For all its flaws
AFUE gives us a way to compare one boiler to another since both are tested the same way, just like the equally flawed EPA gas mileage figures.
And we should not lose sight of the fact that the best boiler in the world will not perform efficiently if the installation is bad, or the heat-distribution system needs work. That's where we Wallies can really shine!
John, I'll be interested to see your testing method and how much more accurate it might be.
To Learn More About This Professional, Click Here to Visit Their Ad in "Find A Professional"All Steamed Up, Inc.
Towson, MD, USA
Steam, Vapor & Hot-Water Heating Specialists
Oil & Gas Burner Service
Consulting0 -
Testing method..............
My test method takes into account all of the hard work you wallies do!
John Ruhnke
To Learn More About This Professional, Click Here to Visit Their Ad in "Find A Professional"I am the walking Deadman
Hydronics Designer
Hydronics is the most comfortable and energy efficient HVAC system.0 -
AFUE
Didn't expect to see this topic start so early in the season. What does AFUE assume?
1.BTU of fuel
2.BTU's created
3.100% mechanical input
4.100% load
5.100% stable environment
6.Proper airflow or
7.Proper GPM
Old gas appliances can be adjusted with less fuel to make combustion analyzers read 80%. Oil equipment can reduce nozzle size to create higher analyzer calculations over 85%.
But when you measure the BTUs that are transferred to the air or water there is a large discrepancy. If you are using 100 cu ft of natural gas it is assummed that you are producing 100,000 BTU. When you measure the temperature rise of the air and measure the CFM, the total BTU being delivered may only be 50,000 BTU. The analyzer will say 75% efficient. AFUE is base on the 75% not the 50%. The next furnace you test is delivering 74,000 BTU but the analyzer say 73% efficient and the AFUE would be lower. Not much for comparing apples to apples.
Here are some compatitive combustion analyzer readings:
Oxygen-6% Flue T - 430 degrees Efficiency - 78%
Oxygen-8% Flue T - 370 degrees Efficiency - 78%
Owygen-10% Flue T - 310 degrees Efficiency - 78%
These readings are attainable on the same piece of equipment but only the first one will deliver close to its rating. If any of you have read Air Conditioning News or Contracting Business there is an article in both July issues on HSER-HEATING SYSTEM EFFICIENCY RATING-This is for total usable BTUs being delivered for a furnace. It would be simple for a boiler. You can't tune a car engine for 28 miles to the gallon, you can only tune it for its maximum mechanical ability. Oxygen and Temperature are a means of getting there but their values alone cannot be used for efficiency caluculations and every manufacturer of analyzers know this or they should.0 -
True, but...
in the field you don't have the instrumentation required for finding the thermal efficiency via the energy delivered to the system. By the way, in the lab we have a calorimeter which measures the BTU content of the gas. I've seen 960 to 1060 BTU/cubic foot as the range. I would assume that the CO2 can be correlated to the percentage of fuel that is burned (BTUs created).The AFUE calculation assumes the boiler to be about 40 % oversized, for whatever that information is worth. We do thermal efficiency tests (water is weighed) on certain size boilers - the result is usually around 5 % lower than the steady-state test (that uses CO2 and flue temp).0 -
Actually Jim, the tool that you need every time is a pocket themometer. Measuring or calculating air flow and GPM is a little more complicated but setting them correctly only takes a flue thermometer.
CO2 are again theorectical numbers and vary if the fuel is 960 or 1060. The problem is that you can fire 50,000 BTU into a 100,000 BTU heat exchanger and have 100% combustion efficiency but only 40% tranfer or 20,000 BTU. The combustion analyzer sees a low flue temperature and assumes 80% transfer. Again as we talk somewhat last year the whole story is longer than a few posts. I spend one whole day teaching these concepts and how to incorporate them on all different types of equipment and fuels. I am trying to explain here the best I can, because I want people to understand.0 -
Missed this one, but a thought provoker. Is equipment rated for input or output. When we size equipment is it sized for how many cubic feet of gas we can put into it or how many BTU's we can get out of it. In other words it would be like saying we put 36 miles per gallon into a car but only get 28 miles per gallon out, or I don't care how much the horse weighs, I want to know how much he can pull.0 -
Looks like this discussion is heading...
back toward something we covered about a half year ago - without much resolution. If only John would divulge his method! Now our appetites are stimulated, but the main course is denied. It's so cruel! But soon it will be 4:30 and I will be shifting my focus to a plate of scallops, a tall cool one, and the latest in bikini fashion!!!!!!!!!0 -
I am interested in
your "invented better standards" are you at liberty to reveal it?
By the way "rejection" is the name of the game keep your cool and be patient but persistent. I have had my ideas rejected so many times I almost have a complex.
I have some questions, not sure that you and Jim will answer it here but here goes. You talked about saving your parents 28% on there fuel bill could you discuss how that was accomplished?
How are you quote "tuning gas design boilers" to manufacturers specs to get more efficiency? Where are you getting engineering specs from do you have access to their engineering tests? Perhaps you are talking about installtion manuals ????
It has been my experience over the years that efficiency of equipment once it is installed and running can change from day to day. The gas today may have a BTU content of 950 BTU's per cubic foot, tomorrow it may be 1050 BTU's so it is tough to get an exact fix. System design, equipment choice, location, all these things plus the type of construction for the dwelling. Just a lot of variables that can not always be easily discussed or defined in this venue. The setting up of equipment for proper combustion related to % efficiency has never been comfortable to me. You could have an 80% efficient combustion test and at the end of the heating season your cubic foot usage versus degree day and other factors shows that the 80% figure was incorrect to say the least. There are two many things you can do that cheat the figures.
I would love to sit down with all of you that have attended Jim's class and discuss this sometime. I have tried to get Jim to come do a seminar series at my center but I guess they are very busy. Maybe someday, I promise to sit and listen and not interrupt. I would love to compare notes as I have some of my own concepts that I have used for years to determine efficiency. It just maybe we are all on the same wave length.0 -
Combustion
This is pretty heady stuff, but very interesting. Jim S., the less oxygen causes incomplete combustion and lowers stack temp, I wonder if one of the reasons is because of the amount of btu's left in the fuel that were not burned off due to incomplete combustion thus, the intensity of the heat is less? That would be less btu's were released in the combustion process. What do you and Jim Davis think? The caliber of people writing in is astounding. Some pretty sharp people follow The Wall.0 -
How I saved 28% and more...........
Tim,
Alot of questions, I will handle them one at a time and in order.
1) I have not made the choice to make my project public as of yet. It is patent pending, but still continuation in parts or more related future patents might take place. A public discloser could mess things up a bit. Privetly, I might consider a couple of experts to review what I have. I could maybe use some advise.
2) How I saved my parents 28%. Well it started out with a heatloss, I changed the boiler and installed a smaller one, A Buderus. The smaller boiler accounted for some of the efficiency savings, combustion tuning, Tekmar Outdoor reset controls, a low water temperaturer radiant system. I also lowered the water temperature on the baseboard side. I added heat to the basement, which worsened the efficiency a little but increased the comfort. Control wiring. I do a CAD mechanical and electrical drawing first, then spend a few days to review and make changes to the drawings. This improves the quality of the installation. All of these little things add up. Its not just one thing it is all of them together.
I then did a heating degree analysis for the year before and a year after. The system has not been in for a full year yet. So the yearly comparison hasd not been done. But Jan and Feb of 03 compared to Jan and Feb of 04 has a savings of 28%. Because of the outdoor reset controls I am sure the yearly comparison will turn out even better.
3) I have a mathimatical formula that I use for combustion analysis. I received it from a friend of mine. His formula has nothing to do with my formula. They are very different from each other. This friend has been tuning commercial boilers for a very long time. He got paid based on how much he saved a client in fuel bills. He told me not to spread the formula around. It is based on stack temperature and oxygen content in flue gas. I also have learned a lot from Jim Davis's class. I do plan to take one or more of your class's in the future. I want to learn a lot more about gas fired heating equipment.
JR
To Learn More About This Professional, Click Here to Visit Their Ad in "Find A Professional"I am the walking Deadman
Hydronics Designer
Hydronics is the most comfortable and energy efficient HVAC system.0 -
\"The perfect flame\"
We can't make one. Perfect flame that is.
Stoichiometric combustion, or, "the perfect flame" is not possible where we live. That being Earth.
I pose these questions. How do you verify the "efficiency" of the equipment you install? Do you test for "combustion efficiency", or "thermal efficiency"? What does AFUE have to do with either? How do we tell a customer that their new "90+ AFUE system" will save them money if we don't know what the "old, inefficient" system is doing? What if the new system uses more electricity than their curent system? I worked for a HUGE HVAC company that had MANY complaints for that reason. Gas bill dropped, but the electricity bill jumped. Calculate that efficiency.
What we have is just that, what we have. So the Vitodens has an identicle AFUE as Q-90. (Don't jump on me if they are off by 2 or 3 points please) as a consumer, which would you buy?
A Weil-Mclain CG is exactly the same as a Peerless MI, or Burnham Series 2? No difference? Sorry, I'm not falling for that one.
I do not see how a standardized rating system could ever be fair. Can't happen.
If you want to use it as a "jumping off point", fine, but don't tell a customer that they can expect to see a 15% drop in their fuel bills if they buy the 90+ system.
Mark H
To Learn More About This Professional, Click Here to Visit Their Ad in "Find A Professional"0 -
28% savings
Sounds like you did exactly what a good heating contractor would do!
Size the boiler right to maximize operating efficiency of the boiler.
Cut heat losses of the home by using outdoor reset to limit stack effect infiltration losses, along with a dose of radiant to also help, and improve heat transfer efficiency of the boiler heat exchanger by lowering heat exchanger temp.
Tuning in the control design and boiler to operate the equipment most efficiently (long firing cycles at minimum heat exhanger temps with as complete combustion as is safely possible).
I also typically add some sort of direct outdoor combustion air intake to the boiler room, if not "sealed combustion" so you cut losses here too and try to seal up the boiler room. However, I suspect you may increase infiltration for living spaces this way because you have now removed a conteracting low pressure point in the basement (typically)that helped balance out the one caused by air leakage at the top of the home. (Still wondering on this one)
Boilerpro0 -
John I recently had
the opportunity to design a system from the ground up. Not something that I typicaly do on a daily basis. It was my sons new home. He had certain things he wanted for his heating system so I had to work with what he gave me. Hey I taught him so now I have to live with what I created.
We used a Weil McLain CGi-7, which has a power venter. It is three Hydro air zones, one radiant zone, a modine heater in the garage (not my idea), and the indirect water heater. The radiant uses a Stadler Viega system with indoor outdoor. We have now run this system this past winter with a maximum boiler temp of 150 degrees (F)all winter long. We have proper mixing valve set up with pri/sec piping as recommended by Weil McLain, by the way I wanted to use a Munchkin or an Ultra but my son is apprehensive about new stuff. The DOE on this package is 82.1% AFUE. This boiler has a net I-B-R rating of 144,000 BTU's per hour. This takes into consideration a piping and pickup factor of 1.15. I actually made an allowance due to size of the system that was a little more than 1.15. The DOE heating capacity of this boiler is 166,000 BTU's based on standard DOE tests. The heat loss was done by the engineering department of FW Webb who sold him the boiler. The big user is actually the indirect an WM Gold Plus 80DW. The unit has a power venter and is vented into a masonry chimney with a liner we used an increase to 5" at the outlet of the power venter per Weil McLain instructions. Using some of my own adjustments such as baffling down the power venter air output while monitoring CO, O2 and Stack Temperature my combustion analyzer showed intitally only 72% eff. With further adjustment and measuring actual gas flow with input from the local utility on BTU content we fired the boiler to its maximum capacity. The final result was 86% efficiency with 70 PPM CO air free in the flue. The important thing with this being a cast iron boiler is to not thermally shock the boiler. With our present mixing valve set up and pri/sec piping pumping away we have maintained a return water temp to the boiler of between 138 to 144 degrees. There is no evidence of any condensing problems and in fact this boiler system has an excellent cycle rate at 50% of heating load of about 3 cycles per hour. I would have loved to use a modulating package on this system as it would have been a great set up. But with what I was given to work with it has worked out great. We used a great technicain from Scotland by the name of Chris Stewart to do all the near boiler piping and he did a great job. All the piping in the boiler room is insulated and we use outdoor air for combustion with a single opening to prevent cold air intake when the system is not running. I plan to run some tests on electric power usage on this system as it is zoned using circulators and that must be added into the overall cost to determine real efficiency of a system. I am convinced that our thermal heat transfer (thermal efficiency) is high based on monitored GPM flow and Temperature monitoring a various points in the sytem. Insulating piping is a big factor especially piping to and from the hydro air units. The hydro air units also have to be set up properly which I found the hydronics guys on the job knew nothing about. Insuring proper temp rise across the units and static duct pressures for proper air movement is critical.
The house by the way uses three Guardian air systems to balance the air in the home and works great with First Company air handlers. The Guardian units are about 80% efficient as air exchange units go so there is not a real big loss or gain (AC cooling) in air temp when bringing in fresh air.
I have not had a chance to do a degree day analysis on the system but my son reports his gas bills have been reasonable. They also cook with gas, two outdoor grills and clothes drying. This home also has a seperate gas powered generator with its own gas line and meter due to the need for higher gas pressures. The house is well insualted and has used open design features for good air flow with no walls to contend with. It does have some very high ceilings in spots but proper ducting and air flow control has taken care of that.
I am also convinced as I believe all of us here on the wall can attest to wanting to see better ways to accomplish efficiency. Instruments that need to be developed that give real world analysis and instant information so adjustments are made much simplier. If for no other reason we need to save energy.0 -
Any pictures Tim?
That sounds like an award winning system! Must be nice to take your skills to a real life project that you can continously monitor.
Even though you broke the cardinal rule by not insisting on the radiant in the shop slab
hot rod
To Learn More About This Professional, Click Here to Visit Their Ad in "Find A Professional"0 -
Ken, I think the less Oxygen...
is reducing the flue temperature because the flow of the flue gasses is slowed, allowing the heat exchanger to absorb more of the energy, rather than it being moved too quickly and consequently going out the vent system. This is under the circumstance where the fuel input is not being changed, only the air flow, and you are operating on the "lean" side of stoci. I wouldn't say that the "less oxygen is causing incomplete combustion", at least in the range of air/fuel ratio that is safe to operate under.
Jim Davis seems very caught up in the "BTUs out" of the boiler, but I'm not followng how you guys in the field measure this. The manufacturer provides the BTUH input that the boiler should be setup for. It is eay to measure and adjust for. We did extensive testing to make sure the boiler will operate in the best combination of safety, efficiency, and reliability. You couln't even begin to fathom to extent of these tests. We would encourage the guy in the field to set the boiler input as we specify, then do the combustion tests. Maybe you will find a problem, usually it is a field correctable one. When you make adjustments that do not consider the input rate, particularly on gas-fired equipment, you are only seeing how the boiler operates under that one instance. You do not see what might happen under conditions of gas pressure changes, heating value shifts, vent or combustion air restrictions, wind, blah, blah, blah..... We did all that.0 -
I have been
meaning to take some pictures. I will do that and post them when I get a chance.
Hot Rod by the way we did do the shop slab with the radiant and also the new out building to be used for heavy equipment. The out building (started out to be a 12x20 shed) is still being built and we plan to install the boiler before winter. The shed has now become a 24 X 36 two story work shop and storage for heavy equipment. My son sure has a way of making a project grow and grow and grow. I wonder who he gets that from.
The next project is some beautiful acreage in Maine just over the New Hampshire border. We will be building a cabin come spring of next year. Sounds like a glycol job to me with radiant all over.0 -
I like to control
the amount of flue gas to reduce the size of the package going up the chimney or vent. That will slow the flow velocity and reduce O2 (excess air) and still stay at a safe level, you need to keep an eye on draft. With radiant and possibility of condensation I like to maintain flue gas temp above 300 degrees. I have found the ideal temperature to be around 350 to 450 which is sometimes tough to get but you have to work at it. You really have to go back on some of these jobs a couple of times to get it right.
I measure BTU out by determining GPM flow, gallons of water (converted to lbs) and temperature. I do not have a lot of sophisticated measuring devices, I wish I did but try to estimate as best I can some times. I could use some of that equipment you "lab rats" have. Ideally for every BTU in you get the same BTU out, rare but we can come close. You need to measure temperature at numerous points in the system and also make sure the system is piped correctly. Most problems with poor heat transfer have nothing to do with the boiler but with poor piping and pump set up. We techs have to work with what we are given sometimes and rely on installers to do the job right and then we fine tune it.
A manufacturer usually tests to meet the standards that are set for their package. Some of us in the field will go outside the standard to see how far we can take it without cicumventing safety. Some equipment allows you a great amount of fine tunig. Some equipment is very restricted as to what you can do in the area of fine tuning. Some by the way cannot be tuned and you simply set to specs and hope for the best. Always check O2, Temperature (flue & Stack JIM) and CO. LEAVE THEM SAFE!!!0 -
I like to control
the amount of flue gas to reduce the size of the package going up the chimney or vent. That will slow the flow velocity and reduce O2 (excess air) and still stay at a safe level, you need to keep an eye on draft. With radiant and possibility of condensation I like to maintain flue gas temp above 300 degrees. I have found the ideal temperature to be around 350 to 450 which is sometimes tough to get but you have to work at it. You really have to go back on some of these jobs a couple of times to get it right.
I measure BTU out by determining GPM flow, gallons of water (converted to lbs) and temperature. I do not have a lot of sophisticated measuring devices, I wish I did but try to estimate as best I can some times. I could use some of that equipment you "lab rats" have. Ideally for every BTU in you get the same BTU out, rare but we can come close. You need to measure temperature at numerous points in the system and also make sure the system is piped correctly. Most problems with poor heat transfer have nothing to do with the boiler but with poor piping and pump set up. We techs have to work with what we are given sometimes and rely on installers to do the job right and then we fine tune it.
A manufacturer usually tests to meet the standards that are set for their package. Some of us in the field will go outside the standard to see how far we can take it without cicumventing safety. Some equipment allows you a great amount of fine tunig. Some equipment is very restricted as to what you can do in the area of fine tuning. Some by the way cannot be tuned and you simply set to specs and hope for the best. Always check O2, Temperature (flue & Stack JIM) and CO. LEAVE THEM SAFE!!!0 -
I like to control
the amount of flue gas to reduce the size of the package going up the chimney or vent. That will slow the flow velocity and reduce O2 (excess air) and still stay at a safe level, you need to keep an eye on draft. With radiant and possibility of condensation I like to maintain flue gas temp above 300 degrees. I have found the ideal temperature to be around 350 to 450 which is sometimes tough to get but you have to work at it. You really have to go back on some of these jobs a couple of times to get it right.
I measure BTU out by determining GPM flow, gallons of water (converted to lbs) and temperature. I do not have a lot of sophisticated measuring devices, I wish I did but try to estimate as best I can some times. I could use some of that equipment you "lab rats" have. Ideally for every BTU in you get the same BTU out, rare but we can come close. You need to measure temperature at numerous points in the system and also make sure the system is piped correctly. Most problems with poor heat transfer have nothing to do with the boiler but with poor piping and pump set up. We techs have to work with what we are given sometimes and rely on installers to do the job right and then we fine tune it.
A manufacturer usually tests to meet the standards that are set for their package. Some of us in the field will go outside the standard to see how far we can take it without cicumventing safety. Some equipment allows you a great amount of fine tunig. Some equipment is very restricted as to what you can do in the area of fine tuning. Some by the way cannot be tuned and you simply set to specs and hope for the best. Always check O2, Temperature (flue & Stack JIM) and CO. LEAVE THEM SAFE!!!0 -
I like to control
the amount of flue gas to reduce the size of the package going up the chimney or vent. That will slow the flow velocity and reduce O2 (excess air) and still stay at a safe level, you need to keep an eye on draft. With radiant and possibility of condensation I like to maintain flue gas temp above 300 degrees. I have found the ideal temperature to be around 350 to 450 which is sometimes tough to get but you have to work at it. You really have to go back on some of these jobs a couple of times to get it right.
I measure BTU out by determining GPM flow, gallons of water (converted to lbs) and temperature. I do not have a lot of sophisticated measuring devices, I wish I did but try to estimate as best I can some times. I could use some of that equipment you "lab rats" have. Ideally for every BTU in you get the same BTU out, rare but we can come close. You need to measure temperature at numerous points in the system and also make sure the system is piped correctly. Most problems with poor heat transfer have nothing to do with the boiler but with poor piping and pump set up. We techs have to work with what we are given sometimes and rely on installers to do the job right and then we fine tune it.
A manufacturer usually tests to meet the standards that are set for their package. Some of us in the field will go outside the standard to see how far we can take it without cicumventing safety. Some equipment allows you a great amount of fine tunig. Some equipment is very restricted as to what you can do in the area of fine tuning. Some by the way cannot be tuned and you simply set to specs and hope for the best. Always check O2, Temperature (flue & Stack JIM) and CO. LEAVE THEM SAFE!!!0 -
I like to control
the amount of flue gas to reduce the size of the package going up the chimney or vent. That will slow the flow velocity and reduce O2 (excess air) and still stay at a safe level, you need to keep an eye on draft. With radiant and possibility of condensation I like to maintain flue gas temp above 300 degrees. I have found the ideal temperature to be around 350 to 450 which is sometimes tough to get but you have to work at it. You really have to go back on some of these jobs a couple of times to get it right.
I measure BTU out by determining GPM flow, gallons of water (converted to lbs) and temperature. I do not have a lot of sophisticated measuring devices, I wish I did but try to estimate as best I can some times. I could use some of that equipment you "lab rats" have. Ideally for every BTU in you get the same BTU out, rare but we can come close. You need to measure temperature at numerous points in the system and also make sure the system is piped correctly. Most problems with poor heat transfer have nothing to do with the boiler but with poor piping and pump set up. We techs have to work with what we are given sometimes and rely on installers to do the job right and then we fine tune it.
A manufacturer usually tests to meet the standards that are set for their package. Some of us in the field will go outside the standard to see how far we can take it without cicumventing safety. Some equipment allows you a great amount of fine tunig. Some equipment is very restricted as to what you can do in the area of fine tuning. Some by the way cannot be tuned and you simply set to specs and hope for the best. Always check O2, Temperature (flue & Stack JIM) and CO. LEAVE THEM SAFE!!!0 -
I apologize for the
multiple posts I had a computer glitch this AM and that is the result. Sorry about that. Maybe Dan can delete all but one of them.0 -
Timmie, can you elaborate...
on how you determine the BTUH out of the boiler in the field? What and where are you measuring? What values are you estimating? Please be thorough, I am trying to follow you and Jim Davis on this!
Thanks, Rattus Laboratorium0 -
Jim I will do
that for you when I have some time I am flat out right now.0 -
At your leisure, Timmie...
I know you want to reply with very thorough info, as always!0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 87K THE MAIN WALL
- 3.2K A-C, Heat Pumps & Refrigeration
- 57 Biomass
- 425 Carbon Monoxide Awareness
- 115 Chimneys & Flues
- 2.1K Domestic Hot Water
- 5.7K Gas Heating
- 107 Geothermal
- 160 Indoor-Air Quality
- 3.6K Oil Heating
- 70 Pipe Deterioration
- 983 Plumbing
- 6.3K Radiant Heating
- 389 Solar
- 15.4K Strictly Steam
- 3.4K Thermostats and Controls
- 54 Water Quality
- 44 Industry Classes
- 48 Job Opportunities
- 18 Recall Announcements