Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.
Need to contact us? Visit https://heatinghelp.com/contact-us/.
Click here to Find a Contractor in your area.

Question for the Steam Guys, re: vaporstat

Bob W._3
Bob W._3 Member Posts: 561
We are installing a new Burnham boiler for our simple single pipe steam system. The mains are well vented. Is there a benefit in installing a vaporstat instead of a pressuretrol, and running the system in ounces? Or, is that device only for vapor systems? Thanks.

Comments

  • Steamhead (in transit)
    Steamhead (in transit) Member Posts: 6,688
    Yes there is

    since you've vented the mains, you only need a few ounces to circulate your steam. So why build more pressure then needed? It only wastes fuel.
  • Steam Bunny
    Steam Bunny Member Posts: 76


    Steamhead, I'm confused. I thought you needed a bigger main/steam supply to run in ounces as a vapor system.

    What criteria would force a home into a pressuretrol?
  • Dean_7
    Dean_7 Member Posts: 192
    vaporstat

    Listen to steamhead. I followed his advice two years ago and installed a vaporstat on my one pipe steam system when I restored it. it does save fuel and has long since paid for itself.
  • Steamhead (in transit)
    Steamhead (in transit) Member Posts: 6,688
    Most steam mains

    had extra capacity. They weren't sized to the absolute minimum. So the resistance is low enough that steam will move thru them at a few ounces.

    Besides, if this is the system I think it is, the gentleman has removed some radiation. So the mains are now even bigger than needed.

    That's why I suggest the Vaporstat.
  • wentworth
    wentworth Member Posts: 5


  • wentworth
    wentworth Member Posts: 5


  • wentworth
    wentworth Member Posts: 5


  • wentworth
    wentworth Member Posts: 5


  • wentworth
    wentworth Member Posts: 5


    Hey Steamhead -

    If a one pipe system currently has a presuretrol set to cut out at 1.5 pounds and on really cold days it cuts out and cuts in and cuts out and cuts in until the thermostat is satisfied, wouldn't changing to a vaporstat make that happen even more? i.e. wouldn't it promote short cycling?
  • Short cycling

    I've been wondering about that too! But what exactly IS the "short cycling" that wastes fuel? Can somebody help us out? What is short cycling:

    A) Many BURNER on-off "cycles" during a single thermostat call for heat, where the boiler and piping stay hot, or

    B) Many THERMOSTAST on-off cycles, between which the system cools down and pressure drops.
  • Bob W._3
    Bob W._3 Member Posts: 561


    Good question, Geoff. I vote for B. My oversized boiler comes on for 4 minutes or so. I don't believe it ever goes off on high pressure. We are hoping the replacement boiler will burn a little longer and cycle a little less often.

    Lets see what Steamhead has to say on your question.

    Bob W.
    North Mankato, MN
  • Steamhead (in transit)
    Steamhead (in transit) Member Posts: 6,688
    And the right answer is......

    C- "Both A and B"

    Either situation can be described as short-cycling.

    Try for about 3 cycles per hour. This is a good figure for gravity hot-water too, and converted gravity systems that now have circulators.
  • Gene_2
    Gene_2 Member Posts: 59
    Cycle time

    You mean 3 THERMOSTAT cycles per hour? Because my Pressuretrol usually cycles the burner several times before the thermostat is satisfied.
  • short cycling

    Hi Geoff,

    Have you checked the vent capacity? Steam pressure can build up against the air not vented, cycling the boiler on the pressure control, vaporstat or pressuretrol.

    Best regards, Pat
This discussion has been closed.