Monoflow Tee vs Diverter Tee

Tom Sherman

Hi all, I'm hoping for an explanation on what the difference between these two tees. I'm a little unclear, as some of the diagrams I see look pretty similar. Thanks in advance for your help!

Tom

psb75

I believe Monoflow is a trade name for a type of diverter tee. They both do the same thing.

hot_rod

Yeah, Monoflo, or at least the "ring" is a B&G trademark.

Screenshot 2025-02-25 at 9.27.25 AM.png

Screenshot 2025-02-25 at 9.26.41 AM.png

Tom Sherman

Perfect! Thank you gentlemen! That explains a lot. Appreciate it!

Tom Sherman

OK, two follow up questions. I read on the screenshot that the Monoflo can be installed at either the supply or return riser. Here is a pic of the boiler and one of the Monoflo tee. My questions are:

1. This tee is labeled "Up-Feed" It looks like the screenshot posted didn't differentiate. Are they pretty much the same fitting if used on the supply or return side? (If so, any idea why this one is labeled "Up-Feed?)
2. I am currently reading Dan's book on Primary /Secondary pumping and he mentioned the space between the supply and return pipes shouldn't be too close. Does placing the Monoflo tee at the supply side allow the supply and return to be closer?

I ask question 2, because the supply and return are pretty close and there is no secondary pump involved. (BTW, the boiler was out of service during the inspection and was slated for replacement)

Thank you!

mattmia2

Is there a circualtor or is that a gravity system? The boiler somehow looks older than the system it is connected to. At very least it is the original boiler including the conversion burner.

Monoflo tees have a partition in them (b&g calls it a venturi but how much venturi effect it produces is questionable at best). One port of the run is open to the full diameter of the tee, the other run port is partially partitioned off and divided between the run and the branch so it divides the flow between the main and the branch to the emitter. If the tee is at the supply of the emitter then the partition is at the outlet of the tee on the main. If the tee is at the return from the emitter then the partitioned side of the tee is at the inlet from the main.

The partitioned run of the tee always goes to the section of pipe between the supply and return to the emitter because that section is where the flow is divided between the main and the emitter.

If the divided side is placed toward the section of main between emitters instead of the section across an emitter it will restrict the flow in the entire main.

https://www.xylem.com/siteassets/brand/bell-amp-gossett/resources/manual/s17635d.pdf

I think the full monoflo deign book is on b&g's website somewhere too.

Tom Sherman

Thanks for the response! That's interesting, as what I have here doesn't appear to meet either of the diagrams. So just to clarify, the Monoflo in my photo would have the narrow part facing towards the flow?

For reference, this house was built in 1910. I inspected it in 2018 and am unable to locate my photos from the inspection, which would certainly be helpful. That said, I believe it was a gravity system. Come to think of it, it does appear that the supply piping is newer than the boiler. I imagine it was probably galvanized at time of installation??

mattmia2

The tees should be oriented like this. You could have it on the supply or the return or both but the orientation always has to be like this:

Copper pipe and fittings in the form we know of now has been around since the 1930's. There were other diverter tee systems that predate monoflo that were designed for gravity. In theory monoflo should work with gravity circulation but it is uncommon if it was ever installed that way. I could see that boiler and conversion burner being late 40's or early 50's. The house may not have had central heat until then.

Larry Weingarten

Hi, I don't have dates in mind, but that T has the three holes drilled in it for the purpose of sticking the solder in. Plumbers didn't believe in capillary action back then. The T would have been made early in the time that copper piping was gaining acceptance.

Yours, Larry

EBEBRATT-Ed

@Larry Weingarten

Your right about the holes in the tees. I haven't seen those in a long time. Guess they wanted to make sure the solder was "in there!!!

Never saw the holes in a Monoflo before but have seen it in regular fittings