Low flow mixing valve for domestic hot water--needed benefit?
I'm installing a HPHW heater. Plan is to set the temp to 140F and install a mixing valve to 120F. In your experience, is there a real need for a low flow mixing valve? Deciding between these two:
Comments
-
For application you want the regular . The low range model max is 120* ….
There was an error rendering this rich post.
0 -
-
-
it is not uncommon to run the hpwh to 140 . legionella protection for one, but also with the 120v units recovery is fairly slow, so the 140 buffers that. It also can leverage lower over night electric rates.
Bob "hot rod" Rohr
trainer for Caleffi NA
Living the hydronic dream0 -
The whole point of using a heat pump instead of a resistance electric heater is efficiency. The efficiency is entirely determined by the lift. With air temperature of 70F, at 120F you're lifting 50F, at 140F you're lifting 70F. That's a 40% higher lift, you're going to use 40% more electricity to get the same amount of hot water.
The higher temperature isn't going to give you a better recovery rate. The compressor is going to be limited by how much current it can handle, if it's using 40% more electricity it's going to take 40% longer to produce the same amount of hot water.
A higher temperature does give you a bigger first-hour capacity. If that's what you need you're much better off just getting a bigger tank.
1 -
The same amount of water?? If have put additional btus into the hotter tank.
Mixing the tank down in this example give you additional capacity. Sure efficiency drops.
But the reduced kwh costs off peak needs to factor in also. That could offset some of the efficiency hit.
Bob "hot rod" Rohr
trainer for Caleffi NA
Living the hydronic dream0 -
"The same amount of water?? If have put additional btus into the hotter tank."
I feel like I've had this same conversation a million times with people.
With combustion fuel, a BTU is a BTU, it doesn't matter how you get there.
With a heat pump, a high temperature BTU costs more than a low temperature BTU.
With, say, a gas water heater, if what you want is 100 gallons of water at 120F, it doesn't matter if you first heat 87.5 gallons to 140F and then mix in 12.5 gallons at 50F, or just heat the 100 gallons straight to 120F. Gas consumed is the same either way.
With a heat pump, it makes a big difference. You use 40% more electricity first heating that water to 140F and then mixing it as opposed to just heating it directly to 120F.
It's easy to wave your hands and say "sure efficiency drops," but the whole reason you're spending $2500 on a HPWH instead of $300 on a resistance one is efficiency — and you're giving away 40% off the top.
As a general rule, with a heat pump, if you're mixing, you're doing it wrong.
0 -
Only a real sucker would pay $2500 for a HPWH. In some areas they are almost giving them away. Prospective buyers Google rebates offered in your area. Federal, State, local, and utility programs are available.
If the average homeowner pays 3- $ 500 a year for DHW, we are not talking big money differences for running 140F.
Hard to put a price on Legionella protection, unless you have contacted it. And lived to talk about it. Operating the tank at 120 is putting the welcome mat out for legionella parties :)
Incentive Program from Mass Saves
For the OP, if you can afford to run the tank at 140F, I recommend that.
Bob "hot rod" Rohr
trainer for Caleffi NA
Living the hydronic dream1 -
Thanks Bob! I’ve noted all your links and info.
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 86.3K THE MAIN WALL
- 3.1K A-C, Heat Pumps & Refrigeration
- 53 Biomass
- 422 Carbon Monoxide Awareness
- 90 Chimneys & Flues
- 2K Domestic Hot Water
- 5.4K Gas Heating
- 99 Geothermal
- 156 Indoor-Air Quality
- 3.4K Oil Heating
- 63 Pipe Deterioration
- 916 Plumbing
- 6K Radiant Heating
- 381 Solar
- 14.9K Strictly Steam
- 3.3K Thermostats and Controls
- 53 Water Quality
- 41 Industry Classes
- 47 Job Opportunities
- 17 Recall Announcements