Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.
Need to contact us? Visit https://heatinghelp.com/contact-us/.
Click here to Find a Contractor in your area.

Solar water heater Drain back evacuated tube

SolarMike71
SolarMike71 Member Posts: 1

I have pick up a client that purchase a Evacuated tube collector system, w. 120HE tank, and 12 gallon DB res, this system came with 3x30 tube manifold panels, this system is to be install in Tucson, AZ… not the correct climate I know…but its what I have to work with, I have 13 yrs in solar thermal, mostly sunearth 8040 glycol, some DB but the systems I have installed I haven't had to engineer flow, thermal gain for stag avoidance,.. That's what I need help with,

Add'l specs Hot water for 12 - 2 bed, 2 bath units, my thoughts are that the 120 won't have enough hot water for peak use, thinking about adding a 75 gas, use the solar a preheat, And possible a second 120 for add'l solar storage.

the other ? is collectors in series or parallel? I like series in the winter and parallel in the summer. I'm concerned about overheating in series in the summer…

let me know your thoughts

Mike Tucson, AZ

Comments

  • DCContrarian
    DCContrarian Member Posts: 662

    Around me you can pretty regularly pick up solar hot water collectors on Craigslist for free.

    When you consider the cost and complexity it makes more sense to put electric panels on the roof and use electricity to heat the water.

    I know that's not what the customer wants, but sometimes what the customer wants is not in their best interest.

    DerheatmeistersolseanSolarMike71
  • psb75
    psb75 Member Posts: 899

    What DCContrarian says is generally true. But I have uncountable number of clients with solar thermal installations—mostly flat panel collectors, but some evac tube systems as well. The infrastructure is in place and seemingly robust, but often not maintained. Overheating, bad fluid, no pressure, no circulation, freeze ups are most of the common problems. The principal drawback is that it is a separate plumbing system that is often hard to access and it involves indoor and OUTDOOR plumbing. When they work…they make virtually "free" hot water. Your average, run-of-the-mill plumber has more than enough work maintaining conventional plumbing systems these days. They generally aren't looking for work on unconventional systems, let alone ROOF work.

    Larry WeingartenDerheatmeisterMad Dog_2SolarMike71
  • Teemok
    Teemok Member, Email Confirmation Posts: 671
    edited May 3

    Hi Mike,

    If tossing best logic to the wind and doubling down on thermal is the unalterable will of the investor, so be it. I think if are they willing to fully understand it, monitor it and maintain it themselves, it could be a good thing.

    Is the money worth it for you to be involved? The risk to you is: Can you make a system meet the needs in almost all conditions? Will you be expected to maintain it? Will the customer at some point in the life cycle expense of the system realize that the whole effort was ill advised from the start? If that happens, will they find you at fault for aiding and abetting in creating the creature they invested in? Stating it up front in writing that it's "not wise" and getting it signed before hand doesn't prevent the future unhappy customer syndrome.

    12-2 bath units all linked with a recirculation system?

    High volume daily use makes for a best payback scenario but substantial storage is necessary and that's not cheap in materials or sqft-age. If it's a mission critical hot water system, full backup capacity is a must. Double investment. And the two systems need to play well together to make the solar payback. Then there's parts failures, clouds, hail, dust, roofing and heat dumping.

    Think hard about it, it's going to be primarily a heart thing. Logic is necessary but secondary only to make it function. I don't think any logic will make it a simple, reliable and good investment. It's the free panels trap. It has to make sense if the panels are free right?

    SolarMike71
  • Larry Weingarten
    Larry Weingarten Member Posts: 3,576

    Hi, Just some basic math… Twelve apartments with two people each, or 24 people. At fifteen gallons of hot water per person per day, that's 360 gallons, or three times the storage you have now. One approach would be to install an unpressurized storage tank of 500 gallons or more and put a large coil in the top of the tank as a preheater for your backup storage heater. This likely wouldn't be inexpensive. I agree with @Teemok that unless you can adjust the owner's expectations to line up with reality, this could become a nightmare.

    I like solar thermal and have been doing it for about 46 years, but to function, it MUST be simple and designed for the people who live with it. In this case, I think I'd start by looking at what could be done to make the hot water delivery system more water and energy efficient.

    Yours, Larry

    TeemoksolseanDerheatmeisterSolarMike71
  • Teemok
    Teemok Member, Email Confirmation Posts: 671

    @Larry Weingarten I wonder if 15gal. is enough? I guess it all depends on the clients intention and the end users expectations. While I have lived using 15 gallons or less of hot water a day, asking people to be that frugal here is an affront to their freedom to consume. A big no no even here in crunchy Nor Cal. I agree with the unpressurized storage and high coil HX approach. That could feed a 120 gallon tank with a mixer that's backed up by a cascade of 199K tank-less heaters. Could even low coil the big storage tank so that if the sun goes down or away and the big tank is too cold the tank-less could bring it up to a min. temperature for the next mornings peak load. And this is how I start to build a monster. 😁

    SolarMike71
  • Larry Weingarten
    Larry Weingarten Member Posts: 3,576

    Hi @Teemok , My understanding of the conventional wisdom for household hot water use is 20 gallons for the first person and 15 for all others. Still, measuring hot water usage we've found that it can change by nearly an order of magnitude in different households. That's part of why I try first to reduce the load. People have always liked 1.5 gpm showerheads if they're well designed. They can make up for old, clogged up plumbing. I recently did a job where I was allowed to install 1/4" tubing from a manifold for the distribution. It takes no more than six seconds to get hot water, and the short runs have it in three. There is a lot we can do to make things efficient without sacrificing comfort. Or we can build monsters 👹 I've dealt with my share of those too 😑

    Yours, Larry

    Mad Dog_2TeemokSolarMike71
  • hot_rod
    hot_rod Member Posts: 23,219

    Many different rule of thumbs for estimating DHW water use, 20 for the first, 10 for additional was my suggestion. Use the water demand calculator to get an idea based on todays fixtures and actual datalogging of dozen of buildings.

    A water meter can be had for under 50 bucks, put it on the supply to the water heater if you want a accurate number for your building.

    Bob "hot rod" Rohr
    trainer for Caleffi NA
    Living the hydronic dream
    Larry Weingarten