Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.
Need to contact us? Visit https://heatinghelp.com/contact-us/.
Click here to Find a Contractor in your area.

Balancing a reverse return system with different emitters?

delcrossv
delcrossv Member Posts: 1,321
edited January 25 in Gas Heating
I recall reading that with a reverse return system, it's best/necessary (?) for the emitters to me of the same "type" so as to have similar resistance to flow. Issue is, no one lists "drag per section" for these.

So, if I have, say, a loop with varying sizes of CI rads in the bedrooms(based on room size / heat loss) and put a baseray in the bathroom am I asking for trouble? Or do I have to install some balancing valves on the smaller- less drag emitters and do pressure drop measurements?

Also, does it make sense to reduce main size as I get to the end of the supply line or just go with constant size based on total emitter load for the loop?

Lastly, any recommendations for hydronic system design books-with calculations? :D
Trying to squeeze the best out of a Weil-McLain JB-5 running a 1912 1 pipe system.

Comments

  • Teemok
    Teemok Member, Email Confirmation Posts: 677
    edited January 25
    I reduce pipe size at the ends based on flow needs but mirrored manifolds works fine. If you have the luxury of time balancing can be done with simple valves. Tuning each by measuring the delta T of emitter. Or do the math for GPM and install fixed flow device like Caleffi flowcal. (X) ft of emitter at (Y) SWT = BTU. Find the total capacity of emitter via per ft or section rating. GPM x 500 x DeltaT= BTU. Solve for GPM for each emitter
    delcrossv
  • Big Ed_4
    Big Ed_4 Member Posts: 3,015
    You need to size the radiators to what is needed per room . Balance the system with TRV's if you can. Adding an outdoor reset would balance it further ....

    There was an error rendering this rich post.

  • hot_rod
    hot_rod Member Posts: 23,367
    Ideally the radiator is matched to the room load, if not a balance valve or the wheel type angle valve could be used.
    A TRV would give you temperature control and balance.
    A delta P circ would also help balance if you go with TRVs

    A lot to learn about the various balance valves

    https://www.caleffi.com/sites/default/files/media/external-file/Idronics_8_NA_Hydronic balancing.pdf
    Bob "hot rod" Rohr
    trainer for Caleffi NA
    Living the hydronic dream
    delcrossv
  • Teemok
    Teemok Member, Email Confirmation Posts: 677
    If balancing/tuning using the delta T method, the rooms air should be at temperature. I do a rough tune to make sure all emitters are getting decent flow heating up then I wait for the structure to stabilize at 68-70F then with the boiler system at full operating temperature measure delta T's for each emitter and tune for desired drop. Note: If some emitters are in series the delta T is across both or all of them.
    delcrossv
  • EBEBRATT-Ed
    EBEBRATT-Ed Member Posts: 16,459
    @delcrossv

    Resistance to flow is not the main issue. It is the type of radiation on the zone. Cat iron rad heat slowly and hold heat longer and cool slowly. Finn tube baseboards heats fast and cools fast that is why they should not me mixed on the same zone.
    Teemok
  • Teemok
    Teemok Member, Email Confirmation Posts: 677
    edited January 29
    Agreed. It seemed the mix was already done. It would be balancing more than just delta T's. Different cycles and outputs make it ill advised and yet people balance poor setups the best they can all the time. Thanks for clarifying that it's not that easy.
    Living in north CA, problems with mixed emitters aren't as pronounced as I imagine they would be where it is continuously deeply cold. It's definitely playing on an easier setting here. There's more less than ideal set ups that pass as working good.
  • delcrossv
    delcrossv Member Posts: 1,321
    edited January 29
    @EBEBRATT-Ed CI radiators and baseray. No copper fin tube. Question is the different "drag" between the baseray and the upright rads.

    Good to know about mixing fintube and rads!
    Trying to squeeze the best out of a Weil-McLain JB-5 running a 1912 1 pipe system.