Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.
Need to contact us? Visit https://heatinghelp.com/contact-us/.
Click here to Find a Contractor in your area.

Replacing 1/2 iron with 1/2 copper good idea?

sixplex
sixplex Member Posts: 89
edited August 2023 in THE MAIN WALL
So this rad isn't heating too well.

Up top is 1/2 iron is connected to 1/2 copper below
Copper is about 15% smaller on the inside.


Will replacing 1/2 copper with 3/4 copper give more btua to the rad?

I'm thinking the five 90 degree elbow fittings dont help either, only 2 are needed.


Comments

  • Steamhead
    Steamhead Member Posts: 17,167
    Do the other radiators on that system have the same size pipes?
    All Steamed Up, Inc.
    Towson, MD, USA
    Steam, Vapor & Hot-Water Heating Specialists
    Oil & Gas Burner Service
    Consulting
  • sixplex
    sixplex Member Posts: 89
    Depending on rad size either 1/2 iron or 3/4 iron, this is the only piped with copper. Why?
  • STEVEusaPA
    STEVEusaPA Member Posts: 6,505
    First figure out why 'it isn’t heating too well'.
    Is the pipe clogged? Low on system water? Air bound? Shut off valve issue?

    There was an error rendering this rich post.

  • hot_rod
    hot_rod Member Posts: 22,703
    Any idea how many btus you need?  That is how you want to size the piping
    Bob "hot rod" Rohr
    trainer for Caleffi NA
    Living the hydronic dream
  • sixplex
    sixplex Member Posts: 89
    Cleaned out a bunch of sludge from it
    It's a single pipe system, air vent is on the low side of the rad, changing that, might be air bound a bit

    Currently trying to figure if the repiping with a bigger pipe will have a positive impact, being a monoflow system, a pipe that is 15% smaller than designed, with unnecessary elbows makes a difference, just don't know how much of it.
  • sixplex
    sixplex Member Posts: 89
    edited August 2023
    hot_rod said:

    Any idea how many btus you need?  That is how you want to size the piping


    Someone put that 1/2 copper in, original design was 1/2 steel which is 15% bigger, that's how many btus i need i guess
  • mattmia2
    mattmia2 Member Posts: 10,211
    What kind of expansion tank does the boiler have, is it a compression tank or a diaphragm tank?

    What kind of air elimination do you have at the boiler?

    Given the number of questions you have about this emitter doesn't heat very well i suspect either you don't have a circulator with enough flow on the monoflow loop or your air elimination isn't very good or both.
  • ChrisJ
    ChrisJ Member Posts: 16,097
    sixplex said:
    Any idea how many btus you need?  That is how you want to size the piping
    Someone put that 1/2 copper in, original design was 1/2 steel which is 15% bigger, that's how many btus i need i guess


    I've never heard of copper pipe having a smaller ID than steel / iron pipe?

    1/2" copper pipe is slightly larger than 1/2" ID.  Especially type M.



    Single pipe quasi-vapor system. Typical operating pressure 0.14 - 0.43 oz. EcoSteam ES-20 Advanced Control for Residential Steam boilers. Rectorseal Steamaster water treatment
    Rich_49
  • mattmia2
    mattmia2 Member Posts: 10,211
    Oh, and that baseboard is going to have far more resistance to flow than the original standing cast iron radiator did.
  • EBEBRATT-Ed
    EBEBRATT-Ed Member Posts: 15,989
    edited August 2023
    @sixplex

    You need to find out the btus of the radiation. That is how you size the pipe. Measure the length of the baseboard. 1/2" copper will carry 1.5 gpm which equals 15000 btu. Your baseboard does not likely need that many btus.

    The pipe size and material is probably not the problem and replacing it with 3/4" probably will not help. If it is a 1 pipe Monoflo system, you need two Monoflo tees one on the supply and one on the return and it needs to be piped right.

    Its probably copper because it was an addition to the original system and maybe it was not installed right
  • mattmia2
    mattmia2 Member Posts: 10,211
    The baseboard will also heat and cool much faster than the standing cast iron radiators so while the areas with the original radiators are still heating the areas they are in with their residual heat, this area will have stopped heating so you likely will not be able to balance this area with the rest of the system, especially since it is monflow.
  • sixplex
    sixplex Member Posts: 89
    mattmia2 said:

    The baseboard will also heat and cool much faster than the standing cast iron radiators so while the areas with the original radiators are still heating the areas they are in with their residual heat, this area will have stopped heating so you likely will not be able to balance this area with the rest of the system, especially since it is monflow.

    This radiator is the same all the the others in the system, cast iron baseboard type
  • sixplex
    sixplex Member Posts: 89
    edited August 2023
    ChrisJ said:


    sixplex said:

    hot_rod said:

    Any idea how many btus you need?  That is how you want to size the piping


    Someone put that 1/2 copper in, original design was 1/2 steel which is 15% bigger, that's how many btus i need i guess


    I've never heard of copper pipe having a smaller ID than steel / iron pipe?

    1/2" copper pipe is slightly larger than 1/2" ID.  Especially type M.





    1/2 copper ID 0.569 for M, 0.545 for L.
    1/2 iron schedule 40 (seems to be the most common) ID .622
    So the copper has 12.37% smaller ID than the iron.
    I visually compared at the home depot, seems about right

    1/2 iron seems to be equal to 5/8 copper (id) but 5/8 ID copper isn't a thing in canada, only 3/4
    ChrisJ
  • hot_rod
    hot_rod Member Posts: 22,703
    1/2” copper almost fits inside 1/2” schedule 40 pipe, so it is a smaller OD and ID

    Same with 3/4, that is how urinal nipples work and some tub spouts
    Bob "hot rod" Rohr
    trainer for Caleffi NA
    Living the hydronic dream
    ChrisJ
  • mattmia2
    mattmia2 Member Posts: 10,211
    sixplex said:

    mattmia2 said:

    The baseboard will also heat and cool much faster than the standing cast iron radiators so while the areas with the original radiators are still heating the areas they are in with their residual heat, this area will have stopped heating so you likely will not be able to balance this area with the rest of the system, especially since it is monflow.

    This radiator is the same all the the others in the system, cast iron baseboard type
    Are your posts about the emitters that don't heat about a different system? Or are those the only standing cast iron radiators on the system?
  • sixplex
    sixplex Member Posts: 89
    It's a small apartment building 6 units, all apartments have cast iron baseboard rads, and there are 3 free standing rads in the common hallway, 1 of which doesnt heat at all. The one that doesn't heat is on a different return than the rad in this thread they arent related
  • mattmia2
    mattmia2 Member Posts: 10,211
    So the cast iron radiators are on a separate thermostat from the baseboard?
  • sixplex
    sixplex Member Posts: 89
    They are all cast iron. Baseboard ones are cast iron too. The free standing one that doesn't work is on a separate thermostat from the baseboard cast iron in this thread
  • mattmia2
    mattmia2 Member Posts: 10,211
    They are all cast iron but the ci baseboard has a lot less mass than the standing ci so if they were all run off a t-stat sensing the temp in a room where there was ci baseboard it probably wouldn't run long enough cycles for the standing ci to heat, but they are separate t-stats so that isn't part of your problem.
  • Rich_49
    Rich_49 Member Posts: 2,768
    IF i could interject with a question ? In all the years I've been doing this and my descendants before me , I cannot recall ever seeing either baseboard ( copper or Cast ) or radiators that were sized for anything other than 1 gpm . Temps vary for sure but always 1 gpm . 1/2 copper should be sufficient correct ?
    You didn't get what you didn't pay for and it will never be what you thought it would .
    Langans Plumbing & Heating LLC
    732-751-1560
    Serving most of New Jersey, Eastern Pa .
    Consultation, Design & Installation anywhere
    Rich McGrath 732-581-3833
  • hot_rod
    hot_rod Member Posts: 22,703
    I would  guess 1/2” system's are flowing 1- 1-1/2 gpm. It depends on what the circulator is capable of and the head of the circuit

    most all baseboard outputs charts show 1 and 4 gpm 
    Bob "hot rod" Rohr
    trainer for Caleffi NA
    Living the hydronic dream
  • Rich_49
    Rich_49 Member Posts: 2,768
    hot_rod said:

    I would  guess 1/2” system's are flowing 1- 1-1/2 gpm. It depends on what the circulator is capable of and the head of the circuit

    most all baseboard outputs charts show 1 and 4 gpm 


    With a disclaimer about guaranteeing 4 gpm and if that cannot be guaranteed you must use 1 gpm . Did not Siggy say using the extra power and such to have such a minimal gain in output was never truly worth it , or something to that effect ? Maybe that was just on the Mastering Hydronic Design courses .


    You didn't get what you didn't pay for and it will never be what you thought it would .
    Langans Plumbing & Heating LLC
    732-751-1560
    Serving most of New Jersey, Eastern Pa .
    Consultation, Design & Installation anywhere
    Rich McGrath 732-581-3833
  • hot_rod
    hot_rod Member Posts: 22,703
    Rich_49 said:

    hot_rod said:

    I would  guess 1/2” system's are flowing 1- 1-1/2 gpm. It depends on what the circulator is capable of and the head of the circuit

    most all baseboard outputs charts show 1 and 4 gpm 


    With a disclaimer about guaranteeing 4 gpm and if that cannot be guaranteed you must use 1 gpm . Did not Siggy say using the extra power and such to have such a minimal gain in output was never truly worth it , or something to that effect ? Maybe that was just on the Mastering Hydronic Design courses .


    Use higher flow rates, above 1 gpm all the way to 4 gpm, if for some under-designed reason the 1 gpm is not meeting the load. It's the number they tested and certified to at IBR, once upon a time. I'm not sure who chose it or why?

    With todays ECM 100- 120W would move plenty of flow if you had to run higher gpm for extra output.

    4 gpm, if you need to run that much flow in a 3/4" circuit is still in a comfortable flow velocity.

    I'm not suggesting you design around 4 gpm, the number is shown in most all radiation charts as a guide to what you get and what it cost in additional pump requirement. Certainly flow rates between 1 and 4 could be considered it's not one or the other.
    Bob "hot rod" Rohr
    trainer for Caleffi NA
    Living the hydronic dream
    Rich_49