Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.
Need to contact us? Visit https://heatinghelp.com/contact-us/.
Click here to Find a Contractor in your area.

Indirect Tank - Plastic vs Stainless

Options
jad3675
jad3675 Member Posts: 127
I'm in the middle of researching IDW tanks and all things being equal, is there a reason I should choose a stainless tank vs a thermoplastic tank? Burnham LT tanks are slightly cheaper size for size vs a comparable stainless. I'm on city water (Cincinnati, Ohio) and per the published water quality reports I'm well within the chloride limits for 316L stainless, so the tank getting chewed away on the inside isn't a big concern.

Thanks,
John

Comments

  • Larry Weingarten
    Larry Weingarten Member Posts: 3,306
    Options
    Hi, I'd compare warranties, insulation levels and support available for the different tanks in your area and let that help you make a decision.

    Yours, Larry
  • jad3675
    jad3675 Member Posts: 127
    Options
    Fair points, Larry - local supply house sells Weil-McLain and Burhman. WM makes a SS and Plastic tank, which have comparable specs to the Burnham plastic tanks, though the WM plastic tanks are far more expensive than the SS and the Burnham plastic is the cheapest of all. Burnham can be had with a lifetime warranty if you send a check in. Otherwise the warranties are roughly the same (12 on WM, 10 on Burnham). First hour numbers are about the same for comparable sized tanks.
    I'd be able to go bigger with the cheaper plastic, though.
  • mattmia2
    mattmia2 Member Posts: 9,677
    Options
    Look at your water chemistry and the specs for the tanks too. Neither likes water with a lot of chloride.
  • JohnNY
    JohnNY Member Posts: 3,231
    Options
    I love the idea of stainless steel tanks and a better warranty is my go-to option for proposals to clients for their perceived value. As far as first-hour recovery, those numbers are highly manipulated. I compare surface area of the heat exchanger instead.
    Contact John "JohnNY" Cataneo, NYC Master Plumber, Lic 1784
    Consulting & Troubleshooting
    Heating in NYC or NJ.
    Classes
    bucksnort
  • jad3675
    jad3675 Member Posts: 127
    Options
    John -
    Thanks - that makes sense, and yes I had read how they game those FH ratings. So, as far as SS tanks go, Heat-Flo seems pretty highly regarded. My local supply houses list them and can get them as a special order, but they do not stock the or sell them. Is that a big issue? I mean, it's a metal tank that holds water - not a lot of moving parts to go bad. Either it is holding water or it isn't, right?

    John
  • STEVEusaPA
    STEVEusaPA Member Posts: 6,505
    Options
    I personally am a little concerned about plastic tanks, especially if they claim maximum temp of 180°. Not hard to run up and over that temperature for a number of reasons. Hate to see that void a warranty.

    There was an error rendering this rich post.

  • mattmia2
    mattmia2 Member Posts: 9,677
    Options
    I dug in to this a little more and am curious about why I can't find water chemistry requirements for plastic tanks, or at least the weil mcclain.

    If it is going to a modcon you might think about versions with 2 heat exchangers to get lower rwt under light to moderate draw.
  • hot_rod
    hot_rod Member Posts: 22,158
    Options
    composite indirects are fairly new to the market. The temperature limitations, are they for the tank operating temperature and the SWT to the coils? Many boilers run up to and above 180F on a DHW demand.
    Bob "hot rod" Rohr
    trainer for Caleffi NA
    Living the hydronic dream
    joegood
  • jad3675
    jad3675 Member Posts: 127
    Options
    Yeah, one of my concerns was the water having a bit of plasticky taste/smell at the tap if the temp was too high. It's not like these are some fly-by-night operations making them, though so you'd think they'd be pretty safe in that regard....