Click here to Find a Contractor in your area.
Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.

If you've found help here, check back in to let us know how everything worked out.
It's a great way to thank those who helped you.
Need to contact us? Visit

Existing Return Sizes a Problem?

swellmanswellman Member Posts: 14
edited July 31 in Radiant Heating
I’ve been working (I think) toward zoning with two circulators. I was reading a bit on primary-secondary piping and am a little concerned having seen this image in connection with a ‘do not’

It’s an existing system so the pipes currently for the return look like this (and I’ve tried to label the pipes based on the Zone they would end up being a part of based on the re-piping I have planned for the supply with the two circulators.

Is it true this looks problematic? My boiler has to take a 1 1/4” return line and I can’t do much about the original line sizes running through much of my house. Should I boycott zoning with circulators at this point?

Blah. So new at this. You guys have been so excellent answering daily to help!


  • GroundUpGroundUp Member Posts: 993
    The "don't do this" diagram you have there is not primary secondary. With a high head resistance boiler as shown in the diagram, you should not pipe them that way but in a P/S fashion instead. If you have a low head resistance boiler, piping it that way is just fine. There is absolutely nothing wrong with zoning by circ, it just needs to be done properly is all
Sign In or Register to comment.


It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!