Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.
Need to contact us? Visit https://heatinghelp.com/contact-us/.
Click here to Find a Contractor in your area.

Hydraulic seperator ...how much does pump placement matter?

icy78
icy78 Member Posts: 404
As the title asks.
Is there a problem if pumping into the Seperator on the boiler side? (Other than reduced air removal possibly)
Still pumping away on the loop side.
Still hot on top and cold on the bottom.

And...can the extank be plumbed to the same port as the air vent? Teed off below it.
TIA

Comments

  • hot_rod
    hot_rod Member Posts: 23,037
    Like this?

    If the boiler prefers the circulator pumping into it, high pressure drop style boilers, this works fine.

    I like the expansion on either return "blue" connection at the bottom. It's placed in the cooler fluid. It would work connected on the top connections or into the convince port up top. Try not to pipe it directly off the bottom port, it will get dirt and debris.

    I like the indirect tank piped directly to the boiler like this, no need to go thru separation and possible temperature blending. with the appropriate circ of course.
    Bob "hot rod" Rohr
    trainer for Caleffi NA
    Living the hydronic dream
  • icy78
    icy78 Member Posts: 404
  • hot_rod
    hot_rod Member Posts: 23,037
    yes, but I prefer the expansion tank and fill valve connection on the bottom. Fill valve can tee into the expansion tank connection, a tee above the exp tank nipple, for example.

    Expansion tank with connection up, ideally.
    Bob "hot rod" Rohr
    trainer for Caleffi NA
    Living the hydronic dream
  • icy78
    icy78 Member Posts: 404
    Ok That makes sense. Have the tank (bladder) away from the hottest water and NOT on the drain connection due to dirt?

    And to be clear, its OK to pump into the Hydraulic Seperator ? I didnt see that senario anywhere on your site . We have a site where it's almost a "have-to-plumb-that way"
    CBRob
  • TAG
    TAG Member Posts: 756
    NIce -- how do you determine the pump size -- using those "quicksetter" balancing valves?

    That's a nice simple layout
  • ScottSecor
    ScottSecor Member Posts: 885
    @icy78 we made the mistake of piping the expansion tank and feed-water off the bottom of the hydro-separator the first time we installed one. Needless to say, we don't do it that way anymore.

    As Hot Rod suggested in his diagram works best. I realize this method adds another large diameter tee to the materials list, but in the long run it to outperform the other methods. You'd be surprised at the amount of debris, silt and metal chips that end up in the bottom of the hydro-separator.
    icy78
  • hot_rod
    hot_rod Member Posts: 23,037
    The distribution, secondary circulator is and ECM type delta P.

    Open all actuators, say the design calls for 1/2 pm per loop X 5 loops adjust the quick setter to 2.5 gpm. As zone actuators close the delta P circulator will adjust accordingly.

    You still want to size the circulator close to that 5 GPM , both manifolds flowing, total load, even if it modulates.
    Bob "hot rod" Rohr
    trainer for Caleffi NA
    Living the hydronic dream
    icy78
  • icy78
    icy78 Member Posts: 404
    Thank you for the info everyone. One thing I would still really like to know .... is it okay to pump the hottest water INTO the separator?
    I would think that this would encourage the building Loop pump to pull the hotter water into itself rather than mixed water (at low load conditions) from the separator so would that, or is that a viable concern? Or is it basically a wash?
    Not worth worrying about?
    I will say that all the pics and diagrams show boiler pump, pumping into the boiler, away from the separator and the building loop pump, pumping away from the separator on the hot side . It makes sense.. However I can find nothing that recommends this type of piping other than the quantity of pics LOL.
    @hot_rod ?
  • hot_rod
    hot_rod Member Posts: 23,037
    The temperature going into the separator will be the exact same regardless if you have the circulator on the sep supply (top) or return (bottom). Same for the flow rate.

    The whole concept of a separator is the barrel dimension is large enough that there will be no pump interference or crossing over of flows if both circulators are up top, at the bottom, or one on supply and one on return.

    Circulator mounted at the bottom port pumping towards the boiler will be in a cooler fluid, like I mentioned about the expansion tank. Not a huge deal, but why not?

    The circulator on the bottom pumping towards the boiler is for the boilers benefit, not the sep.
    Bob "hot rod" Rohr
    trainer for Caleffi NA
    Living the hydronic dream
  • icy78
    icy78 Member Posts: 404
    > @hot_rod said:
    > The temperature going into the separator will be the exact same regardless if you have the circulator on the sep supply (top) or return (bottom). Same for the flow rate.
    >
    > The whole concept of a separator is the barrel dimension is large enough that there will be no pump interference or crossing over of flows if both circulators are up top, at the bottom, or one on supply and one on return.
    >
    > Circulator mounted at the bottom port pumping towards the boiler will be in a cooler fluid, like I mentioned about the expansion tank. Not a huge deal, but why not?
    >
    > The circulator on the bottom pumping towards the boiler is for the boilers benefit, not the sep.

    Thankyou Bob.
  • hot_rod
    hot_rod Member Posts: 23,037
    If you want to zone with circulators, it could look like this. Not different size circs. The key is them header pipe needs to be sized large enough to supply all those circs total flow requirement.

    An example of one circ on return, multiple on supply from the sep.
    Bob "hot rod" Rohr
    trainer for Caleffi NA
    Living the hydronic dream
    CBRob