Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.
Need to contact us? Visit https://heatinghelp.com/contact-us/.
Click here to Find a Contractor in your area.
Select an Oil Fired Steam Boiler and Avoid Over-Firing and Under-firing
Migan
Member Posts: 1
Select an Oil Fired Steam Boiler and Avoid Over-Firing and
Under-firing.
Holohan laments that
the boiler manufacturers over the years have reduced the water content of their
boilers in order to get better efficiency ratings. The implication is that the
reduction in water content of steam boilers is a negative for steam system.
Like cycling for instance.
Most 3 section boilers are rated for 280 sq ft of steam with
a .75 gph nozzle , and have a similar AFUE
of 85. The pronounced
variance among the different brands is
in the amount of water each boiler
contains. From about 5 gallons for the
New Yorker and Buderus, and about 10
gallons each for Burnham, Smith, and
Williamson, to a high of 17
gallons for the Peerless,
I conclude that
Holohan is suggesting the best choioce is the steam boiler with the
largest water capacity (given that the other
variables like fuel consumption, steam load, and AFUE are about the same
for each of the boilers.) Or am I
wrong?
Holoran also has a lot to say about the folly of over-firing
and under-firing.
Now, if I skip over the three section boiler and instead
hang with the four section boiler like Smith or Williamson, each with 14
gallons of water , and fire with a 0.75 gph nozzle would I get a steam load and an AFUE rating similar to the three
section boilers? Does under firing get
into the picture here, or am I good to go with a four section boiler.
So what is up with
Peerless? How do they manage to score average ratings with above average water
content? And why would I not get
similarly good results with a larger, four section boiler with 14 gallon water capacity, as I would with a
three section 17 gallon capacity
Peerless. It would seem to me
that the four section boiler has more heat absorbing surface and ought to
produce steam at least as efficiently as a boiler with three sections.
There are a lot of
used oil fired steam boilers available at token prices and I’m looking
to replace my mothers’ coal fired boiler (refitted with an oil burner in the
fifties) with a sensible and long lasting updated replacement. Her coal fired one-pipe steam heating system had no breakdowns for almost a
century. I’m a life long renter and
this is the first time I’m dealing with
house heating so please overlook my immaturity with steam heat..
Under-firing.
Holohan laments that
the boiler manufacturers over the years have reduced the water content of their
boilers in order to get better efficiency ratings. The implication is that the
reduction in water content of steam boilers is a negative for steam system.
Like cycling for instance.
Most 3 section boilers are rated for 280 sq ft of steam with
a .75 gph nozzle , and have a similar AFUE
of 85. The pronounced
variance among the different brands is
in the amount of water each boiler
contains. From about 5 gallons for the
New Yorker and Buderus, and about 10
gallons each for Burnham, Smith, and
Williamson, to a high of 17
gallons for the Peerless,
I conclude that
Holohan is suggesting the best choioce is the steam boiler with the
largest water capacity (given that the other
variables like fuel consumption, steam load, and AFUE are about the same
for each of the boilers.) Or am I
wrong?
Holoran also has a lot to say about the folly of over-firing
and under-firing.
Now, if I skip over the three section boiler and instead
hang with the four section boiler like Smith or Williamson, each with 14
gallons of water , and fire with a 0.75 gph nozzle would I get a steam load and an AFUE rating similar to the three
section boilers? Does under firing get
into the picture here, or am I good to go with a four section boiler.
So what is up with
Peerless? How do they manage to score average ratings with above average water
content? And why would I not get
similarly good results with a larger, four section boiler with 14 gallon water capacity, as I would with a
three section 17 gallon capacity
Peerless. It would seem to me
that the four section boiler has more heat absorbing surface and ought to
produce steam at least as efficiently as a boiler with three sections.
There are a lot of
used oil fired steam boilers available at token prices and I’m looking
to replace my mothers’ coal fired boiler (refitted with an oil burner in the
fifties) with a sensible and long lasting updated replacement. Her coal fired one-pipe steam heating system had no breakdowns for almost a
century. I’m a life long renter and
this is the first time I’m dealing with
house heating so please overlook my immaturity with steam heat..
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 86.3K THE MAIN WALL
- 3.1K A-C, Heat Pumps & Refrigeration
- 53 Biomass
- 422 Carbon Monoxide Awareness
- 90 Chimneys & Flues
- 2K Domestic Hot Water
- 5.4K Gas Heating
- 100 Geothermal
- 156 Indoor-Air Quality
- 3.4K Oil Heating
- 63 Pipe Deterioration
- 917 Plumbing
- 6.1K Radiant Heating
- 381 Solar
- 14.9K Strictly Steam
- 3.3K Thermostats and Controls
- 54 Water Quality
- 41 Industry Classes
- 47 Job Opportunities
- 17 Recall Announcements