Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.
Need to contact us? Visit https://heatinghelp.com/contact-us/.
Click here to Find a Contractor in your area.
If our community has helped you, please consider making a contribution to support this website. Thanks!
MM #42 vs a #67
Tim Schram_2
Member Posts: 17
Just curious,
Is there any reason I couldn't use a #67 LWCO to replace a #42? The 67 has contacts to control feeding a water feeder too. Just curious. There is a boiler feed pump on the system for making up water.
Tim
Is there any reason I couldn't use a #67 LWCO to replace a #42? The 67 has contacts to control feeding a water feeder too. Just curious. There is a boiler feed pump on the system for making up water.
Tim
0
Comments
-
The #67 should not be used for a boiler-feed pump
Pumped-return requires the switches to activate every time the boiler needs water. The #67's switches aren't up to that job. They're fine for the occasional water feed on a gravity-return system, but that's it.All Steamed Up, Inc.
Towson, MD, USA
Steam, Vapor & Hot-Water Heating Specialists
Oil & Gas Burner Service
Consulting0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 87.1K THE MAIN WALL
- 3.2K A-C, Heat Pumps & Refrigeration
- 59 Biomass
- 427 Carbon Monoxide Awareness
- 117 Chimneys & Flues
- 2.1K Domestic Hot Water
- 5.7K Gas Heating
- 111 Geothermal
- 163 Indoor-Air Quality
- 3.7K Oil Heating
- 72 Pipe Deterioration
- 1K Plumbing
- 6.4K Radiant Heating
- 393 Solar
- 15.5K Strictly Steam
- 3.4K Thermostats and Controls
- 55 Water Quality
- 51 Industry Classes
- 49 Job Opportunities
- 18 Recall Announcements