Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.
Need to contact us? Visit https://heatinghelp.com/contact-us/.
Click here to Find a Contractor in your area.
MM #42 vs a #67

Tim Schram_2
Member Posts: 17
Just curious,
Is there any reason I couldn't use a #67 LWCO to replace a #42? The 67 has contacts to control feeding a water feeder too. Just curious. There is a boiler feed pump on the system for making up water.
Tim
Is there any reason I couldn't use a #67 LWCO to replace a #42? The 67 has contacts to control feeding a water feeder too. Just curious. There is a boiler feed pump on the system for making up water.
Tim
0
Comments
-
The #67 should not be used for a boiler-feed pump
Pumped-return requires the switches to activate every time the boiler needs water. The #67's switches aren't up to that job. They're fine for the occasional water feed on a gravity-return system, but that's it.All Steamed Up, Inc.
Towson, MD, USA
Steam, Vapor & Hot-Water Heating Specialists
Oil & Gas Burner Service
Consulting0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 86.9K THE MAIN WALL
- 3.2K A-C, Heat Pumps & Refrigeration
- 57 Biomass
- 425 Carbon Monoxide Awareness
- 109 Chimneys & Flues
- 2.1K Domestic Hot Water
- 5.7K Gas Heating
- 105 Geothermal
- 160 Indoor-Air Quality
- 3.6K Oil Heating
- 70 Pipe Deterioration
- 975 Plumbing
- 6.3K Radiant Heating
- 386 Solar
- 15.4K Strictly Steam
- 3.4K Thermostats and Controls
- 54 Water Quality
- 44 Industry Classes
- 47 Job Opportunities
- 17 Recall Announcements