Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.
Need to contact us? Visit https://heatinghelp.com/contact-us/.
Click here to Find a Contractor in your area.
Cant Decide: A.O. Smith Gas condensing WH vs. Indirect fired w/my notsogreen boiler.
DSM_Storm
Member Posts: 1
Hello folks, this is my first time posting here. Im trying to make a decision based on my budget and my current situation. I just moved into my home 5 months ago. I had my domestic hot water and heating system inspected by a licensed plumer and my current water heater (16yr old natural gas State tank) needs to be replaced ASAP. I started looking into hot water heaters and learned a bit by searching. Im currently debating on an A.O. Smith Vertex 100 gas condensing unit with 96% efficiency or a triangle tube smart-80 Indirect storage tank hooked up to my current boiler.
I opened the front hood on my boiler.. my home is currently being heated by a Burnham P204-W Natural Gas model 70K btu. This model was built in 1983 and from what I gathered on the Burnham site, it carries a roughly 82% efficiency rating.
I cannot afford to swap out my current boiler with a more efficient model so it will need to stay. Should I get the ao smith model which will run me roughly $2600 installed by a friend of mine which is a licensed plumber in the state and is giving me a deal?
Or should I go with an indirect storage tank which will run me roughly the same installed, maybe a bit more?
Most say the way to go is indirect fired, but most of the people posting are using this method with a greener more efficient boiler. The indirect has a lifetime warranty on the tank with minimal cost to swap over to a new boiler down the road. The ao smith will need to be replaced in roughly 6 years or so.
Any help is appriciated. Sorry for any newb postings.
I opened the front hood on my boiler.. my home is currently being heated by a Burnham P204-W Natural Gas model 70K btu. This model was built in 1983 and from what I gathered on the Burnham site, it carries a roughly 82% efficiency rating.
I cannot afford to swap out my current boiler with a more efficient model so it will need to stay. Should I get the ao smith model which will run me roughly $2600 installed by a friend of mine which is a licensed plumber in the state and is giving me a deal?
Or should I go with an indirect storage tank which will run me roughly the same installed, maybe a bit more?
Most say the way to go is indirect fired, but most of the people posting are using this method with a greener more efficient boiler. The indirect has a lifetime warranty on the tank with minimal cost to swap over to a new boiler down the road. The ao smith will need to be replaced in roughly 6 years or so.
Any help is appriciated. Sorry for any newb postings.
0
Comments
-
just put in ao smith 4 months ago
I think your friend is not giving you a deal, install price is a little much for a friend. My customer likes the unit and it will give all the hot water you need. I would suggest setting the water temp high and putting a mixing vale on it to get the required temp.0 -
I'd go with the indirect
it will outlast any direct-fired water heater, and has more heat-transfer surface than any direct-fired unit. When you replace your present boiler the indirect will remain.All Steamed Up, Inc.
Towson, MD, USA
Steam, Vapor & Hot-Water Heating Specialists
Oil & Gas Burner Service
Consulting0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 86.3K THE MAIN WALL
- 3.1K A-C, Heat Pumps & Refrigeration
- 53 Biomass
- 422 Carbon Monoxide Awareness
- 90 Chimneys & Flues
- 2K Domestic Hot Water
- 5.4K Gas Heating
- 100 Geothermal
- 156 Indoor-Air Quality
- 3.4K Oil Heating
- 63 Pipe Deterioration
- 916 Plumbing
- 6K Radiant Heating
- 381 Solar
- 14.9K Strictly Steam
- 3.3K Thermostats and Controls
- 54 Water Quality
- 41 Industry Classes
- 47 Job Opportunities
- 17 Recall Announcements