Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.
Need to contact us? Visit https://heatinghelp.com/contact-us/.
Click here to Find a Contractor in your area.

Boiler life: Probe versys Mechanical LWCO

Is there any evidence that a steam boiler life is extended with a probe type LWCO? It seems that since I need to add around a quart or two of water every week as part of the blow down of my mechanical LWCO, that using the probe type would eliminate the addition of oxygen laden water and extend my boiler life.



Or are we simply adding convenience?



Steve
Steve from Denver, CO

Comments

  • Joe V_2
    Joe V_2 Member Posts: 234
    That is ...

    ...a good and legitimate argument to have a probe instead of mecanical LWCO.

    Carbonic Acid corrodes so there's the evidence.  How long will it take is another question. I just replaced my 85 year old boiler that had a mechanical LWCO.  I didn't see any signs of corrosion or anything close to pin holes. 

    My feeling is, if you do a good job maintaining/inspecting the boiler and don't mind blowing down the LWCO weekly, the boiler will outlast you. 
  • Steamhead
    Steamhead Member Posts: 17,312
    Probes are more reliable

    every cracked steamer I've had to replace had a float-type cutoff. We only install boilers with probes now. 
    All Steamed Up, Inc.
    Towson, MD, USA
    Steam, Vapor & Hot-Water Heating Specialists
    Oil & Gas Burner Service
    Consulting
  • Steve Garson_2
    Steve Garson_2 Member Posts: 712
    Do you have a preferred probe LWCO

    Any preference in manufacturer? For a home boiler 120V
    Steve from Denver, CO
  • jpf321
    jpf321 Member Posts: 1,568
    fyi ... i've heard

    the other night at Dan's Steam School...one of the gentlemen that seemed to know about such things mentioned that both are now required for NYC code .. and 1 of them must be manually reset.



    additionally, i've heard that NYC now requires pigtails of brass not black .. and a separate pigtail for each pressure control device .. and i think that all pressure menorahs/antlers need to be brass rather than black ..



    is there anyone here that's up on NYC code and where to find these updates? i've tried looking for boiler code requirements, but i didn't find these things at www.nyc.gov/dob



    thanks
    1-pipe Homeowner - Queens, NYC

    NEW: SlantFin Intrepid TR-30 + Tankless + Riello 40-F5 @ 0.85gph | OLD: Fitzgibbons 402 boiler + Beckett "SR" Oil Gun @ 1.75gph

    installed: 0-20oz/si gauge | vaporstat | hour-meter | gortons on all rads | 1pc G#2 + 1pc G#1 on each of 2 mains

    Connected EDR load: 371 sf venting load: 2.95cfm vent capacity: 4.62cfm
    my NEW system pics | my OLD system pics
  • BRIANJ
    BRIANJ Member Posts: 118
    Probe type cut offs

    I just removed a Cycle Guard probe type LWCO because it was shutting down the boiler every 20 minutes to check the water level. Interrupted the steam cycle for a full minute. Long enough for steam to condense. Replaced with my old McDonnell Miller that works just fine. I don't mind checking the water level and the blow down helps get rid of any debris from the old returns.

    Are there any probe type LWCO's that don't check the system and shut the boiler down every 20 minutes. Is there a probe that continuously monitors the water level?

    Lastly, I would think the system electric is more likely 24V transformer that 120V.

    Would appreciate any suggestions.
  • hootie26
    hootie26 Member Posts: 1
    LWCO prove vs mechanical

    I've been plumbing since 1992, I've come across both. I prefer mechanical, although I blow mine down monthly. As mentioned earlier, if you maintain your boiler mechanical is better all things considered. With mechanical lwco boiler will not interrupt cycle unless water is truely low, with the probe you can and will get false low water sensing, most due to water boiling and its rapid/violent movement while boiling. Mechanical lwco are not so much affected by boiler operation such as the probe
This discussion has been closed.