Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.
Need to contact us? Visit https://heatinghelp.com/contact-us/.
Click here to Find a Contractor in your area.

Pex AL Pex & no plates for staple up ?

Andrew Hagen_2
Andrew Hagen_2 Member Posts: 236
The aluminum does nothing for the heat transfer. The aluminum helps by greatly reducing the thermal expansion of the pex. Plates are very important to reducing the required fluid temperatures for the system. When it comes to conduction, it's all about contact area.

Comments

  • Rod Kotiga
    Rod Kotiga Member Posts: 68


    Has anyone tried using a Pex Al Pex tubing without plates with any success. We all know the Watts people say they have done case studies and have found that you don't need plates. ( There opinion ) Well if they don't use plates because there Onix has an Al barrier which also helps in the transfer of heat then does that mean if you were so inclined you could use Pex Al Pex with the same results at a third of the cost of Onix. I mean if the areas in question will heat with Onix and no plates then why not Pex Al Pex ?

    Rod
  • This is from,

    the Ipex manual.

    Dave
  • And this,

    was Siggy`s article.
    You be the judge.

    Dave
  • Rod Kotiga
    Rod Kotiga Member Posts: 68


    Andrew your right about the Al in the pex or Onix. It has no performance benefit and Watts said the same. I was just wondering if anyone has had any luck using Pex Al Pex without plates. Iv'e read Siggy's article more than once and plates are the way to go for sure I just have a stuburn Contractor. :(

    Rod
  • Jim Erhardt_3
    Jim Erhardt_3 Member Posts: 80
    A bear...

    Never tried PAP in a staple-up application, but I suspect it would be a real PIA to work with. Pex with extruded plates or Onix would be my primary staple-up choices.
  • as Dan would say it all depends....

    not to be a smart a$$ but it all depends on the performance you want and need. I have designed and supplied jobs with PAP without plates... but why spend the extra bucks when PEX is easier to work with (I sell both).

    If you BTUH demand is high you will need plates to reduce water temp and decrease reactionary time. If your demand is low the no plate rule may apply.

    Of course if you are going for MAX efficiency then use plates.

    See, it all depends!

    skw
  • hot_rod
    hot_rod Member Posts: 23,173
    pex or PAP with UltraFin

    would be another option. Better performance than bare tube staple up, but not a conductive transfer like extruded plates.

    It all depends on the loads (btu/sq.ft.)

    hr
    Bob "hot rod" Rohr
    trainer for Caleffi NA
    Living the hydronic dream
  • well, there's the next 'product'

    attach al strips to the sub floor before it's put down. then staple up
  • EMB
    EMB Member Posts: 37
    PAP staple up

    Okay, I asked once before how one uses PAP in staple up without a bazillion couplings or kinks but no one seemed to have a cost effective solution, or indeed any solution. The minimal expansion has definite merit, but can it be done cost effectively? Just curious.

    Enda
  • lee_7
    lee_7 Member Posts: 457


    We ran close to 1500 feet of Kitec pap with plates, with no couplings, with the exception of the couplings we planned for. Had to put couplings in loops when changing from addition basement to old basement. 2" holes and just keep making loops, then pull down joist bays. it works, takes a little extra time, but it works.
  • Rod Kotiga
    Rod Kotiga Member Posts: 68


    Very carfully is how you do it. It's not as kinky as you think. With two guys it goes preety smooth. Also I was thinking about 3/8" Watts PAP to make things even easier. For some strange reason Wirsbo MLC Pex Al Pex is cheaper than their He-pex ?? I would think it would cost a ton to sandwich in aluminium in there ??

    Rod
  • hot_rod
    hot_rod Member Posts: 23,173
    PAP

    does take some extra care when pulling thru holes and open web trusses. But it is do-able. A good uncoiler, two installers, makes the difference. Yes, it does take some patience and practice.

    Kitec use to have an installation video showing a good method, called sewing, or something like that.

    A better tubing option is the Viega FostaPex. It's a full size pex tube with the aluminum wrapped around the outside. It doesn't kink like PAP and has a very durable outer PE layer. So you get the best of both, a full size pex tube with two extra outer layers and the aluminum.

    It does require a stripper tool to remove the outer covering for the crimp rings.

    hr
    Bob "hot rod" Rohr
    trainer for Caleffi NA
    Living the hydronic dream
  • Rod Kotiga
    Rod Kotiga Member Posts: 68


    Are ther any noise issues with PAP stapled to the sub floor, like expansion ?

    Rod
  • John_162
    John_162 Member Posts: 35
    Viega FostaPex

    hr,
    you can't use crimp with FostaPex. you need to use Viega Press fittings with Press Sleeve's. if you try and use crimp fittings with crimp rings it may leak and Viega won't cover it because its not approved fitting system with the tubing
  • Steve M_2
    Steve M_2 Member Posts: 121
    no noise

    Haven't had any problems with noise with PAP because all the systems I've done have been continuous flow, either via injection pumping or with TRV's. I think PAP is easier than PEX in doing staple up because it keeps its form and doesn't coil up when pulling thru the joists. By all means, use plates. Show your contractor the link that Dave put up eariler.
  • hot_rod
    hot_rod Member Posts: 23,173
    yes, use the factory approved

    fitting and connection.

    I have used off the shelf pex manifolds and crimp rings for test manifolds with FostaPex, removed them after the pour and building construction to installed the finished product with the Viega connection.

    I have a bundle of test manifolds from PHP that I used over and over for the test and pour part of the job. Concrete finishers can be fairly rough on radiant manifolds.

    hr
    Bob "hot rod" Rohr
    trainer for Caleffi NA
    Living the hydronic dream
This discussion has been closed.