Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.
Need to contact us? Visit https://heatinghelp.com/contact-us/.
Click here to Find a Contractor in your area.

Between the Tees

Options
If the flow rates are the same on both sides, say 10 GPM, is there any flow between the CSTs? Or, is it stagnant, for lack of a better term. I alway thought both flows passed each between the CSTs, but does the flow instead go directly from primary to secondary in that case??

One other stoopid question: why do I see it stated that the diameter of the piping between the CSTs should be larger that used on either loop if The max. flow in the between the CSTs will never be greater than the difference of the GPM flowing in both loops?

What goes in must come out, but it has two ports to choose from :) It starting to clear up in my mind a bit..

Comments

  • radiconnection
    radiconnection Member Posts: 29
    Options
    Understanding flow between P/S CSTs

    is the flow between closely spaced Tees the sum of both flows, and do both flows occur simultaneously in the space between the tees, or just the difference? I'm getting confused.
  • S Ebels_2
    S Ebels_2 Member Posts: 74
    Options
    What goes in must come out

    The confusing part of P/S is that you have 2 in's and 2 out's. One set on the primary and the other on the secondary side.

    Let's say we have a primary flow of 20
    GPM entering the P/S tee arrangement.

    10 GPM leaves that flow and goes out to the secondary loop

    The flow is now only 10 GPM in the primary between the CST's

    At the point where the secondary dumps back in to the primary, the flow rate is back up to 20 GPM.

    Now assume that the primary flow is 10 GPM

    20GPM leaves the primary and heads out to parts unknown on the secondary. Where did the additional 10GPM come from?

    It got stolen from the 20 GPM return flow on the secondary, actually reversing the direction of the primary loop inbetween the two CST's.

    Meanwhile, 10GPM of the secondary return heads back down the primary wondering the the H*** just happened
  • Mark Eatherton
    Mark Eatherton Member Posts: 5,853
    Options
    Simple math...

    In your last scenario, the flow betwixt the tees would be ZERO.

    Where did you see that the common piping had to be larger?

    I've never seen that.

    ME
    It's not so much a case of "You got what you paid for", as it is a matter of "You DIDN'T get what you DIDN'T pay for, and you're NOT going to get what you thought you were in the way of comfort". Borrowed from Heatboy.
  • radiconnection
    radiconnection Member Posts: 29
    Options


    Anedoctal information, and I can't from whom or where I heard it from at this point! But, all of this pretty much clears up the misconceptions, I can see how the flows work now.

    Pete
  • s.brown
    s.brown Member Posts: 8
    Options
    pipe diameters

    Any drawing schematic that I have been given always mentions on a p/s system is to not exceed a max. 4 pipe diameters between the TEES
  • radiconnection
    radiconnection Member Posts: 29
    Options


    Shane, that would be the cross sectional pipe diameter between the CSTs, as in going to 1-1/2" diameter pipe between the CSTs, when the supply and return pipes to the outside tees are 1-1/4". That's what I was trying to say...

    Pete
  • NRTDave
    NRTDave Member Posts: 48
    Options
    Better hydrinic separation...

    Using larger diameter piping in the area of the closely spaced tees should result in less velocity there and therefore less chance of the flow from one circuit affecting the other.
  • Steve Ebels_3
    Steve Ebels_3 Member Posts: 1,291
    Options
    Uni

    That would be true but it's the pressure drop or rather the lack of it that makes P/S piping work. That being said, I usually make a practice of doing what you described using a WebStone P/S tee one size larger than the pipe or tube.
This discussion has been closed.