Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.
Need to contact us? Visit https://heatinghelp.com/contact-us/.
Click here to Find a Contractor in your area.
aquabooster efficiency
Robert O'Brien
Member Posts: 3,562
the standby loss is too great
<A HREF="http://www.heatinghelp.com/getListed.cfm?id=313&Step=30">To Learn More About This Professional, Click Here to Visit Their Ad in "Find A Professional"</A>
<A HREF="http://www.heatinghelp.com/getListed.cfm?id=313&Step=30">To Learn More About This Professional, Click Here to Visit Their Ad in "Find A Professional"</A>
To learn more about this professional, click here to visit their ad in Find A Contractor.
0
Comments
-
aqua booster efficiency
Would an aqua booster working off a tankless coil (scale free) in a well maintained boiler provide the same efficiency for DHW as would a new indirect running as it's own zone. The stand by heat loss of the aqua booster tank could be considered similar to a good quality indirect. The circulation piping from the tankless coil is 3/4". The boiler stays on year round to provide DHW and to minimize leaks and sludge. Thanks for any thoughts. Mark S.0 -
they
had their day...in the '70's. Indirect trumps big time.
With the booster, you still have to maintain temp on the boiler 24/7/365, and the booster is only as good as the coil's condition.
I personally would not even entertain the thought of one.0 -
I
agree,At almost $5/gallon they have outlived their usefulness
To Learn More About This Professional, Click Here to Visit Their Ad in "Find A Professional"To learn more about this professional, click here to visit their ad in Find A Contractor.0 -
Actually
We've installed a few boiler / aquabooster combos and set up the boiler as " warm start " ( the lowest setting on an 8124 aquastat ). We wired the aquabooster circulator for priority in a multizone relay . Haven't heard of an issue with them so far . But I'd guess recovery would take longer than a good quality indirect . How much longer is the big question ............ My educated guess ? Not much longer .0 -
Stanby loss
Are you saying the standby loss for an aquabooster is considerable , compared to an indirect ? I don't think I agree .0 -
boiler
standby loss goes up when the boiler maintains any temp.
probably reasonable to expect more standby loss on a booster w/ the typical 1/2" of batt insulation, with the typical tankless boiler keeping it 150 or more vs. the 2"+ foam insulation usually found in a good indirect @140.0 -
Yes
Standby loss does go up if the boiler will maintain a high temp .
But my point is you can cold start a boiler even if you use a coil and aquabooster .
We use Bradford White electric heaters for aquaboosters . They have a nice thickness of foam insulation - more insulation than some bargain basement indirects with fiberglass batting . I'm thinking the stanby issue might be a wash unless you use a top o' the line indirect .0 -
do
you guys leave the elements in/all stock so the thing can be used as sole electric if the HO ever wanted to wire it as a back up Ron? I like that idea.0 -
Yep
If there's 2 elements , we use the lower surface mount aquastat to control the tank temp . Wiring the upper element for a backup would be pretty easy .0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 86.2K THE MAIN WALL
- 3.1K A-C, Heat Pumps & Refrigeration
- 52 Biomass
- 422 Carbon Monoxide Awareness
- 90 Chimneys & Flues
- 2K Domestic Hot Water
- 5.4K Gas Heating
- 99 Geothermal
- 156 Indoor-Air Quality
- 3.4K Oil Heating
- 63 Pipe Deterioration
- 913 Plumbing
- 6K Radiant Heating
- 381 Solar
- 14.8K Strictly Steam
- 3.3K Thermostats and Controls
- 53 Water Quality
- 41 Industry Classes
- 47 Job Opportunities
- 17 Recall Announcements