Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.
Need to contact us? Visit https://heatinghelp.com/contact-us/.
Click here to Find a Contractor in your area.

aquabooster efficiency

Robert O'Brien
Robert O'Brien Member Posts: 3,562
the standby loss is too great

<A HREF="http://www.heatinghelp.com/getListed.cfm?id=313&Step=30">To Learn More About This Professional, Click Here to Visit Their Ad in "Find A Professional"</A>
To learn more about this professional, click here to visit their ad in Find A Contractor.

Comments

  • mark schofield
    mark schofield Member Posts: 153
    aqua booster efficiency

    Would an aqua booster working off a tankless coil (scale free) in a well maintained boiler provide the same efficiency for DHW as would a new indirect running as it's own zone. The stand by heat loss of the aqua booster tank could be considered similar to a good quality indirect. The circulation piping from the tankless coil is 3/4". The boiler stays on year round to provide DHW and to minimize leaks and sludge. Thanks for any thoughts. Mark S.
  • Bob Bona_4
    Bob Bona_4 Member Posts: 2,083
    they

    had their day...in the '70's. Indirect trumps big time.

    With the booster, you still have to maintain temp on the boiler 24/7/365, and the booster is only as good as the coil's condition.

    I personally would not even entertain the thought of one.
  • Robert O'Brien
    Robert O'Brien Member Posts: 3,562
    I

    agree,At almost $5/gallon they have outlived their usefulness

    To Learn More About This Professional, Click Here to Visit Their Ad in "Find A Professional"
    To learn more about this professional, click here to visit their ad in Find A Contractor.
  • bill_97
    bill_97 Member Posts: 172
    Actually

    We've installed a few boiler / aquabooster combos and set up the boiler as " warm start " ( the lowest setting on an 8124 aquastat ). We wired the aquabooster circulator for priority in a multizone relay . Haven't heard of an issue with them so far . But I'd guess recovery would take longer than a good quality indirect . How much longer is the big question ............ My educated guess ? Not much longer .
  • bill_97
    bill_97 Member Posts: 172
    Stanby loss

    Are you saying the standby loss for an aquabooster is considerable , compared to an indirect ? I don't think I agree .
  • Bob Bona_4
    Bob Bona_4 Member Posts: 2,083
    boiler

    standby loss goes up when the boiler maintains any temp.

    probably reasonable to expect more standby loss on a booster w/ the typical 1/2" of batt insulation, with the typical tankless boiler keeping it 150 or more vs. the 2"+ foam insulation usually found in a good indirect @140.
  • bill_97
    bill_97 Member Posts: 172
    Yes

    Standby loss does go up if the boiler will maintain a high temp .

    But my point is you can cold start a boiler even if you use a coil and aquabooster .

    We use Bradford White electric heaters for aquaboosters . They have a nice thickness of foam insulation - more insulation than some bargain basement indirects with fiberglass batting . I'm thinking the stanby issue might be a wash unless you use a top o' the line indirect .
  • Bob Bona_4
    Bob Bona_4 Member Posts: 2,083
    do

    you guys leave the elements in/all stock so the thing can be used as sole electric if the HO ever wanted to wire it as a back up Ron? I like that idea.
  • bill_97
    bill_97 Member Posts: 172
    Yep

    If there's 2 elements , we use the lower surface mount aquastat to control the tank temp . Wiring the upper element for a backup would be pretty easy .
This discussion has been closed.