Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.
Need to contact us? Visit https://heatinghelp.com/contact-us/.
Click here to Find a Contractor in your area.
TT Solo 60
Ross_7
Member Posts: 577
, why the Solo 60's are taking so long to get to distributors? Also, is their website down?
Ross
Ross
0
Comments
-
Anybody get a Solo 60 yet?,,, I`m still waiting on 3.
Dave0 -
Ha
I can't even get a price. Been waiting a week.0 -
Tony
Already got my pricing,,just awaiting delivery.
Gonna try 1 in my own house and 2 others already sold.
Dave0 -
Still wating
tick tock..........
To Learn More About This Professional, Click Here to Visit Their Ad in "Find A Professional"0 -
what is the bottom end input?
I'd love to see a 10-15k low end input, how low does it go.0 -
scott markle
I already put this on awhile back, but here it is again.
Wayne-My supplier says Mon or Tues,,, we`ll see!
Dave0 -
Knight
Doesn't the Lochinvar Knight have a wall hung that turns down to 9,000 btu's?0 -
Actually,
I think it`s 10,000, the Night is a great boiler too, but my preference is the TT.
Dave0 -
but it doesn't come with enough water content to prevent any kind of cycling issues, and it doesn't ignore flow issues, requiring P/S piping in most systems.
nice boiler, but a low modulation solo would be/is the bee's knees IMHO.0 -
Hey Dave
Have you bought the "service kit" yet ?
I opened mine today (still in the shipping box) and thought I was in Heaven. All the necessary parts in a handsome, rugged case.0 -
Finally
got my first 3 60s this morning, at first glance, very little diff from the 110 except no circ, and now a Taco auto-vent. Also new packaging makes for less fumbling to remove from the box.
Tony- Yes I have the service kit, although I haven`t used anything from it yet!
Wayne-How are you making-out?
Dave0 -
I will agree Rob that the water content is not sufficient to prevent cycling but the Knight does have a feature that is unique to prevent cycling.
It has an option to create delays in 10% increments between low and high fire. Giving the boiler a low fire hold for 10-20 minutes, we have found, has limited cycling drastically in our installations.
Given the contrast between say an extra gallon or so of water content and a low fire hold option? I take the LFH.0 -
that's cool, but i would prefer passive measures to active measures given a choice. Water content can't malfunction, and it buys about 1.5 minutes of firing time with NO flow at all.
but if that were the only issue I wouldn't find it compelling either.
Pushing an entire system with ONE UP15-58, now that I love0 -
short cycling
What do you guys think. A small buffer for the low load zones, and a slightly larger indirect to make up for the lower recovery rate??
EMB0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 86.2K THE MAIN WALL
- 3.1K A-C, Heat Pumps & Refrigeration
- 52 Biomass
- 422 Carbon Monoxide Awareness
- 90 Chimneys & Flues
- 2K Domestic Hot Water
- 5.4K Gas Heating
- 99 Geothermal
- 156 Indoor-Air Quality
- 3.4K Oil Heating
- 63 Pipe Deterioration
- 913 Plumbing
- 6K Radiant Heating
- 381 Solar
- 14.8K Strictly Steam
- 3.3K Thermostats and Controls
- 53 Water Quality
- 41 Industry Classes
- 47 Job Opportunities
- 17 Recall Announcements