Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.
Need to contact us? Visit https://heatinghelp.com/contact-us/.
Click here to Find a Contractor in your area.

TT Solo 60

Ross_7
Ross_7 Member Posts: 577
, why the Solo 60's are taking so long to get to distributors? Also, is their website down?
Ross

Comments



  • Anybody get a Solo 60 yet?,,, I`m still waiting on 3.

    Dave
  • Tony_23
    Tony_23 Member Posts: 1,033
    Ha

    I can't even get a price. Been waiting a week.
  • Tony

    Already got my pricing,,just awaiting delivery.
    Gonna try 1 in my own house and 2 others already sold.

    Dave
  • what is the bottom end input?

    I'd love to see a 10-15k low end input, how low does it go.
  • scott markle

    I already put this on awhile back, but here it is again.

    Wayne-My supplier says Mon or Tues,,, we`ll see!

    Dave
  • Mike Dunn
    Mike Dunn Member Posts: 189
    Knight

    Doesn't the Lochinvar Knight have a wall hung that turns down to 9,000 btu's?
  • Actually,

    I think it`s 10,000, the Night is a great boiler too, but my preference is the TT.

    Dave


  • but it doesn't come with enough water content to prevent any kind of cycling issues, and it doesn't ignore flow issues, requiring P/S piping in most systems.

    nice boiler, but a low modulation solo would be/is the bee's knees IMHO.
  • Tony_23
    Tony_23 Member Posts: 1,033
    Hey Dave

    Have you bought the "service kit" yet ?

    I opened mine today (still in the shipping box) and thought I was in Heaven. All the necessary parts in a handsome, rugged case.
  • Finally

    got my first 3 60s this morning, at first glance, very little diff from the 110 except no circ, and now a Taco auto-vent. Also new packaging makes for less fumbling to remove from the box.

    Tony- Yes I have the service kit, although I haven`t used anything from it yet!

    Wayne-How are you making-out?

    Dave
  • Josh M.
    Josh M. Member Posts: 359


    I will agree Rob that the water content is not sufficient to prevent cycling but the Knight does have a feature that is unique to prevent cycling.

    It has an option to create delays in 10% increments between low and high fire. Giving the boiler a low fire hold for 10-20 minutes, we have found, has limited cycling drastically in our installations.

    Given the contrast between say an extra gallon or so of water content and a low fire hold option? I take the LFH.


  • that's cool, but i would prefer passive measures to active measures given a choice. Water content can't malfunction, and it buys about 1.5 minutes of firing time with NO flow at all.

    but if that were the only issue I wouldn't find it compelling either.

    Pushing an entire system with ONE UP15-58, now that I love ;)
  • EMB
    EMB Member Posts: 37
    short cycling

    What do you guys think. A small buffer for the low load zones, and a slightly larger indirect to make up for the lower recovery rate??
    EMB
This discussion has been closed.