Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.
Need to contact us? Visit https://heatinghelp.com/contact-us/.
Click here to Find a Contractor in your area.
Sidewalk snowmelt
Paul Rohrs_4
Member Posts: 466
I am putting together a proposal for a class II residential snowmelt system and they are inquiring about also melting their sidewalks which are next to the street. I don't have any questions about design and layout, but should I?
I can make the drive and courtyard a separate zone with no problem, but should I offer the sidewalk as a separate zone? My concern is that running remote manifolds two different directions will make my system a "Moving Target" for future jobs (think imminent domain) like the city coming in and trenching for this or that. Maybe a sprinkler company or cable company needs to dig up something.
I am not aware of any restrictions or covenants on this, but this is ultimately a public sidewalk that the HO is thinking he might not want to scoop and as long as he has a snowmelt system, why not do the sidewalk.
Any other thoughts or considerations?
Paul
I can make the drive and courtyard a separate zone with no problem, but should I offer the sidewalk as a separate zone? My concern is that running remote manifolds two different directions will make my system a "Moving Target" for future jobs (think imminent domain) like the city coming in and trenching for this or that. Maybe a sprinkler company or cable company needs to dig up something.
I am not aware of any restrictions or covenants on this, but this is ultimately a public sidewalk that the HO is thinking he might not want to scoop and as long as he has a snowmelt system, why not do the sidewalk.
Any other thoughts or considerations?
Paul
0
Comments
-
Municipal R.O.W.
Paul, we had a similar situation. The only way the city would sign off on it was if the HO would sign a liabilty release for putting their equipment (snowmelt tubes) into the cities right of way. They also had a caveat that if the snowmelt system generated any kind of ice dam (which it could) the city had the right to charge the HO for removal of said dam/hump.
We never connected the system to a heat source, but I'm thinking that if we had, where the melted surfaces met the unmelted surfaces, there could have been an issue.
ME0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 86.2K THE MAIN WALL
- 3.1K A-C, Heat Pumps & Refrigeration
- 52 Biomass
- 422 Carbon Monoxide Awareness
- 90 Chimneys & Flues
- 2K Domestic Hot Water
- 5.4K Gas Heating
- 99 Geothermal
- 156 Indoor-Air Quality
- 3.4K Oil Heating
- 63 Pipe Deterioration
- 915 Plumbing
- 6K Radiant Heating
- 381 Solar
- 14.8K Strictly Steam
- 3.3K Thermostats and Controls
- 53 Water Quality
- 41 Industry Classes
- 47 Job Opportunities
- 17 Recall Announcements