Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.
Need to contact us? Visit https://heatinghelp.com/contact-us/.
Click here to Find a Contractor in your area.
Wetback -vs- Dryback
Brad White
Member Posts: 2,399
Hi guys- Busy patch at work and at home... Tim White of Timco notified me about this thread..
UniR has it.
A wetback or wet-base boiler has water on all sides of the combustion chamber. The wetback boiler specifically has water on the side opposite the flame gun or "target brick" in the old-style boilers. In a wetback style this is iron usually. A dry-back example might be an old porkchop style boiler where a refractory chamber and target brick wall is built up the back side.
The advantage of a wetback boiler is greater wetted surface area compared to combustion area so more heat from the flue gasses can be absorbed. Another advantage is, depending on internal boiler circulation, a natural convection is allowed all around the boiler which reduces thermal stresses.
There is no "advantage" I can think of to a dry-back or dry-base boiler. They are inherently less efficient but I presume that they exist as a limitation of their design. Except for the large "pork chop" boilers and the sizes they allow in cast iron boilers, I cannot see a reason to use them with what we have available today.
If I understand the question correctly, that is my take on it.
No, such boilers are not made south of Texas, so let's not go there :)
UniR has it.
A wetback or wet-base boiler has water on all sides of the combustion chamber. The wetback boiler specifically has water on the side opposite the flame gun or "target brick" in the old-style boilers. In a wetback style this is iron usually. A dry-back example might be an old porkchop style boiler where a refractory chamber and target brick wall is built up the back side.
The advantage of a wetback boiler is greater wetted surface area compared to combustion area so more heat from the flue gasses can be absorbed. Another advantage is, depending on internal boiler circulation, a natural convection is allowed all around the boiler which reduces thermal stresses.
There is no "advantage" I can think of to a dry-back or dry-base boiler. They are inherently less efficient but I presume that they exist as a limitation of their design. Except for the large "pork chop" boilers and the sizes they allow in cast iron boilers, I cannot see a reason to use them with what we have available today.
If I understand the question correctly, that is my take on it.
No, such boilers are not made south of Texas, so let's not go there :)
"If you do not know the answer, say, "I do not know the answer", and you will be correct!"
-Ernie White, my Dad
-Ernie White, my Dad
0
Comments
-
Wetback -vs- Dryback
What are the pros and cons of wetback versus dryback boilers?
Thank You,
Bernie0 -
insert joke here:0 -
I can't
Maybe Brad ???
Scott
To Learn More About This Professional, Click Here to Visit Their Ad in "Find A Professional"0 -
Yes, Brad.
Although, is it true that he has left for the Denver Wetstock by stagecoach? He hasn't been heard from in a while.
:-)
Jack0 -
Back = Base
You might want to do a Google search on ["Wet Base" "Dry Base" Boiler Advantages]. Basically, a wet base boiler will be a 2 or 3 pass boiler where the combustion area is surrounded by water passages which can mean more efficient heat transfer.0 -
I know
Brad would be all over it. That wasn't just a open door, it was an open garage door!0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 86.2K THE MAIN WALL
- 3.1K A-C, Heat Pumps & Refrigeration
- 52 Biomass
- 422 Carbon Monoxide Awareness
- 90 Chimneys & Flues
- 2K Domestic Hot Water
- 5.4K Gas Heating
- 99 Geothermal
- 156 Indoor-Air Quality
- 3.4K Oil Heating
- 63 Pipe Deterioration
- 915 Plumbing
- 6K Radiant Heating
- 381 Solar
- 14.8K Strictly Steam
- 3.3K Thermostats and Controls
- 53 Water Quality
- 41 Industry Classes
- 47 Job Opportunities
- 17 Recall Announcements