Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.
Need to contact us? Visit https://heatinghelp.com/contact-us/.
Click here to Find a Contractor in your area.

Wetback -vs- Dryback

Brad White
Brad White Member Posts: 2,399
Hi guys- Busy patch at work and at home... Tim White of Timco notified me about this thread..

UniR has it.

A wetback or wet-base boiler has water on all sides of the combustion chamber. The wetback boiler specifically has water on the side opposite the flame gun or "target brick" in the old-style boilers. In a wetback style this is iron usually. A dry-back example might be an old porkchop style boiler where a refractory chamber and target brick wall is built up the back side.

The advantage of a wetback boiler is greater wetted surface area compared to combustion area so more heat from the flue gasses can be absorbed. Another advantage is, depending on internal boiler circulation, a natural convection is allowed all around the boiler which reduces thermal stresses.

There is no "advantage" I can think of to a dry-back or dry-base boiler. They are inherently less efficient but I presume that they exist as a limitation of their design. Except for the large "pork chop" boilers and the sizes they allow in cast iron boilers, I cannot see a reason to use them with what we have available today.

If I understand the question correctly, that is my take on it.

No, such boilers are not made south of Texas, so let's not go there :)
"If you do not know the answer, say, "I do not know the answer", and you will be correct!"



-Ernie White, my Dad

Comments

This discussion has been closed.