Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.
Need to contact us? Visit https://heatinghelp.com/contact-us/.
Click here to Find a Contractor in your area.

Theory: Delta T and Flow

As long as no other variables change.

Comments

  • Mark_46
    Mark_46 Member Posts: 312
    Fuzzy Math

    Can somebody confirm my assumptions?...

    When GPM flow increases, Delta T decreases.
    When GPM flow decreases, Delta T increases
  • Brad White
    Brad White Member Posts: 2,399
    Warm and Fuzzy Math

    Yes.
    "If you do not know the answer, say, "I do not know the answer", and you will be correct!"



    -Ernie White, my Dad
  • Empire_2
    Empire_2 Member Posts: 2,340
    That's a Good Bingo.

    Check out the B&G Web site. They have an awesome System syzer that will give you ALL the answers. If you have a local B&G Dist. in town, they should be able to give to the slide SS calculator....

    Hey Brad:? I have to tell you that THAT is the Shortest ANSWER i HAVE EVER SEEN YOU GIVE...:-)

    Mike T.
  • Mark_46
    Mark_46 Member Posts: 312
    Thanks gents

  • Brad White
    Brad White Member Posts: 2,399
    Then you never saw me answer

    no.

    :)
    "If you do not know the answer, say, "I do not know the answer", and you will be correct!"



    -Ernie White, my Dad
  • Weezbo
    Weezbo Member Posts: 6,231
    *~/:)

    100%
  • Glenn Sossin_2
    Glenn Sossin_2 Member Posts: 592
    but they do change

    thats why they call them variables
  • Correct

    That's why the answer to this post should be no. It can but not always.
  • scott markle_2
    scott markle_2 Member Posts: 611
    delta and transfer

    For me the interesting and somwhat confusing thing about this relationship is the effect on transfer.

    Delta is indicative of transfer yet a low delta high flow can transfer more energy because the average surface temp of the emmitters are higher

    Seems to me that conventional wisdom was to overpump and maintain low deltas. thus avioding derating calculations for long loops or boiler condensation issues.

    A more progressive aproach is to embrace high delta, as we can move energy with less pump power, Although there are design chalenges that come with this

  • You're not confued

    That's the way things work in the real world.
  • Mark Eatherton
    Mark Eatherton Member Posts: 5,864
    Which would move more energy...

    1 GPM at a 100 degree delta T, OR 100 GPM at a 1 degree delta T...

    I agree with Scott. The correct answer is, it depends.

    If you are talking a single fluid stream then yes, your assumptions are fairly safe. If you are talking two fluid streams, then probably not.

    It just depends....

    ME

    There was an error rendering this rich post.

  • bob_46
    bob_46 Member Posts: 813
    BTU

    Q=W*C*T1-T2 the temperature doesn't seem to have anything to do with it.

    There was an error rendering this rich post.

  • Dave_12
    Dave_12 Member Posts: 77
    Flow vs Delta T

    Mark:

    Yes, flow is directly related to delta T. Firing rate, flow, and delta T are related as follows:

    BTU/HR = GPM x 500 (constant) x Delta T

    (The 500 constant is from 60 sec/min x 8.33 lb/gal)

    If you know any two, you can compute the third. If firing rate is the same, then you can see that if GPM goes down, then delta T goes up in proportion.

    This is a fundamental formula that anyone designing hydronic systems should commit to memory. It is extremely useful.

    Hope this helps.

  • Rocky_3
    Rocky_3 Member Posts: 236
    Using formula for BTU/Hr

    If the constant of 500 is derived from the density of water at, what, 60 degree, 65 degrees? Then if you change the density of the fluid, ie add glycol or change the temperature from 60-65, then the constant also changes, yes? So if I'm on a job, and have a handy reference chart of densities of various glycol solutions at different temperatures, then I should be able to calculate the exact heat transfer rated for any fluid I am trying to pump. Or, is there so little difference that I'm better off just sticking to the rule of thumb?

    thanks,
    Rocky
  • bob_46
    bob_46 Member Posts: 813
    Rocky

    Go to B&G's site and click on Syzer. You can plug in all kinds of variables and play "what if".

    There was an error rendering this rich post.

  • Mark_46
    Mark_46 Member Posts: 312
    Thanks!

    Dave,

    Yes that formula helps in more ways than one. Thanks.

    Separate from why I started this thread, I have been curious to find GPM for both my zones at a given pump speed. That formula seems to do that if you know 2 of three variables, as you said, rather than calculating head feet by pipe length and components? Whats confusing to me is when finding head feet a GPM must be assumed. Im trying to FIND GPM!
    larrytalley
  • jp_2
    jp_2 Member Posts: 1,935
    pump curve

    if you know the head in feet use the graph of the pumps head vs GPM curve
  • ALH_4
    ALH_4 Member Posts: 1,790
    System curve and pump curve

    You have to plot your system curve on the pump curve to find the operating point. To do that, assume several gpm numbers and calculate the head loss and plot those points on the curve for your pump. Draw the curve through those points and read the head a gpm from the intersection.
  • scott markle_2
    scott markle_2 Member Posts: 611
    head

    Mark, I think your misunderstanding something, as far as I know there is no way to calculate gpm without an assessment of the pipe work, if knowing this to a high degree of accuracy is important a flow meter may be easer than adding up all the fittings and footage's. The pump and the pipes determine the flow. Btu's have no effect on flow. What the equation Gpm= btu/500xdelta tells you is the gpm required to move a given btu at a given delta. 20 is a convenient delt to work with because the math is easy 15000 btu = 1.5 gpm etc.
  • Mark_46
    Mark_46 Member Posts: 312
    One more

    One more question.

    When a component is specified at, eg, 6 head feet that means 6 head feet not 6 feet of equivalant pipe length, correct?
  • Korrect...

    feet of head is a pressure term. It, one foot of head, is equal to .433 PSI. So in your case, 6 feet of head equals 2.6 PSI differential pressure, or pressure drop.

    ME
This discussion has been closed.