Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.

# replacement boiler size?

Options
Member Posts: 6,928
Somethings sounds amis. I'd double-check everything.

That's 45 btu/sq.ft. heat loss. Very high unless the climate is extremely cold and/or the shell is in awful shape--leaky with essentially no insulation.

Amount of radiation (214 sq.ft. EDR) sounds low for an old hot water system. Are you positive you're using the correct table for the rads in question? Using a tube-type table for column rads would result in far less EDR than is actually there. Can you post a photo of a rad?

At 170F average water temp the resulting 20 btu/hr per square foot of floor area sounds very low for an old system. Have radiators been removed?

Perhaps the rads were sized for significantly hotter temps than 170 average. Is this a steam system converted to hot water? Perhaps an old gravity system with something like a Honeywell "heat generator" that allowed significantly hotter water temps and higher pressure? Is there something that looks rather like a butter churn on the floor next to the boiler?

• Member Posts: 4
Options
replacement boiler size?

I did a heat loss calculation for a 1600 sqft home and came up with a total btuhr need of 72000. So at 83% eff. I need a 90,000btu boiler. I measured the radiators and converted them to sqft edr. 1sqft edr = 150btuhr with an average water temp of 170. I have 214sqft edr x 150= 32,100btuhr. My question is Why put a boiler in that more than doubles what the connected radiation can give off? What am I missing?
• Member Posts: 53
Options
Paul

Where is the house and do you have windows and doors?

A 1,600 SF house with insulated 2x4 walls, average areas of single pane windows and storm windows should have a heat loss (assuming a 0 degree outside design temperature and 68F indoors) in my experience would fall between 25 and 36 BTUH per SF depending on how "tight" the house is to infiltration.

That would put you at about 40,000 to 56,000 BTUH. You would be in the range of about 45 BTUH per SF not bad but room for improvement. Let's stipulate that it is "in range"- it seems more so than the radiation part.

The median level of 48 BTUH PSF if taken at zero outside- to get to your target heat loss of 72,000 your house would have to be in a -34F design area. Is that about (or "aboot") correct?

If there is room to spend money on improving your envelope, that is to me the best investment.

But do check your radiation take-offs; those numbers are more out of whack than your heat loss could be.
• Member Posts: 592
Options