Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.
Need to contact us? Visit https://heatinghelp.com/contact-us/.
Click here to Find a Contractor in your area.

Contract Re-negotiations

Options
Robert O'Brien
Robert O'Brien Member Posts: 3,541
would it be Illegal for someone to want to renegotiate? Why would someone want to do business with a mega-builder in the first place? Did they think they would actually be allowed to make a profit? Did they actually think they would be paid? And on time? If so,I assume they know better now.

<A HREF="http://www.heatinghelp.com/getListed.cfm?id=313&Step=30">To Learn More About This Professional, Click Here to Visit Their Ad in "Find A Professional"</A>
To learn more about this professional, click here to visit their ad in Find A Contractor.

Comments

  • Keith_8
    Keith_8 Member Posts: 399
    Options
    Contract Re-negotiations

    I just read the article about the home builder Lennar. They issued letters to all of their subs requesting that they cut their pricing and invoices by as much as 20%. This is on work already under contract and in some cases already completed.

    How is this legal?

    Keith
  • The Wire Nut
    The Wire Nut Member Posts: 420
    Options
    They can ask, demand, whatever...

    ... but it doesn't mean that the sub is obligated to cut their contract pricing. The automotive industry in the US practiced this for years, until they had run so many suppliers out of business and/or into consolidation with others, that the suppliers are now bigger than the car companies. Now it's payback time.

    I read recently that Ford had their diesel engines yanked when they tried to play hardball with their supplier. Stopped the assembly line... must have gotten management attention, pronto!

    If I were a sub to Lennar, I'd weigh the costs and benefits of cutting the invoice by 20%. For example, if I had the option to walk away with 80% of what is owed that day in cash, I might take that offer. Other creditors might not end up walking away with that much...

    If, on the other hand, you believe that Lennar is going to be around for a while, you don't need them to keep the company afloat, and you're OK with some additional working capital, a lawsuit, etc. then your best alternative to a negotiated agreement might be to take them to court if they don't pay in full.

    To me, this situation is yet another reminder why working as a small fish to a much bigger company can be so problematic.
    "Let me control you"

    Lost in SOHO NYC and Balmy Whites Valley PA
  • Brad White_9
    Brad White_9 Member Posts: 2,440
    Options
    Financial Circumstances

    As Robert said, well, they can ask...

    My biggest concern is what Constantin said about small players in the big sandbox, how a mega-concern can steamroll the little guy knowing that, contract or not, enforcing the contract can cost much more than the 20% delta.

    But that 20% delta represents not just OH&P but sometimes the difference between breaking even and owing for materials.

    The contract holder can always say "no". The risk is in losing future work which at the rate of 80% of likly cost, is doing you a favor. The notion of doing this after the fact though, after job completion, sounds like the GC using the subs as a financial backer. If the subs agree that is an instant 20% ROI.

    Mechanic's Liens have a certain appeal sometimes. Banks hate them :)
  • mtfallsmikey
    mtfallsmikey Member Posts: 765
    Options
    Lots of subs have been clobbered already

    In my area by this practice,won't mention any names, but, as I've seen the same cycle several times in my life, many go into business in the boom times, hoping to score big with a large builder or developer, only to get jammed when the going gets tough. Dad and I gave up all new construction except for one builder back in '82, never looked back. During these same boom times a service contractor can clean up, but when slowdown time comes is suddenly competing with the former builder's subs who lowball every job.
  • Paul Pollets
    Paul Pollets Member Posts: 3,656
    Options
    Below the costs...

    Since most subs in the building trades work with a 5-10% profit margin, or less, that means Lennar is asking the subs to do work without a profit. Or even at a loss.

    Those subs won't be in business for long.....

    To Learn More About This Professional, Click Here to Visit Their Ad in "Find A Professional"
  • The Wire Nut
    The Wire Nut Member Posts: 420
    Options
    Yup...

    It's a re-run of the car biz, with the obvious difference that there are a lot more little contractors to destroy than car part suppliers. A sucker is born every minute, or somethng like that.

    Yesterday's WSJ mentioned that Lennar posted a 73% drop in net (on the front page). The Lennar CEO may see this as a great opportunity to try and pull a fast one on the subs... see who blinks first.

    I'd take it as a lesson not to do business with Lennar, I guess.
    "Let me control you"

    Lost in SOHO NYC and Balmy Whites Valley PA
  • Robert O'Brien
    Robert O'Brien Member Posts: 3,541
    Options
    Since

    the CEO presided over a disastrous qtr.Is he planning a 20% cut of his $5.71 million annual salary?

    To Learn More About This Professional, Click Here to Visit Their Ad in "Find A Professional"
    To learn more about this professional, click here to visit their ad in Find A Contractor.
  • The Wire Nut
    The Wire Nut Member Posts: 420
    Options
    Hee hee...

    I think I personally experienced a CEO that took much greater care in negotiating his pay package and golden parachute than running the business. Less than two years after taking over the business, the company was bankrupt.

    Also consider that most CEO's don't take pay cuts. Those that do, frequently load up with stock options instead. (See Steve Jobs as a famous example)

    If the business does better in the future, they get a huge windfall, but at least they share some of the business risk... However, in some cases even the stock option grants seem vastly out of proportion with the benefits to shareholders of a revived company.
    "Let me control you"

    Lost in SOHO NYC and Balmy Whites Valley PA
  • Steve_35
    Steve_35 Member Posts: 546
    Options
    This is one of the reasons

    I shifted the focus of my company. In 2002 71% of our gross sales was with primarily one GC. In 2006 we did NO work for that GC and only 12% of gross sales with 3 GCs.

    Granted our gross sales only rose about 10% in that period, but we replaced a huge portion of our business with more profitable, easier to work with clients. And we're learning what a net profit is. :)
  • Bernie Riddle_2
    Bernie Riddle_2 Member Posts: 178
    Options
    Prepare Your Exit

    Do not make a dramatic stand on the 20% if they owe you 90 days of invoicing. Be smart & plan your action on this decision, regardless of which way you go. For example if you decide to bail out, be very visible at the site &/or project meetings while at the same time you pull your key (most expensive) workers off the site & limit material purchases for this job. Be prepared to eat a month or so of invoicing. Immediately start to limit your exposure. Listen to others comments but keep you actions to yourself. It sounds like self preservation time to me. .... Bromley
  • Steamhead (in transit)
    Steamhead (in transit) Member Posts: 6,688
    Options
    If the contracts had already been signed

    stating what the payments would be, and Lennar is expecting not to pay what was agreed to........ sounds like a class-action lawsuit to me.

    To Learn More About This Professional, Click Here to Visit Their Ad in "Find A Professional"
This discussion has been closed.