Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.
Need to contact us? Visit https://heatinghelp.com/contact-us/.
Click here to Find a Contractor in your area.

New life for the old Mueller

Timco
Timco Member Posts: 3,040
This poor old beast had two DHW exp tanks turned upside down for expansion. The press flew from 5-25# when she fired up. It was straight gravity.(great excuse to buy my first 36" Rigid wrench! She's a beauty!!) I forced the water with the circ shown and re-piped a proper exp tank. This one was oversized, as the correct one was a week out. Piped the water/exp tank on the return manifold, across the boiler from the circ, still pumping away. Cust would not consider a new boiler....old 4-plex. Cries broke. The press now goes from 15-19#, and the water is set back to 160* from 180. It heats up totally evenly now (before it was 2 hours before the farthest unit got heat) and twice as fast. Happy customer. Stack temp is only 210*, and lots of draft.(-.05 WC) Tall stack.

Tim
Just a guy running some pipes.

Comments

  • kevin coppinger_4
    kevin coppinger_4 Member Posts: 2,124
    you are not....

    leaving it w/ the stack at 210*F are you? Does it have a new liner?....kpc

    To Learn More About This Professional, Click Here to Visit Their Ad in "Find A Professional"
  • Timco
    Timco Member Posts: 3,040


    Original 45' stack, single wall liner. Was looking for suggestions on how to damper the draft to get a better stack temp. Boiler is 1942.

    Tim
    Just a guy running some pipes.
  • Steamhead (in transit)
    Steamhead (in transit) Member Posts: 6,688
    Try a \"neutral pressure point\"

    this is covered in Tim McElwain's manuals.

    To Learn More About This Professional, Click Here to Visit Their Ad in "Find A Professional"
  • Maine Ken
    Maine Ken Member Posts: 531


    At 210* with a -.05 draft you are not going to get the stack temp up to a safe point by lowering the draft. That puppy is short for this world!!!!

    To Learn More About This Professional, Click Here to Visit Their Ad in "Find A Professional"
  • Timco
    Timco Member Posts: 3,040


    Could you elaborate? I am west...Tim is east..and they did not cover a neural press point in my classes.

    Tim
    Just a guy running some pipes.
  • Timco
    Timco Member Posts: 3,040


    Short? -.05 was greatest reading. -.03 was lowest. Windy day.

    Tim
    Just a guy running some pipes.
  • Scott04
    Scott04 Member Posts: 69


    Tim,

    Have you checked your thermometer lately? With one of those old beasts, I would be very suprised to see a stack temp that low. At that temp, it is a constant rainstorm in the chimney and the boiler. That is what Ken meant by "short for this world".
    Also, unless I'm missing something, lowering the draft would decrease the stack temp. With a .05 draft, I just don't see a temp of 210* as being possible.

    Again, test your instruments! Using testers only help if they are accurate.

    Scott
  • Timco
    Timco Member Posts: 3,040


    I'll recheck it against my fluke with a probe. Test was done with my fyrite pro 125...just a year old. Wouldn't less draft increase the temp? LARGE ventacross the back, and gaps all along the floor. There is alot of rust flake in the bottom (on the floor) inside this beast. Blew it all out prior to firing. COAF was 42ppm, excess air was over 350%. I have the printout in the truck.

    Thanks,

    Tim
    Just a guy running some pipes.
  • Scott04
    Scott04 Member Posts: 69


    Tim,

    If that unit is leaking that much air into the combustion area, it needs to be tagged unsafe, and made inoperable. In this case it really doesn't matter if a new boiler is "out of the question". The unit is unsafe PERIOD! The HO has NO say in the matter. You worked on it, now YOU own it. If anything happens with that unit, YOU will be held accountable.

    With that much air leaking in, that explains the low stack temp. In this case less draft would be better. Normally, less draft lowers stack temp because it pulls the gasses out slower so they are in contact with the heat exchanger longer and transfer more heat into the water. In your case, the high draft is pulling more cold air from the room, thereby reducing stack temp.

    Scott
  • Timco
    Timco Member Posts: 3,040


    8" vent..45', 8"connector...3'. 215,000BTU. First readings : 343.6%Ex Air, 210* stack temp, 16.6%O2, 2.4%CO2, 8ppmCO, 39ppmCOAF. New readings : 122.4 Ex Air, 342* Stack temp, 12.1% O2, 5.0% CO2, 9ppm CO, 21ppm COAF.

    LESS DRAFT. Was -.06 WC, now -.02 WC....thanks for the advise!

    Tim
    Just a guy running some pipes.
  • Dale
    Dale Member Posts: 1,317
    stack temp

    I may have missed the fuel type, looks like nat gas, or maybe propane. As the other posts suggested the stack temp is way too low, since the flue pipe design seems to be original and this looks like an atmospheric burner you need to raise the vent temp by checking input and since you have probably already done that, checking outlet water temp. I think you will need a bypass line to hold the outlet temp above 140 degrees. This may also be a job where you need to convert to a barometric damper.
  • Scott04
    Scott04 Member Posts: 69


    Tim,

    I never gave it a thought that this unit could be atmospheric gas. I do mainly oil, and have seen units very similar to this one. The information I gave is for an oil fired unit! (I assume it also holds true for a power gas unit as well) The reasoning for the draft/flue temp is the same, but, of course, the whole unsafe issue would only apply to the oil or power gas.

    Scott
This discussion has been closed.