Welcome! Here are the website rules, as well as some tips for using this forum.
Need to contact us? Visit https://heatinghelp.com/contact-us/.
Click here to Find a Contractor in your area.
most economical scenario
Options
Live/Learn
Member Posts: 97
Hi Wallies, Question! which is more economical a small fire (low firing rate .75 nozzel) running longer to come up to temp. or a larger fire (1.05 nozzel that reaches high point faster? Both firing rates heat my home adequately. I seemed to have burnt about the same amount of fuel this year(using .75) as I did last year (1.05) which was a colder Winter I think. Which is better for the boiler? I would think longer run times. Thanks Live/Learn
0
Comments
-
I would think the lowest firing rate
consistent with heating the house in a reasonable amount of time and keeping the stack warm enough.
Take the scenario to an extreme in both directions:
Say you put in a 2.0+ GPH nozzle. You would over-fire and waste a tremendous amount of fuel, have high stack temperatures and probably incomplete combustion.
If you put in a 0.50 or less nozzle you run the risk of condensation, low passage and flue temperatures and long firing times to get to temperature.
Same philosophy re: modulating gas- lower fire is more efficient due to higher surface area to combustion gas volume ratios. But the boilers are built to take it.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 85.2K THE MAIN WALL
- 3.1K A-C, Heat Pumps & Refrigeration
- 55 Biomass
- 424 Carbon Monoxide Awareness
- 73 Chimneys & Flues
- 1.9K Domestic Hot Water
- 5.2K Gas Heating
- 129 Geothermal
- 160 Indoor-Air Quality
- 3.3K Oil Heating
- 61 Pipe Deterioration
- 884 Plumbing
- 5.9K Radiant Heating
- 376 Solar
- 14.7K Strictly Steam
- 3.2K Thermostats and Controls
- 59 Water Quality
- 49 Industry Classes
- 89 Job Opportunities
- 28 Recall Announcements