To get email notification when someone adds to a thread you're following, click on the star in the thread's header and it will turn yellow; click again to turn it off. To edit your profile, click on the gear.
The Wall has a powerful search engine that will go all the way back to 2002. Use "quotation marks" around multiple-word searches. RIGHT-CLICK on the results and choose Open Link In New Window so you'll be able to get back to your results. Happy searching!
In fairness to all, we don't discuss pricing on the Wall. Thanks for your cooperation.
Need to contact us? Visit https://heatinghelp.com/contact-us/.

Help designing constant circulation with CI radiatiors and low mass boiler

BBrosBBros Member Posts: 4
Hello,



I'm in the trades and have a "reasonable" knowledge of heating systems, but need some help with specifics for a house I'm remodeling. The local heating contractors do not have much experience with the type of system I'm interested in, such as has been discussed on this site.



Home is 1920's two-story in Central Maine. Total heat-loss is around 62k btu, the largest space being kitchen/family room at 16.6k loss. Emitters are all original CI radiators, mostly 2x over-sized (i.e. bedrooms have 4.5k btu loss with over 8k in emitter capability).



I'm planning to home-run with 1/2 pex to a radiant style manifold. Boiler is Purepro Trio low-mass oil fired at 79k net IBR (smallest model). I have a hydrostat with outdoor reset capability. My intent is to have a single variable speed circulator and TRVs.



So... which circulator, which TRVs, and what else is necessary? My calculations say 145F water and perhaps only 1gpm, which seems really low. Do I need to worry about protecting the boiler from condensing, and if so, through what method.



DHW is planned to be on a separate system, but if it would be better to do a indirect to keep the mass up, I'll consider it. Do I need a pressure bypass in the system? Should it be primary-secondary? Hydronic separator?



I've read so many threads on here about various systems, and I understand most of it, but some specific layout/equipment info is still needed. My heating contractor is comfortable building whatever I want, but as noted, doesn't have familiarity with this type of system (constant circ, TRVs).



Thanks for any guidance.
·

Comments

  • GordyGordy Member Posts: 5,677
    I See

    A Taco I Valve with outdoor reset, and boiler protection. Yes you have to keep return temps to boiler above 130.

    You say you have reset capability on the boiler , but not whether you have the components for ODR. Primary secondary Piping, or Hydraulic seperator. Delta P circulator on radiation side of an eco vario circ, or bumble Bee variety for the TRV's after seeing what system head is if those circs will work. They should.



    If you are over radiated thats great for modulating water temps. To bad its not a Modulating boiler, but I take it oil is only available fuel source.
    ·
  • BBrosBBros Member Posts: 4
    Primary Secondary

    Thanks.



    I have the Aquastat 3250 w/the ODR kit. How does the Taco I Valve fit into the equation? As a replacement? Does it work in conjunction?



    If using primary/secondary there will be just a standard fair circulator on the prime loop, and the variable on the secondary (sized for the head of the system). That would mean no pressure relief is necessary, correct? Or should one be on the end of the manifold so that in the event all the TRVs are closed, that it has room to flow as the pump slows down. I don't know why I envisioned a single circulator system. Not really possible.



    Anyone have TRV recommendations? There seem to be quite a number of options, and variances in cost.



    Indeed, oil is the only option. NG is years away and is increasing in price dramatically where available. LP is an option, but the efficiency of the mod-con wouldn't over come the added expense of fuel. Coal and wood options are not appropriate for this application.
    ·
  • GordyGordy Member Posts: 5,677
    edited August 2014
    ODR

    The I valve R has reset capability you have that. The S series has setpoint capability. So S Series for boiler protection it has a boiler return sensor, and supply sensor.



    Delta T circ would do the job on the emitter side also probably better even than delta P. Set the delta for 20* and the circ will change speed to maintain set delta as trvs close, and higher flow rates start to happen. The Bumble bees curve may not meet the system flow rates, and head though.



    TRVs Danfoss, Caleffi make nice ones.



    Think about boiler cycling, and buffer tank.
    ·
  • BBrosBBros Member Posts: 4
    Bumping this old thread up, because the new heat system side of the project got backlogged significantly... but I'm back at it now. I have better understanding of this stuff, but still very much amateur.

    I've modified this sketch, borrowed from elsewhere, to what I'm planning on doing (deleted DHW):



    Taco i-series 4-way w/ODR, and a BB or Alpha circulator. Also have some form of dirt separation, probably combo unit with air.

    Hoping not to need P/S with an additional pump, but I've got to do some more calculation on the flow and head. I've also go to figure out what size 4-way, as I've read that I want to use smallest that will work, regardless of header size.

    The one puzzler I have is: what happens on week+ long vacation?

    With potentially 8 separate TRVs throughout the house, I'd rather not have to go into each one and turn them down. Is there a good way to add a master thermostat for full system setback? My searching through the forum hasn't produced a good answer.
    ·
  • Solid_Fuel_ManSolid_Fuel_Man Member Posts: 246
    For setback you could use a thermostat to control the system circulator. When the thermostat is calling all the trv's would be wide open though. In normal constant circulation mode the thermostat could be bypassed.

    Or you could make an alternate reset curve and a lower temp to radiators. Effectively rendering the trv's as wide open valves again.

    Depending on the equipment you choose either of those control strategies would work. The latter being the most elegant of course.

    Taylor
    Specialising in boiler and burner controls, multiple fuel systems, radiant system controls, building controls, and master refrigeration tech.
    ·
  • BBrosBBros Member Posts: 4
    Thanks Taylor. There doesn't seem to be a perfect solution, as you said the TRVs will be open and the balance will be off. Shouldn't be too bad, as I plan to balance at the manifold.

    I think for the time being I'll go with a thermostat for ease. In an ideal world, where would this thermostat be located? I'm guessing a "cold" spot in the house?

    If I'm calculating it correctly, I'll have just over 6' of head. I'm having trouble calculating because the piping will be a mix of 1/2" pex, 3/4" cu, and some 3/4 + 1" iron risers. The longest run is roughly 100' round trip with 3/4 cu risers (15' each) and the balance in 1/2" pex. However there is another run that has a significant amount of 3/4 iron, and that may offer more resistance. I haven't even considered the actual restriction of the radiator. Gulp.

    Based on 65k btu, I'm looking at 6.5gpm system flow, or ~.8gpm per loop.

    In another thread there was discussion about the iSeries 3/4" vs 1" in regards to Cv of 7 vs 9.3 and that it should be sized down for best response. Should I be using the 3/4? Since 6.5 is obviously closest to 7, as I understand it that's the choice. But what if I flubbed the heat-loss for the building and it's actually 7.5gpm needed... then the added head from the valve almost doubles! Would want the 1"?? I guess I don't fully understand the relationship between Cv and system flow requirements.

    The boiler has 1-1/2 for supply/return, but I'm planning on bushing down immediately and piping 1-1/4" to the air scoop, then dropping to 1" to the valve (potentially down to 3/4 at the valve). On the return going from 1" back to to 1 1/4" after dirt separator. The pump and manifold piping will be 1"

    Gordy mentioned the potential need for a buffer tank... I'm hoping to avoid it, but how do you determine the need?

    Please point out my stupidity if it's showing. My eyes are starting to glaze over after having read so much. The idronics publications are fascinating, but overwhelming at times.
    ·
  • HatterasguyHatterasguy Member Posts: 5,049
    edited September 27
    BBros said:



    If I'm calculating it correctly, I'll have just over 6' of head.

    In another thread there was discussion about the iSeries 3/4" vs 1" in regards to Cv of 7 vs 9.3 and that it should be sized down for best response. Should I be using the 3/4? Since 6.5 is obviously closest to 7, as I understand it that's the choice. But what if I flubbed the heat-loss for the building and it's actually 7.5gpm needed... then the added head from the valve almost doubles! Would want the 1"?? I guess I don't fully understand the relationship between Cv and system flow requirements.

    If you are flowing 7 gpm through a valve with a Cv of 7, the headloss through the valve is 2.3 feet.

    If you are flowing 7.5 gpm through a valve with a Cv of 7, the headloss through the valve is 2.6 feet.

    One of these values gets added to your original calculation of 6'.

    You would neither want nor need the 1" valve.
    ·
Sign In or Register to comment.

Welcome

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!