To get email notification when someone adds to a thread you're following, click on the star in the thread's header and it will turn yellow; click again to turn it off. To edit your profile, click on the gear.
The Wall has a powerful search engine that will go all the way back to 2002. Use "quotation marks" around multiple-word searches. RIGHT-CLICK on the results and choose Open Link In New Window so you'll be able to get back to your results. Happy searching!
In fairness to all, we don't discuss pricing on the Wall. Thanks for your cooperation.
Need to contact us? Visit

Instantaneous vs Indirect

DobberDobber Member Posts: 91
 I am currently quoting a radiant job that the homeowner wants an instantaneous water heater (Bosch) as opposed to an indirect. He has one now and likes it and believes it will be cheaper to run than an indirect with the boiler.

 I have never been a fan of instantaneous water heaters but I'm not stubborn enough to give a customer want they want as opposed to what they need.

 My question is, is there any operating cost comparison studies out there that I can use to  show  customers?


If you don't have time to do it right, what makes you think you have time to do it over?


  • ChrisChris Member Posts: 3,039
    "The bitter taste of a poor installation remains much longer than the sweet taste of the lowest price."
  • Robert O'BrienRobert O'Brien Member Posts: 2,781
    I too would lean toward indirect

    The local utility offers a rebate on indirects but not tankless? The indirect should last longer,need less maintenance and repair and IMO the operating costs are so close as to be neglible. Since the customer already has one,I'll leave out the quirks of DHW delivery with tankless heaters .
  • R ManninoR Mannino Member Posts: 420

    How about your take on that paper Chris, I have some beer to drink and don't have time! :')
  • ChrisChris Member Posts: 3,039
    In a Nutshell

    Drink to your hearts content! No savings, but ya get 5 cents a can or bottle..
    "The bitter taste of a poor installation remains much longer than the sweet taste of the lowest price."
  • CanuckerCanucker Member Posts: 219

    I skimmed the article but it appears that they compared stand alone natural draft WH to a tankless and found a long payback? That would make an indirect an even better option, unless I missed that part, no?
    You can have it good, fast or cheap. Pick two
  • gennadygennady Member Posts: 662

    Indirect tank allows to size boiler to heating load and decouple DHW load from heating load. And because of that there is no need to oversize boiler. Also, post pumping allows to use heat otherwise be wasted. Also peak of DHW might be a huge btu draw, and gas line has to be sized accordingly. Instantaneous heater representatives try to convince it is not true, but in my opinion it is a big factor.
    Gennady Tsakh

    Absolute Mechanical Co. Inc.
This discussion has been closed.


It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!